GA nomination rules
Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia. I see that you are removing GA nominations on the grounds that nom has not worked on the article. However, this is not a requirement; the guidance says instead "Nominators who are not significant contributors to the article should consult regular editors of the article prior to a nomination." The criterion is therefore that either nom has edited significantly, or consultation should have occurred. May I suggest you take a break from removing GA nominations and check carefully with other editors whether nomination is acceptable in each case. Removal should only be a last resort; better to discuss it with both nom and the other leading editors in each case to work out a sensible resolution. Thanks, Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:57, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
I don't know why you are removing GA nominations by saying that nominator didn't worked on the article. It's not mandatory. Any one can nominate an article to GA. --Joseph 07:46, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.