User talk:

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Broom icon.svg

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I greatly appreciate your efforts to fight vandalism and make constructive edits on Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but many editors recommend that you create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address ( is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! Callanecc (talkcontribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 14:20, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

This was the original IP address that I hoped for. (talk) 15:32, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

July 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Battlefield Heroes, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Battlefield Heroes was changed by (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.949703 on 2012-07-07T11:13:39+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:13, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made to User talk:Tbhotch has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you. Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 16:50, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

At last, given warnings for two IP addresses who made errors and mistakes.[edit]

What I done was to revert two edits done by one IP address, and I issued a warning to these users not to try to do these errors. So I done what I could today. Please refer to the Wikipedia guides if you want to know about template messages. (talk) 19:42, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

I discovered a piece of equipment to combat vandalism.[edit]

Yes! I have found a program called WP CVN, which monitors edits to see which ones are vandalism and which ones should we revert. It's a useful kit for detecting vandalism before a user even reverts it. Once we think that someone vandalised that page, we can go to that article and just revert it. Simple as that. (talk) 18:45, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

I am submitting an edit request on a semi-protected article.[edit]

On 18 July 2012, I am submitting an edit request to Wikipedia administrators to add the word unlawful between the words includes and criminal damage. Let's see if the administrators will accept or deny the request. (talk) 14:31, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: European route E451[edit]

I declined your request for European route E451 to be speedily deleted. A lack of references is not a valid reason for an article to be speedily deleted, and the article is not patent nonsense. Since the article is not dependent on any other page, it does not fall under criterion G8 either. TheCatalyst31 ReactionCreation 09:48, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Your recent edits[edit]

Information.svg Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button Insert-signature.png or Button sig.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:53, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

SineBot, I mean that these pages are not part of the talk page, so that's why I don't need to sign these pages. (talk) 17:09, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

I am starting to build separate subpages.[edit]

In order not to make the main talk page too long, I have now decided to split each notice up into subpages. This is because the talk page might get vandalised in the future. (talk) 10:55, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Not that there's a specific rule against it, why are you making all these subpages in userspace of templates that already exist in template space or Wikipedia space? Generally, personal walled gardens of this kind are viewed with some concern if it's the only activity of that user on Wikipedia. Acroterion (talk) 11:36, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
I've deleted them all, since you haven't responded to the question above and because this kind of large-scale creation of subpages isn't appropriate for a named account, much less an IP sock account. Further attempts to avoid scrutiny by editing logged-out will result in more extensive restrictions. Acroterion (talk) 15:59, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Octagon delete.svg
This blocked user's request to have autoblock on his/her IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log) (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · edit filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Hto9950". The reason given for Hto9950's block is: "Vandalism".

Decline reason:

This IP and the blocked account are directly linked by this edit [1] and others to the IP userpage, and worse yet, this edit [2] You appear to be vandalizing, then warning yourself. There appears to be an attempt at using the named account as a bad-hand account and this IP address as a good-hand account. Is there any reason why I shouldn't change the block on the named account to indefinite and block this IP long-term? Acroterion (talk) 15:46, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Acroterion (talk) 18:44, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.