User talk:72.87.117.10

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


December 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Arkansas, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Arkansas was changed by 72.87.117.10 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.957353 on 2010-12-14T16:42:24+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:42, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011[edit]

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Solar chemical. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you can write practically anything you want. Metiscus (talk) 20:04, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Daylighting has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. JDCMAN (talk) 19:01, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Nitrogen group, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Vrenator talk 15:15, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Cuban Revolution, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Cuban Revolution was changed by 72.87.117.10 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.936653 on 2012-02-27T14:15:30+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:15, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cuban Revolution. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Vrenator talk 16:56, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Rikki-Tikki-Tavi, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Rikki-Tikki-Tavi was changed by 72.87.117.10 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.964398 on 2012-04-10T18:09:12+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:09, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

November 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Stew was changed by 72.87.117.10 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.980101 on 2012-11-28T15:30:43+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:30, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Eric Garrett. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Eric Garrett was changed by 72.87.117.10 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.86531 on 2012-11-28T15:36:48+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:36, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mary (mother of Jesus), you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Mary (mother of Jesus) was changed by 72.87.117.10 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.91048 on 2012-11-28T15:39:48+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:39, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Eric Garrett, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- Wywin (talk|contribs) 15:46, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

March 2013[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Religion in Mesopotamia with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Widr (talk) 19:20, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Religion in Mesopotamia with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Widr (talk) 19:25, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Cation-exchange capacity has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 21:48, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Gaia Octavia Agrippa. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to OP, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk 16:59, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hitler family with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. --Slazenger (Contact Me) 19:50, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 3 March[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:41, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to OP has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: OP was changed by 72.87.117.10 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.853423 on 2014-12-04T18:09:25+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:09, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at OP with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Winner 42 Talk to me! 15:42, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Nitrogen cycle has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:34, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Turkey, you may be blocked from editing. Timothy Robinson12345 (talk) 12:52, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome![edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Someone using this IP address, 72.87.117.10, has made unconstructive edits to Turkey, which have been reverted. If you did this, in the future please try to contribute in a more constructive manner. If you'd like to experiment with the syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles. If you did not do this, you may wish to consider getting a username to avoid confusion with other editors.

You don't have to log in to read or edit pages on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free, requires no personal information, and has many benefits. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you.

Some good links for newcomers are:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Again, welcome! Timothy Robinson12345 (talk) 13:01, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you![edit]

HI

Timothy Robinson12345 (talk) 13:12, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Redtmr, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Timothy Robinson12345 (talk) 13:30, 13 October 2016 (UTC) [reply]

A sock puppet is someone who uses multiple accounts to contribute in a disruptive way, mainly to make it appear like there are many different people contributing. It's also a term used for users who have been banned, then created new accounts to circumvent that block. Please read the notice carefully, and follow the links in it to make yourself familiar with the allegations, and defend against the claims if you wish. —Hexafluoride Ping me if you need help, or post on my talk 21:53, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Knarr, you may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 15:53, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

72.87.117.10 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I think I was unfairly blocked I was warned one time. 72.87.117.10 (talk) 17:05, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

A history of vandalism going back six years. Many, many warnings. And you've provided absolutely no reason to believe the vandalism will permanently stop. The block is appropriate. Yamla (talk) 17:10, 8 December 2016

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

72.87.117.10 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have learned my lesson im very sorry 72.87.117.10 (talk) 14:36, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That's not quite enough to warrant an unblock. As stated earlier, there's a history of vandalism going back at least six years. Yes you're sorry, but that's not enough. If you do want to contribute productively, wait for a few months, come back, explain what you'd like to work on and maybe this will be reconsidered. As for now, this is declined RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:41, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I agree[edit]

You have not shown any improvement over the last few months. I would wait to send another unblock request or you might not be able to edit your talk page. --Lt Timothy Robinson (talk) 13:47, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Wham!— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 16:37, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits to Wikipedia pages, such as the one you made with this edit to Rugrats, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 16:41, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at WONY.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Cocohead781 (talk) 16:51, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2017[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Super Mario Bros. 2— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 17:15, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Harry Baals. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. SunilNevlaFan✨ 18:13, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023[edit]

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Teahouse, you may be blocked from editing. David Biddulph (talk) 18:45, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:72.87.117.10&oldid=1139127148"