User talk:198.188.96.4

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

February 2009[edit]

Information.png Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to 62nd British Academy Film Awards has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. -- Mentifisto 01:00, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Concerning Farda Gadirov[edit]

You should bring this up on the talk-page.... Lectonar (talk) 07:56, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

October 2009[edit]

Information.png Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page The Lady, or the Tiger? has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Tiderolls 22:50, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Information.png Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page List of California street gangs has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Netalarmtalk 20:50, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Information.svg Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Lynwood, California. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 21:36, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

November 2009[edit]

Information.svg Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Gibbon. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. LovesMacs (talk) 22:40, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information.svg Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Street racing. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.--Dbratland (talk) 20:19, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

March 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to No Country for Old Men (film), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Bento00 (talk) 02:11, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2010[edit]

Information.svg

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Nursing, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Nursing was changed by 198.188.96.4 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2010-04-27T20:57:22+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 20:57, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Information.svg Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Nursing. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Tommy2010 20:58, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Nuvola apps important.svg Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Thaksin Shinawatra, you may be blocked from editing. -- Boing! said Zebedee 21:18, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

October 2010[edit]

Information.png Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Parkinson's disease has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. KGasso (talk) 16:26, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

December 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Stanley Crouch has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. the wub "?!" 20:50, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Stanley Crouch constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk | Sign 21:00, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

November 2011[edit]

Please do change articles to present your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 20:55, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Bosnian pyramids has been reverted.
Your edit here to Bosnian pyramids was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xzDY0EBvCbU&feature=player_embedded) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 21:58, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring after a review of the reverts you have made on Bosnian pyramids. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively.

Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that:

  1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dougweller (talk) 22:18, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
[1] [2] --Ronz (talk) 01:25, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Bosnian pyramids. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Please note the talk-page consensus on these issues. Haploidavey (talk) 18:28, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Acroterion (talk) 18:55, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Tărtăria tablets, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. RashersTierney (talk) 18:58, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
The unsourced, ungrammatical insertion of personal analysis from this IP has been going on for some time. Continued activity of this kind may result in the long-term blocking of this address. Acroterion (talk) 19:15, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring after a review of the reverts you have made on Tiwanaku. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively.

Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that:

  1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. There is a section in the Tiwanaku talk page for the specific discussion of the edits that you propose making. Paul H. (talk) 19:41, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Dating of Tiwanaku[edit]

Mr. or Mrs. 198.188.96.4, if you would look at the talk page for Tiwanaku, you will see that Posnansky's dating of Tiwanaku has been discussed in great detail and that it has been overwhelming rejected as being very badly flawed and quite worthless. At this time, his dating of Tiwanaku is only accepted by various fringe and alternative authors, who ignore numerous radiocarbon dates and other research that completely discredits Posnansky (1945)'s badly flawed attempt at dating the site. Go see:

Augustyniak, S., 2005, Dating the Tiwanaku State: Analisis Cronologico del Estado Tiwanaku. Chungara, Revista de Antropología Chilena. vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 19-35.

Kelley, D. H., and E. F. Milone, 2002, Exploring Ancient Skies An Encyclopedic Survey of Archaeoastronomy. Springer Science+Business Media, Inc., New York, NY 616 pp

Kolata, A. L., 1993, The Tiwanaku: Portrait of an Andean Civilization. Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Kolata, Alan L., 2003, Tiwanaku and Its Hinterland: Archaeology and Paleoecology of an Andean Civilization, Vol. 2. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.

Ziólkowski, M., M. Pazdur, A. Krzanowski, and A. Michczynski, 1994, Andes. Radiocarbon database for Bolivia, Ecuador and Peru. Andean Archaeological Mission of the Institute of Archaeology, Warsaw University & Gliwice Radiocarbon Laboratory of the Institute of Physics, Silesian Technical University. Warszawa-Gliwice.Paul H. (talk) 17:34, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Keely and Milone (2002) above specifically found Posnansky (1945)'s dating of Tiwanaku to be "sorry example of misused archaeoastronomical evidence."

Also, Doug weller in the section about dating Tiwanaku noted:

“Here is what the geologist Paul Heinrich says about this: "A real mystery about the Tiwanaku Site is that Posnansky (1943) clearly knew how badly trashed the Tiwanaku Site was when he mapped it. Yet, he disregarded these obvious problems and tried to date the site using archaeoastronomical methods that he should have known would produce relatively meaningless results. He simplistically assumes without any hard evidence that astronomical alignments were unaltered by the destruction that the Tiwanaku site has suffered. He also assumes without either the benefit of inscriptions or any ethnographic or other data that buildings were astronomically aligned to a high degree precision in specific directions."”

Finally, the Tiwanaku: Early Civilization of the South American Continent and Ancient Civilizations BC are fringe sources that do not meet the Wikipedia standards for verifiability (WP:VERIFY). They are not reliable, published sources that can be used as Wikipedia sources.Paul H. (talk) 13:21, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

December 2011[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Passive–aggressive behavior. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. / edg 23:38, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

January 2012[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Mi'kmaq hieroglyphic writing, you may be blocked from editing. Dougweller (talk) 21:40, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Structural failure, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Jncraton (talk) 20:32, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

April 2012[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. --Ronz (talk) 18:55, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2012[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Iron pillar of Delhi, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. NeilN talk to me 16:24, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Iron pillar of Delhi[edit]

I've detailed issues with your edits here: Talk:Iron_pillar_of_Delhi#Edits_in_lede --NeilN talk to me 16:42, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Iron pillar of Delhi shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. NeilN talk to me 16:44, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
What was the point of this? --NeilN talk to me 16:54, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
Perhaps it was meant to serve the same purpose as this, since deleted. Haploidavey (talk) 17:06, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Iron pillar of Delhi shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Haploidavey (talk) 17:13, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Reported here for a 3RR violation. --NeilN talk to me 17:15, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for Edit warring on Iron pillar of Delhi, as well as a long history of general disruption. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 18:47, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2012[edit]

Hello, I'm KillerChihuahua. Your recent edit to the page Darwinism appears to have added incorrect information, so I removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, KillerChihuahua?!? 16:34, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. KillerChihuahua?!? 16:42, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2012[edit]

Hello, I'm Shadowjams. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Self-deception, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Shadowjams (talk) 22:07, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Iturbide, Nuevo León. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Torreslfchero (talk) 20:12, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Andrewman327. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Fourteen Points because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Andrew327 16:41, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Lichen may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 2 "[]"s. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:30, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lichen. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Plantsurfer (talk) 21:18, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2013[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Amnesia, you may be blocked from editing. Lova Falk talk 15:46, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2014[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm BethNaught. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to DeVon Franklin, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. BethNaught (talk) 18:27, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

May 2014[edit]

Information.svg Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edit to Social alienation constitutes vandalism and has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 22:33, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Information icon Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Social alienation with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. WadeSimMiser (talk) 22:35, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

August 2014[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Vieque. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Complex number because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Vieque (talkctb) 20:39, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2014[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Donner60. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Marisol Aguirre— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 20:43, 22 October 2014 (UTC)