User talk:

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

GA nomination rules[edit]

Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia. I see that you are removing GA nominations on the grounds that nom has not worked on the article. However, this is not a requirement; the guidance says instead "Nominators who are not significant contributors to the article should consult regular editors of the article prior to a nomination." The criterion is therefore that either nom has edited significantly, or consultation should have occurred. May I suggest you take a break from removing GA nominations and check carefully with other editors whether nomination is acceptable in each case. Removal should only be a last resort; better to discuss it with both nom and the other leading editors in each case to work out a sensible resolution. Thanks, Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:57, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Removing nomination[edit]

I don't know why you are removing GA nominations by saying that nominator didn't worked on the article. It's not mandatory. Any one can nominate an article to GA. --Joseph 07:46, 28 December 2013 (UTC)