User talk:194.203.201.92

CheckUser evidence has determined that this IP address (or network) has been used abusively. This address (or network) has been blocked temporarily or permanently to prevent further abuse. In extreme cases, an entire network may be blocked to prevent an abusive user from continually changing their IP address in order to evade blocks or abusing multiple accounts. If you are a registered user and are seeing this message, please follow these instructions. Administrators: CheckUsers are privy to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy, and therefore must be consulted before this block can be removed. Users: If you already have an account in good standing, you may request IP block exemption to bypass this block. Post an unblock request to your user talk page.

This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

194.203.201.92 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock)

---

Request reason:

have gone through contibs for this ip and see no vandalism. ip did revert some material related to a polish singer but the version now appears to be used and approved. can someone explain where the vandalism is?

Decline reason:

The vandalism was caused by multiple accounts ehich used this IP address. This information is only available to highly trusted users who have the checkuser ability. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:19, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first and then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you abuse this procedure by making too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page as long as you are blocked.

This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

194.203.201.92 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock)

---

Request reason:

That doesn't make sence, this is a shared IP address so multiple users would use it? So you are saying this IP was blocked becuase multiple users were using a shared IP? Does this mean that every shared IP is blocked? I thought it was wiki policy to block users who vandalise and not to block shared IPs

Decline reason:

No, it was blocked because a single person created multiple accounts and used them from this IP address. It is an unfortunate fact that we must do this to public IP addresses, but when a person is engaged in disruptive edits using multiple accounts, the only way to stop the, is to block their (usually public) IP address for long periods of time. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 12:41, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first and then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you abuse this procedure by making too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page as long as you are blocked.

This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

194.203.201.92 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock)

---

Request reason:

It is a business network, so I assume it is someone on my network? I will try to create an account on another computer to get around this problem. Thanks

Decline reason:

not a unblock reason but glad to hear it— Jac16888 (talk) 18:55, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first and then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you abuse this procedure by making too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page as long as you are blocked.

This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

194.203.201.92 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock)

---

Request reason:

I like to keep anon and don't want an account. I see no vandalism in the contribs? can someone explain why we can't edit?

Decline reason:

Every time you use the {unblock} template, you summon a busy administrator to address your problem. For that reason, it is unhelpful for you to use the unblock template to ask questions which have already been answered. In cases where the unblock template is used excessively, admins often protect a talk page from further edits. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:32, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first and then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you abuse this procedure by making too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page as long as you are blocked.

This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

194.203.201.92 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock)

---

Request reason:

I only requested the above unblock template because when i tried to edit it told me to request it. This IP is used by over 2000users. I'm sorry that your busy but that is what happens when you block 2000+ users for no apparent reason.

Decline reason:

The pretend-ignorance is growing tiresome. Declined again and talk page now protected against further abuse. — ➨ ❝ЯEDVERS❞ a sweet and tender hooligan 12:44, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first and then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you abuse this procedure by making too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page as long as you are blocked.

July 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Lambeth Walk has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Until It Sleeps ^{Wake me} 12:20, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

January 2010

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Enterprise system worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Sarrandúin ^{[ Talk + Contribs ]} 07:57, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

January 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Geoff Bullock. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. StAnselm (talk) 21:11, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2011

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Don't Stop Believin', you may be blocked from editing without further notice. TJRC (talk) 00:26, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

November 2011

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to List of Pixar films , even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 07:58, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

---