# User talk:66.102.80.212

## March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to White Russian has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN aka john lennon 19:21, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

How so? The OpenWRT pattern of naming major software versions after mixed drinks is well known, at least among anyone who has ever logged on to a OpenWRT installation. Both the White Russian and Kamikaze releases display the respective drink recipes to the console on telnet/SSH login. --66.102.80.212 (talk) 14:02, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

## One Sesame Street

My bad....you're right. However the mention of the station's street address is a bit irrelevant in the "city of license" article, don't you think? --CFIF 19:58, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

True, it seems OK to leave it out in this case - as it is a valid Plattsburgh address (and not México, the North Pole or something equally odd) it does match the community of license and therefore isn't terribly notable. --66.102.80.212 (talk) 20:00, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
In any case, there seems to be a pattern with these... Plattsburgh, New York already has "Television Drive" as WPTZ-TV's address, and "Sesame Street" for Mountain Lake PBS is just more of the same?

## April 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to .me has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. InvisibleDiplomat666 19:21, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

The ".me is about YOU" slogan is real, so don't blame .me if it is a bizarre choice of words. --66.102.80.212 (talk) 19:23, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
RE - It was unreferenced and unsourced. Please add more documentation next time. Thanks! You can help too, join project notability. --24.129.105.240 (talk) 19:28, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Reference is http://www.domain.me/ (the nation's domain registry itself) and the appropriate <ref> was provided. I'm not going to bother reverting this further, as the registry is as primary a source as is available for .me here. I also notice that you reverted any mention of .me from your user talk page, this is most impolite. --66.102.80.212 (talk) 19:31, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

you need a reliable source first.--Otterathome (talk) 16:31, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

## May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Uncyclopedia has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Creamy!Talk 17:15, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Unconstructive? I see no changes except to whitespace in the edit and your subsequent reversion. Please be specific as to why you wish to raise this as an issue on this page? --66.102.80.212 (talk) 17:30, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thank you. Prom3th3an (talk) 12:49, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

## June 2008

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive comments. ĤéĺĺвοЎ (talk) 10:13, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 07:45, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked for a period of 24 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. PeterSymonds (talk) 11:05, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

## Regarding article KCBS-TV and television stations in general

Thank you very much for offering your support and your backing to my position, even though my particular edits were not perfect. (Previous contributions of mine were entered under 67.180.133.135). I appreciate it. Please do me another favor of taking care not to get yourself into disfavor and difficulty. Television stations are important to our culture and they deserve the attention of all interested and knowledgable editors (like you), but your participation should not be hindered by "going to the mattresses" over any edit. I know this from experience.Lantana11 (talk) 02:43, 18 June 2008 (UTC)Lantana11Lantana11 (talk) 02:43, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

## Further Ruminations--

In no way should you hesitate to make edits that are factual and in good faith. And don't stop standing up for these edits, speaking your piece, and, if suddenly you find yourself ramming your head against a brick wall, save your energy and consult neutral third parties for advice and direction. If you're in the right you can be confident that, ultimately, the truth will out! Lantana11 (talk) 03:08, 19 June 2008 (UTC)Lantana11Lantana11 (talk) 03:08, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

## WXXW-LP

Your nomination at Articles for Creation was a success, and WXXW-LP was created. Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia, and please consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself. Thank you for helping Wikipedia! CredoFromStart talk 18:04, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

## TV

Hello. Judging by your edits, it seems you know a lot about and/or are interested about television broadcasting. I totally agree that we need to figure out the scope of each article regarding the North American digital television transition, including possible hurdles associated with the transition. These problems definitely need to be mentioned in the appropriate Wikipedia article. It seems you have your own opinions regarding these issues, but do be objective and remember not to give undue weight to a certain point of view. I took out most of the complaints section in CECB in part because it was way too long and gave undue weight to a certain viewpoint.

Thanks and happy editing! --Jtalledo (talk) 13:38, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

## July 2008

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

As far as I can tell, W47CK does use a MySpace page as its primary web presence. No idea why, but this has caused false-positives on this 'bot before. Where do I find a real human being around here? --66.102.80.212 (talk) 11:24, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

## Register!

I placed a notice about the loon posting conspiracy theories in DTV transition, and an admin protected the page instead of going after the loon: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Tinfoil_hat-type_at_DTV_transition. Unfortunately, that blocks you from editing the article, which is not what I wanted. To save yourself from this hassle in the future, I strongly recommend you register an account -- after a waiting period of four days, you'll be able to edit so-called "semi-protected" articles (like DTV is right now). It also hides your IP from the world, which is a benefit.

In the meantime, I'll implement the request you made on the talk page of DTV transition.--Father Goose (talk) 00:33, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

## User talk:Black Waves sockpuppet case needs more convincing data

Hello 66.102. I saw your posting at ANI. Were you intending to create a Suspected Sockpuppet report at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Rollosmokes? It does not exist yet. With only three edits it is hard to make a diagnosis of sockpuppetry yet, unless one or more of these changes is a trademark of Rollosmokes. So far nobody has reverted his edits to WNAC-TV. User:Fish Man added a citation in response to this editor's tagging of WVUE, which suggests that his change might have been a good-faith edit. EdJohnston (talk) 23:39, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

The changes did pretty much all just reinstate edits which Rollo had made before being blocked, and one of Rollo's trademark patterns (removing digital TV info) is there. User:Rollosmokes posted "Goodbye, Wikipedia" on July 19'th, the edits from the new account User:Black Waves are all timestamped July 20'th and all are hitting the same articles Rollo was editing before he was blocked. Now to see if he restarts the CW vs. The CW, the edit war for which he was blocked, or one of the other identifying patterns; that would be all that'd be needed to establish this as a solid SSP incident. Wait and see, I guess. --66.102.80.212 (talk) 23:52, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
He admitted the sock/meatpuppetry and has been blocked and reverted. —Wknight94 (talk) 11:39, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

It isn't helpful for the template to provide a link to the IC database's blank search page, and then require the user to manually re-enter the call sign they're looking for. The whole point of the Recnet template is that it bypasses Recnet's search page and goes directly to the search result for the station's call sign. So unless you can figure out how to go directly to a search result in the IC database instead of the search page, then the IC link doesn't belong in the template at all. Bearcat (talk) 02:12, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Unfortunately, the RECnet link doesn't seem to work at all at the moment. As such, IC seems to be the only usable site until/unless REC comes back up? --66.102.80.212 (talk) 02:20, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
The problem is that the way the IC database is structured, search results don't actually provide distinct URLs that can be directly linked to as external links. The URL of the results page is always just https://sd.ic.gc.ca/pls/engdoc_anon/web_search.call_sign_results, no matter what the search term was. The user can only go to the main search entry page, enter the call sign themselves, manually select each attribute that they want to see (even the call sign doesn't actually come up in the search result if you don't manually select it), click on "find" and wait up to two minutes because the IC database is painfully slow at the best of times. I agree that it's not ideal, especially when Recnet is down, but IC just doesn't work in a way that's compatible what we need the template for. Bearcat (talk) 02:30, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

## Re: WNYF (Fox 28)

As Strafidlo appears to be out, I can answer this for him. According to the FCC, WNYF-CA is allotted 2,610kW, while WNYF-LP is allotted 950kW. Whether those stations actually use that much power is up to that station. What the official power (according to the FCC) is, we put down on the infobox for each page, which Strafidlo did. Hope this answers your concern. If you have further questions, please feel free to ask. Take Care.... 01:55, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
Hello, 66.102.80.212. You have new messages at Strafidlo's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

## Restoration of TV region templates

Please stop restoring these template until we can check the status of the DMCA Takedown Notice from Nielsen Media Research (OTRS ticket #2008091610055854). Thanks, OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:29, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

This issue was one that was addressed a month ago. The templates which were deleted contained info like "Glendive, Montana is the 210th biggest most fantabulous metropolis in America, based on Nielsen DMA". The new templates omit any reference to Nielsen or these stats. No idea why you want to re-open this question now. --66.102.80.212 (talk) 17:31, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
With the work you are doing on the TV region templates (a big Thanks, BTW), I encourage you to get an account. - NeutralHomerTalk • October 25, 2008 @ 18:30

## the Welcome you never got.... =)

Welcome!

Hello, 66.102.80.212, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, and I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a brief smattering of pages that you might find helpful:

You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address (66.102.80.212) is used to identify you instead.

Anyway, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically put a standardized signature on whatever you just typed. If you need any help, try one of these four things: click on the blue "17" in my signature and browse through the links, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and place {{helpme}} before the question. Cheers!

Ed 17 for President Vote for Ed 02:44, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

## Template:SUX TV

Please stop changing this from a redirect to an actual template. There is already a template for this area called Template:Sioux City TV. Also, the market is too small for any geographical division, especially since Sioux City is the only main city, and all stations serve Sioux City. -- azumanga (talk) 00:50, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

The market crosses at least two state lines. I have no idea why you keep reverting to an old version of the template to one that combines them, or why you keep trying to move the template to some other name. --66.102.80.212 (talk) 14:48, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
The fact that the market covers THREE states (not two) is irrelevant to the location of the stations. The articles themselves already refer to the station's locations. The fact that all stations serve Sioux City makes grouping by state moot. Many markets, including NYC, Toledo and Kansas City, also straddle two or more states, and Sioux City should not be treated any differently. -- azumanga (talk) 16:25, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
NYC is split into a huge number of multiple sections already, based on content and language. If you were to propose to lump everything together as "group1 = stations" there, I'd expect you to be reverted there too. --66.102.80.212 (talk) 16:36, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
However, splitting things up for a market that small makes no sense. I suggest taking this up with WP:TVS. -- azumanga (talk) 16:40, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
The division between Sioux City, Iowa and South Sioux City, Nebraska is unnecessary, as the two communities are contiguous, and all stations serving South Sioux City also serve the major community of Sioux City. Sioux Falls stations should not be listed specifically in this template. That includes KUSD, as its primary focus is Sioux Falls, not Sioux City, even though its COL is closer to Sioux City. dhett (talk contribs) 09:10, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

## Domain hack

Any idea why the "who.is" server is being labelled as spam? Are you a 'bot?  :) --66.102.80.212 (talk) 03:06, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
Look at the provided diff. I see not reason to add a second link to the reference. --Ronz (talk) 19:44, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

## WDPM-DT

I'm well aware of what PSIP says, but if you'd seen what I've seen about Daystar and PSIP compliance (or lack thereof), you wouldn't be so quick to jump on it. That's why I left out any mapping information when I created the page so many months ago. Knowing Daystar, they'll probably start trashing WSRE-DT by mapping to 23-1 as well. I've seen the transport streams of KRMT and KWDK, the former was just completely broken for a long time (only recently got sorted) and the latter has no PSIP at all. I have no qualms with noting it, but it may not be accurate, even if it technically should be. TripEricson (talk) 07:41, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

I think I've worded this carefully enough to say that "the spec says they should be on this virtual channel", without any speculation as to whether this will be configured properly when it eventually does sign on. That way, when they mess this up, the original "the spec says they should be mapped 31.1, per A/65 Annex B..." is still technically valid. It's about all that can be done, given that the station isn't live yet and there are no transport streams to examine. --66.102.80.212 (talk) 22:26, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

## December 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Pop culture influenced by Sesame Street has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. rootology (C)(T) 21:41, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

I've taken the matter to the relevant talk page. I'd suggest that you do likewise instead of misusing templates intended for use in response to straightforward page-vandalism incidents. --66.102.80.212 (talk) 22:47, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to List of television stations in British Columbia has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Igoldste (talk) 01:18, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Um, your removal of all listed digital TV channel info from every station in Vancouver is constructive *how* exactly? --66.102.80.212 (talk) 04:56, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

## Weather Plus

Gannett's NBC stations (WXIA, KARE, KPNX, KSDK, KUSA, WBIR, WCSH, WGRZ, WKYC, WLBZ, WTLV) are all still carrying Weather Plus. A decision has yet to be made by corporate as to what to replace it with. I have first hand knowledge of this, as I work for one of the affiliates (WXIA). --Mhking (talk) 04:23, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

## WWJ-TV

Hello. You recently added the following to the article WWJ-TV:

"The use of a three-letter callsign on a UHF TV station is rare as these date from the earliest days of AM radio broadcasting; Harrisburg CBS affiliate WHP-TV and Wisconsin Public Television WHA-TV (both UHF 21) are the two others to identify in this manner."

Actually, this is the result of WJBK's change of network affiliation from CBS to FOX (forcing CBS to purchase what was formerly WGPR channel 62), and the reassignment of the old WWJ-TV callsign (originally given to channel 4 in Detroit) to channel 62. Thomprod (talk) 19:22, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

As far as I know, channel 4 was WDIV before the CBS programming was moved from 2 to 62. It's CBS's ownership of WWJ (AM) news radio that entitles them to use WWJ-TV on the UHF TV station if it's not in use elsewhere. While historically there was a common ownership between WWJ radio and TV4 at one point, that was many years ago. --66.102.80.212 (talk) 19:35, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
You're right. I just wanted to clarify that the WWJ-TV callsign was originally assigned to a VHF station (channel 4). Thomprod (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 19:56, 23 December 2008 (UTC).

Are you going to write about Tuck analysis, too? Or how about a citation of that recent case where the two Democratic commissioners dissented and effectively said "we know what you're up to, M Street lawyers", which cited a bunch of precedent for how these requirements have changed? 121a0012 (talk) 17:02, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

That would be this, I presume? ;) --66.102.80.212 (talk) 22:26, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

## January 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Digital television in Canada has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoygabsadds 19:53, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

## Black president (United States)

Hello! Thank you for your edits to Timeline of the american civil rights movement (the name I originally gave the article, now a redirect). However, I see that someone put up Black president (United States) - would you mind going to it, and then voicing your opinion on the discussion page by clicking on "this article's entry"? Thanks again! Simesa (talk) 10:26, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Beebe Plain has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Optakeover(Talk) 11:52, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

## February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to WTTW has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. -download | sign! 05:33, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

The edit is valid; the text in question was a duplicate copy of references already included elsewhere in the same page with <ref> tags. In future, please be more careful before reverting valid changes. --66.102.80.212 (talk) 05:35, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Consider using edit summaries more routinely to avoid these knee-jerk warnings and reverts.--Father Goose (talk) 06:57, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

## Television stations

A television station's article is not supposed to contain more than one infobox. I agree that the current situation handles the defunct/converted-to-retransmitter stations very poorly, but splitting them up so that a single article has two separate infoboxes on it at the same time isn't the way to go, because the basic formatting rule is one infobox per article only. Bearcat (talk) 18:52, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

The problem with using one infobox is that there are two separate licenses involved, so legally they're not the same station. If CJSS-TV folds and sells its transmitter to CJOH-TV-8, legally CJOH-8 is under CJOH-TV's license and is not simply the former CJSS-TV with another network affiliation. A simple retransmitter normally fails notability to get an article of its own (they would be grouped with the corresponding originating station), but a defunct station which historically did originate content does qualify for inclusion as its own article. --66.102.80.212 (talk) 18:57, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
I agree, but the solution is to rewrite the articles so that the single infobox and the introduction properly denote what the article actually is about, not to add double infoboxes. Bearcat (talk) 19:04, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
The articles were being rewritten in such a way as to remake CJSS-TV's page into an article on CJOH-TV-8, and to make similar changes to other defunct-station articles such as the MCTV twinstick and the Saskatchewan CBC affiliates. An article on the historical (but defunct) CJSS-TV is a valid topic for a page. An article on CJOH-TV-8 is not, as we already have a CJOH-TV article and the rebroadcaster originates nothing. Jamming CJSS-TV's infobox full of info on the soon-to-be-defunct CJOH repeater (removing info on the original station, such as ownership) knocks the page off-topic rather badly. --66.102.80.212 (talk) 19:10, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
That's what I'm saying — the solution is to take the inappropriate information, the stuff that's about CJOH-TV-8 rather than CJSS-TV, off the article instead of adding a second infobox. Bearcat (talk) 19:23, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

## March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page CJSS-TV has been reverted.

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

## July 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to .so has been reverted, as it appears to introduce incorrect information. Please do not intentionally add incorrect information to articles. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for testing. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. ZooFari 22:37, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

I just tried http://nic.so - all I get is a DNS error. It does not resolve; http://www.nic.so also returns an unrouteable address.--66.102.80.212 (talk) 22:38, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

## History of converter boxes

This [3] may interest you.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 20:20, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

## November 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page WICA-TV has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://radiodxer.bravehost.com/WICA.html (matching the regex rule \bbravehost\.com).
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://radiodxer.bravehost.com/wrlp.html (matching the regex rule \bbravehost\.com).
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://radiodxer.bravehost.com/MPATI.html (matching the regex rule \bbravehost\.com).
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to WFUN (AM). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. 4twenty42o (talk) 02:09, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Keep it up.. - 4twenty42o (talk) 02:41, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

## Re: CKLI

With regards to my edit at CKLI-FM, I was only reverting unconstructive edits and didn't notice changing the date (back) to 2002. I can't see any reason for the date to be 2002, so I have changed it back to 2009 myself. -M.Nelson (talk) 22:34, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

## Your submission at Articles for creation

Your nomination at Articles for Creation was a success, and WROV-TV was created.

• The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
• Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia, and please consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.
• If you would to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia! Bradjamesbrown (talk) 04:59, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

## DYK for WROV-TV

 On January 3, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article WROV-TV, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Wizardman Operation Big Bear 06:00, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

## KAXT-CD

It's funny you mention it, they have an electronic program guide with The Cool TV in a small window, or they did last time I checked. Go figure. You can see it in the first row here (click the pics to expand): http://www.silicondust.com/hdhomerun/lineup_web/US:95101#lineup_1418002 TripEricson (talk) 15:05, 19 June 2010 (UTC)