User talk:50.200.47.2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

September 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Hello, I'm Oxfordwang. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Parkside High School, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Oxfordwang (talk) 16:46, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ramiyah. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Ramiyah was changed by 50.200.47.2 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.972503 on 2012-09-20T14:04:24+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:04, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Terraforming of Mars. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SeoMac (talk) 18:29, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Engineering design process, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Engineering design process was changed by 50.200.47.2 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.930661 on 2012-09-21T18:15:01+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:15, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012[edit]

Hello, I'm Wikipelli. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Charles I of England, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Wikipelli Talk 13:08, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ivan the Terrible with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Luckas (talk) 13:08, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sam Seder, you may be blocked from editing. SassyLilNugget (talk) 14:16, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sam Seder, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. SassyLilNugget (talk) 14:18, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. --Bongwarrior (talk) 13:18, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Legal status of tattooing in the United States with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. O.Koslowski (talk) 18:21, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Cold Sassy Tree, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Cold Sassy Tree was changed by 50.200.47.2 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.972765 on 2012-10-17T17:17:39+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:17, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Alexf(talk) 17:16, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm DVdm. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Acrophobia, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, DVdm (talk) 13:32, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of rivers by length. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: List of rivers by length was changed by 50.200.47.2 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.850543 on 2012-10-25T13:33:08+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:33, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Volga River, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Volga River was changed by 50.200.47.2 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.893298 on 2012-10-25T14:21:09+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:21, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Volga River, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. SassyLilNugget (talk) 14:24, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Predator (film), you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  KoshVorlon. We are all Kosh ...  19:09, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012[edit]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for abuse of editing privileges. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:15, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Wikipelli. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Banana chip, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Wikipelli Talk 13:37, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  gadfium 18:44, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/clemento concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/clemento, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 20:43, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Church reform of Peter the Great , without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 04:11, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Article One of the United States Constitution that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 18:40, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at History of personal computers, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Theroadislong (talk) 14:15, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/clemento[edit]

Hello 50.200.47.2. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "clemento".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/clemento}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 14:00, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm Discospinster. An edit you recently made to Butler Act seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ... discospinster talk 14:47, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 16:51, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2014[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Discospinster. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Stone Age— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ... discospinster talk 14:59, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism, as you did to Nobel Prize in Literature, will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia without further notice. Dwpaul Talk 13:31, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  gadfium 19:58, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016[edit]

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Salisbury, Maryland, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Toddst1 (talk) 19:21, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2016[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Optakeover. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Sport in Italy— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Optakeover(U)(T)(C) 12:05, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm NottNott. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Memorial Day seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -NottNott|talk Reply with {{re}} 12:30, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Battle of Trenton has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Widr (talk) 16:59, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2017[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Non-dropframe. An edit that you recently made to Michelle Alexander seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! —Non-Dropframe talk 16:58, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from attempting to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been disallowed by an edit filter. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 15:54, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:50.200.47.2&oldid=1141666158"