User talk:192.109.190.88

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

March 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Alex McLeish, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.  Skysmurf  (Talk) 22:30, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2012[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to BMW Welt. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Biker Biker (talk) 15:40, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, 192.109.190.88. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

  • Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
  • Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
  • Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
  • Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Please be careful editing BMW-related articles Biker Biker (talk) 15:40, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2012[edit]

Hello, I'm Callanecc. I noticed that you made a change to an article, FNSS Defence Systems, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 12:26, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Unified Modeling Language[edit]

Hi, I undid your removal of text in the UML article, and added a fact-tag instead. If you don't agree, please start a discussion on the article's talk-page, and try to reach some kind of consensus. Thank you. -- Mdd (talk) 14:45, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Your edits to date pages[edit]

Your edits to April 22[edit]

Dear 192.109.190.88,
Information.svg Some of your edits on the page April 22 have been undone by PseudoBot, a robot built to keep the date pages tidy. The problems are:

The person you added doesn't seem to have a Wikipedia page.

If the page exists, check that you've spelled and capitalized the name the same way as the article, and try again. If it doesn't yet exist, read this page carefully before creating it. In particular, you shouldn't create a page about yourself or anyone you know personally. If this bot has got it wrong (as can unfortunately happen), please accept its author's apologies, and (if you would like) leave a message on this talk page with the details, so it can be improved. Please see this page for help. PseudoBot (talk) 11:59, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

May 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you recently made an edit to BMW 5 Series (F10) that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Jim1138 (talk) 07:14, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

June 2013[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Faizan. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to List of shopping centres in the United Kingdom, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Faizan 13:30, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

July 2013[edit]

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Ezequiel Garay, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 155blue (talk) 13:51, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  JoJan (talk) 15:28, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2013[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Technopat. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Diesel particulate filter have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Technopat (talk) 09:29, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kelly McGonigal (September 21)[edit]

AFC-Logo Decline.svg
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.


Teahouse logo
Hello! 192.109.190.88, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

October 2013[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Besieged. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Assassin's Creed IV: Black Flag, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. besiegedtalk 00:50, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Whisperback[edit]

You have new message/s Hello. You have a new message at Kudpung's talk page. 01:25, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, 192.109.190.88. You have new messages at Besieged's talk page.
Message added 19:11, 3 October 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I've left you an explanation and guide to adding reflinks and citations, and my thanks for your efforts! Also, I'm removing the vandalism warning :) besiegedtalk 19:11, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Meta-discussion about AC4BF release-date editing saga[edit]

[TL;DR: you can totally ignore this message, forever, and nothing bad will happen because of it -- yay! -- so no worries if you are busy with other things.] Hi, sorry to bother you. I am interested in how to improve civility and communication on wikipedia, and have started a topic which uses some of your recent edits (by chance) as a case-study. If you would like to make sure I am not saying anything unfair about you, or mischaracterizing the situation, it is over here. User_talk:Kudpung#Assassin.27s_Creed_Black_Flag_PS4 Please note that this is the talkpage of a reasonably high-level admin, Kudpung, who happened to be tangentially involved in the AC4BF difficulty. The reason the discussion is at their talkpage is because they are also deeply interested in helping improve the quality of adminship at wikipedia. In any case, I hope you are not unhappy that I selected some of your edits to use. I think that your behavior was fine, and I think that the end result was fine, and feel the same about the others involved, too. There are some places where I point out things person $foo might have done something better, but really and truly I'm just complaining about the flaws I see in the process, and the tools -- I think both need improvement, which is something that only high-level admins can help drive. Editors like you are not my reason for complaining; editors like you are my reason to celebrate.  :-) But wanting editing to be better, for myself and for other editors also, means openly discussing specifically where some improvements can be made, and how best to make them: policy changes, structural changes, programmatic bots, new tool design, et cetera. Anyways, if you are interested in that sort of discussion, you are welcome to visit the page above. If you have questions or complaints, you can reach me directly at my personal talkpage, over here. Thanks for making wikipedia better; see you around. 74.192.84.101 (talk) 07:49, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kelly McGonigal (2)[edit]

I want to apologize for the mixup with Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kelly McGonigal (2) and Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kelly McGonigal. See the notes on both pages for details. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 02:37, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Your edits to Erwin Schrödinger[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Petrb. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Erwin Schrödinger, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Petrb (talk) 12:26, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mr Moet (January 15)[edit]

AFC-Logo Decline.svg
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

March 2014[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Auric. Your recent edit to the page Fred Phelps appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The sentence relates to Shirley Phelps-Roper, not Fred Phelps. Auric talk 13:02, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.