User talk:209.3.238.61

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

May 2013[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Darkwarriorblake. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Prometheus (2012 film) because it did not appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! You are edit warring over content, ignoring the WP: BRD policy, I told you to discuss it and you chose to be a dick instead. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 19:53, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Yintan. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Wilson Gale-Braddyll, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  Yinta 22:27, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I'm Comingdeer. I think we must clarify the idea of the "American Jesus" for the non-American reader before they can grasp the 'paradox' Bloom notes. My preference is the Bloom sentence- "The American Jesus, from the 19th century through now, is far closer to the wanderer of the Gospel of Thomas than to the crucified Jesus of the New Testament". Or perhaps the preceding sentence which includes the clause of the present article- "The 'living Jesus' of Thomas has been resurrected without the need of having first been sacrificed, which is the paradox also of the American Jesus". A paraphrase is welcome, 209.3.238.61, but why not let America's foremost man of letters make his point himself? The 'American Jesus' is anti-historical and anti-dogmatic which is perfectly in tune with the American national character --Church of the Rain (talk) 22:32, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Promethius[edit]

I agree, that speculative section on Promethius, the Liver and Greek medicine seems unlikely to add to the understanding or explication of the myth itself, On the other hand, our article on Liver has a section on Cultural allusions, with a passing reference to Promethius (currently uncited); that seems the logical place to receive it, trimmed down considerably, of course. Haploidavey (talk) 20:22, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Yes, this is certainly the case. And a good follow-up. 209.3.238.61 (talk) 15:58, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Irenaean theodicy[edit]

Hi there. I've undone the edit you keep doing to Irenaean theodicy, which asserts that John Hick introduced the theodicy, because it is misleading. I understand your concern, however, and have suggested a compromise on the talk page of the article. If you would like to participate in the discussion, please do so there - I'm sure we can reach a compromise. Also, you implied that I have special authority over the article in the edit summary. This is not true - although I watch the article and have spent a lot of time improving it, I have no additional authority over any other editors. ItsZippy (talkcontributions) 16:10, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

September 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Prometheus may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • stolen one beam of the celestial light [...] that the soul feels as if fastened by chains and [...} only death can release her bonds and carry her to the source of all knowledge."<ref>Ibid, p.54.</
  • LSJ]] entry [http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.04.0057%3Aentry%3Dh)pa%2Fomai {{lang|grc|ἠπάομαι}}] meaning ''mend'', ''repair''</ref> While others doubt the

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:44, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Talk:Max Weber shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Binksternet (talk) 21:08, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Prometheus in popular culture may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • LSJ]] entry [http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.04.0057%3Aentry%3Dh)pa%2Fomai {{lang|grc|ἠπάομαι}}] meaning ''mend'', ''repair''</ref> While others doubt the

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:20, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

I'm not sure what you want me to do, or can do. The Max Weber page is protected, so that issue has been resolved for now. Whom is the editor who you believe is at fault?

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, 209.3.238.61. You have new messages at ItsZippy's talk page.
Message added 20:40, 25 September 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

ItsZippy (talkcontributions) 20:40, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Notice[edit]

Information icon Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Angry reaction to my looking through edit history and fixing problems. Thank you. ItsZippy (talkcontributions) 09:27, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

October 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Takeshi Kitano may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • in the Fuji Television network archives. Further collaboration on IMDb Pro verified 1 Oct 2013.)</ref> and for the game show ''[[Takeshi's Castle]]'' (1986–1989).

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:06, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of one month for sock puppetry (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AutoMamet). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Bbb23 (talk) 20:09, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.