User talk:

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

April 2008[edit]


Hi, the recent edit you made to Agriculture of Cuba has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Thingg 22:09, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi, you stated in the Whampoa Military Academy article discussion: The article is essentially written from an enthusiastic Chinese nationalist point of view, and is filled with unsubstantiated claims.

Can you please give some examples confirming your opinion?--Happy udo (talk) 18:55, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Information.svg Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Defender of torch (talk) 10:40, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Wife selling[edit]

"This article is wry and witty, but it does appear to be an April Fool's Joke. Next year, we'll have a history of the Italian spaghetti harvest and the cultivation of spaghetti vines. And potato trees. And how to pick peanuts."

It is entirely true. For April Fool's Day, we just take the strangest articles and deliberately make their main page blurbs misleading. --S-man (talk) 21:25, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

James Bamford and Israeli animal spy conspiracy theories[edit]

Hi 68,

I removed the part of your edit in which you referred to Bamford as a conspiracy theorist. I don't know much about Bamford, but I think you should provide a citation if you refer to someone that way. Thanks, Qrsdogg (talk) 23:55, 22 January 2011 (UTC)