User talk:50.154.236.130

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

May 2013[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you recently removed some content without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Materialscientist (talk) 23:06, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Dominican Republic, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. – Wdchk (talk) 00:49, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Palo (religion). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Nacho Mailbox ★ 18:57, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Stop icon This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dominican Spanish, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Nacho Mailbox ★ 19:17, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Stop icon This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Jamaican Patois, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - BilCat (talk) 19:01, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Stop icon This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Jamaican Patois, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - BilCat (talk) 19:01, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Stop icon This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Black Dominican, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Nacho Mailbox ★ 19:04, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Dominican Spanish shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. - BilCat (talk) 16:17, 25 May 2013 (UTC)