User talk:38.123.80.39

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your IP address, 38.123.80.39, is registered to Cogent Communications, probably on behalf of a school in Indiana, and may be shared by multiple users, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Network administrators or other parties wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Administrator comment: this IP likely belongs to Culver Academies, based on the deleted contributions history.

September 2011[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The North South Crew, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: The North South Crew was changed by 38.123.80.39 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952078 on 2011-09-21T19:46:26+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:46, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Knapping, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Knapping was changed by 38.123.80.39 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.948787 on 2011-10-03T14:30:49+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:30, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dudley Do-Right. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Dudley Do-Right was changed by 38.123.80.39 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.968292 on 2011-10-03T14:36:29+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:36, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. --Dэя-Бøяg 14:40, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Map. Wikipelli ^Talk 14:42, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Lettuce, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Dэя-Бøяg 14:53, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Ed (Edgar181) 14:56, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. --Mej ^(talk) 13:02, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Lucretia appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. Tgeairn (talk) 07:08, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Cincinnatus, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Cincinnatus was changed by 38.123.80.39 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.964769 on 2011-11-07T15:56:17+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:56, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cincinnatus with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Epbr123 (talk) 15:57, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Kristallnacht, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Kristallnacht was changed by 38.123.80.39 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.970172 on 2011-11-10T17:38:47+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:38, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012[edit]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Z. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 18:30, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Omnibus with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Joydeep (talk) 18:36, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to D. Calabe 1992 18:38, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 19:09, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012, continued[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Islamic views on David. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 14:17, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Islamic views on David, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Islamic views on David was changed by 38.123.80.39 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.923058 on 2012-02-23T14:29:43+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:29, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hockey Canada, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Denisarona (talk) 14:30, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Goldfish (snack), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Goldfish (snack) was changed by 38.123.80.39 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.961347 on 2012-03-01T01:20:10+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:20, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Adolescence. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Pinethicket (talk) 15:20, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue triggering the edit filter, you may be blocked from editing. Electric Catfish 00:16, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Sumerian language with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jim1138 (talk) 01:17, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 01:32, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2012[edit]

Hello, I'm Skamecrazy123. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Founding of Rome, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Skamecrazy123 (talk) 13:41, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Archaeology, you may be blocked from editing. Macedonian, a Greek (talk) 16:39, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for abuse of editing privileges. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 02:42, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Atethnekos. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Plantation economy because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Atethnekos (Discussion, Contributions) 18:33, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm Mz7. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Paul Schneider (actor), but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mz7 (talk) 02:59, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm Bentogoa. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Vitamin A, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Bentogoa (talk) 18:06, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. An edit that you recently made to Denmark ‎ seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Materialscientist (talk) 02:29, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm Oshwah. An edit you recently made to Liberalism in Canada seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:14, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Ethanol— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 19:26, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm 72. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Culver Academies— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —72 _{talk / contribs} 13:28, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Culver Academies. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. John from Idegon (talk) 23:25, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.