User talk:216.80.119.92

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

August 2008[edit]

Stop hand nuvola.svg This is your only warning.
The next time you make a personal attack as you did at Talk:Intermittency, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Verbal chat 11:55, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

ANI Notice[edit]

Hello, 216.80.119.92. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

If you feel CH's comments should be removed, please justify on the AN/I thread, and please log into your account to do so. Thanks. Verbal chat 16:12, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits[edit]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button Button sig.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 16:21, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

September 2008[edit]

Stop hand nuvola.svg Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Fringe science. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. This edit is a direct copy/paste. NJGW (talk) 19:01, 20 September 2008 (UTC)


You lost capacity to argue rationally, and now are stating this nonsense?!? Copyright violation for citing a single sentence? You must be joking. EVEN IF YOU WERE RIGHT can't you rephrase the sentence instead of threatening me with the block? Do not abuse your administrative privileges. 216.80.119.92 (talk) 19:03, 20 September 2008 (UTC)


single words or a single sentence are not protected by copyright [1] 216.80.119.92 (talk) 19:27, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
These days, the mistake you made could have gotten you kicked out of graduate school, or at least an F in the class: wp:MOSQUOTE. The issue you are having with interpreting the chapter's meaning might have prevented you from gaining entry. NJGW (talk) 19:34, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
How comforting it is to meet such a self proclaimed expert on grading. Now that I know you, I feel more important. 216.80.119.92 (talk) 19:56, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
In addition, your british english highness may note that the engrish is only my second language, and i may not be as familiar with the quoted English's Wikipedia Manual of Style. 216.80.119.92 (talk) 20:00, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
Ah, I see then. Let me help you then; these things " " are called quotation marks. They go around quotes. Now you know, and knowing is half the battle. NJGW (talk) 20:15, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
You see, sometimes inline citations are used instead of quotes, and that's what I did.
The other half of the battle are people like you, who instead of simply fixing quotes (" "), cause all this nonsense above to appear and to waste Wikipedia's harddisk space, and my time. 216.80.119.92 (talk) 20:17, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
And unlike you who deletes my comments on your talk page, I keep your comments here for everyone to read. 216.80.119.92 (talk) 20:19, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
Sure you do. [2] [3] [4]. What a very transparent editor you are:[5]. NJGW (talk) 21:57, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
Surely User:NJGW you can understand the above sentence. I can see your comments are still above, while these comments are missing: [6][7] As for referenced deletions, they were responses for deletions of comments on talk pages of User:SesquipedalianVerbiage and User:Jehochman. They, just like You, delete comments they dislike immediately. Lakinekaki (talk) 00:15, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Sock puppetry[edit]

I believe you are using multiple accounts for the purpose of evading scrutiny of your activities, and to divide warnings up so you don't get blocked. It is apparent that you are Lakinekaki (talk+tagcontribsdeleted contribslogsfilter logblock userblock logSULCAcheckuser (log))[8]. Please restrict yourself to a single account for further editing activities, or else blocks will be placed. You have said that you can avoid detection by using multiple accounts.[9] No, you can't. That is not allowed. See Sockpuppetry for a full explanation. Jehochman Talk 22:05, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

To divide warnings? Your conspiracy theory is amusing and sad. Indeed I wrote I can avoid detection, IF I WANTED TO. Am I doing that? Your attitude is plain ridiculous. You are acting like a child with all these block threats. Don't get too affected by that little power you have as a Wikipedia administrator. Stop bothering me, and stop interacting with me. Lakinekaki (talk) 00:20, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
I am sorry for misunderstanding the situation and issuing a block warning where one was not needed. I regret the inconvenience. Jehochman Talk 02:31, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
Cool. I can finally focus on work. Consider my advice that warning can really be perceived as very rude. I don't want other editors to go thru same experience. Wikipedia really used to be a much more pleasant environment when I started editing a couple of years ago. Always talk first, warn later. And always look at the context. 216.80.119.92 (talk) 03:08, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Invitation[edit]

I have set up a fresh discussion thread on my talk page. Feel free to comment. Jehochman Talk 04:28, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Re: your post on my talk page[edit]

Using abusive words is absolutely unacceptable behavior when coming to WQA. If there are unfounded accusations of sockpuppetry etc. then yes, we can find a remedy to resolve the matter, even if this involves refactoring those comments, or even if it involves going to the next step. We need time to look into your complaint, but when you're using abusive language in the way that you have, none of us will (it's a non-negotiable requirement that users are civil in this process) - if you were to continue to use that sort of language, the result would be that your editing privilleges are revoked and your complaint isn't looked into. Is that what you want? Ncmvocalist (talk) 05:02, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Certainly not. I want the editor in question be held responsible, and I don't want to continue discussion on his talk page as he has a habit of removing comments from it. And BTW, being civil does not mean only not using bad words, but also behaving and talking in a civil and respectful manner, which other editor is not doing. 216.80.119.92 (talk) 05:12, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

A note[edit]

Hi,

Please have a look at my opinion here. If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me again. Thanks. fayssal - Wiki me up® 01:59, 23 September 2008 (UTC)


Thanks. As for my "can use multiple IP's" edit, it was rhetorical to show how absurd would be tagging my pages with all the random IP's that I use, and that BTW I don't even try to 'hide'. As you can see, I still use this same one. 216.80.119.92 (talk) 03:12, 23 September 2008 (UTC)