User talk:212.74.97.211

Your recent edit to Tony blair (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 13:44, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Apsley has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Thingg^⊕⊗ 15:00, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

July 2008

Your edits to November 10

Dear 212.74.97.211,
Some of your edits on the page November 10 have been undone by PseudoBot, a robot built to keep the date pages tidy. The problems are:

The person you added doesn't seem to have a Wikipedia page.

If the page exists, check that you've spelled and capitalized the name the same way as the article, and try again. If it doesn't yet exist, read this page carefully before creating it. In particular, you shouldn't create a page about yourself or anyone you know personally. If this bot has got it wrong (as can unfortunately happen), please accept its author's apologies, and (if you would like) leave a message on this talk page with the details, so it can be improved. PseudoBot (talk) 03:47, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Welcome

Welcome

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address (212.74.97.211) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! Gaia Octavia Agrippa ^Talk | _Sign 20:24, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

November 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page List of action film actors has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Specs112 23:28, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Dressed to Kill (1980 film)

Plot sections do not require explicit sourcing because they are intended to be straight-forward descriptions of the film's story, and as such are sourced by the film itself. However, any analysis or commentary about the film, such as the remark you keep re-inserting about the "critically acclaimed" section with no dialogue, needs to be explicitly sourced with a citation from a reliable source. Even with that, though, it is not appropriate for such commentary to be in the plot section, as it belongs in a section about critical reception. Please do not re-insert it into the plot section, and do not use it elsewhere without a source. Thanks, Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:30, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Plot sections do not require explicit sourcing because they are intended to be straight-forward descriptions of the film's story, and as such are sourced by the film itself. However, any analysis or commentary about the film, such as the remark you keep re-inserting about the "critically acclaimed" section with no dialogue, needs to be explicitly sourced with a citation from a reliable source. Even with that, though, it is not appropriate for such commentary to be in the plot section, as it belongs in a section about critical reception. Please do not re-insert it into the plot section, and do not use it elsewhere without a source. Beyond My Ken (talk) 20:12, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

August 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Tibetan Blue Bear, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 20:40, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This warning is in error. The spurious information was added to the article by User:94.9.96.227 and then removed by this IP. It was then re-added by reversion by User:94.9.76.16 (obviously the same editor). I have removed it again. Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:19, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

---