User talk:

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Thank you for your feedback on John Gielgud. I have added info on the bequests from his estate and archive, much of which is with the British Library. If you wish to regularly edit, I'd suggest registering an account with Wikipedia as there has been vandalism associated with this IP address. If you have any questions please ask on my talk page. Thanks and best wishes Span (talk) 12:24, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

October 2013[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Oddbodz. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Tashkent clan, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Oddbodz (talk) 23:32, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Victoria Broackes (May 5)[edit]

AFC-Logo Decline.svg
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

Tibor Reich[edit]

I reverted your edit to Tibor Reich because the article is still written like an advert, and the principal author still appears to someone with a conflict of interest. These content tags are important because they draw attention of editors who can correct the deficiencies. Removing them will only get the article deleted. —teb728 t c 08:25, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Victoria Broackes[edit]

I modified your draft article on Victoria Broackes. You had placed the real references after the reflist, which meant that they were not displayed. I moved them inline in the body of the article.

Before you resubmit the article for review, you need to improve the references: Too many of them are to the V&A; so they are not the kind of independent sources that Wikipedia wants. And most of them do not even mention Ms. Broackes's association with the project.

I hope this helps. —teb728 t c 08:36, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Victoria Broackes concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Victoria Broackes, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Victoria Broackes[edit]

Hello It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Victoria Broackes".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Victoria Broackes}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Puffin Let's talk! 20:18, 8 February 2015 (UTC)