|Threads older than 30 days may be archived by.|
Hello 7Sidz, This is J.R. Council (talk) 19:28, 10 November 2014 (UTC) Jim Council. I am the professor in History and Systems of Psychology at North Dakota State University. The stage-crisis article is an educational project to improve psychology content on Wikipedia, and is being conducted with the blessing and assistance of the Wiki Education Foundation. I've put a banner to that effect up on the article's talk page. Please give me a chance to review the changes and the reasons you reverted the page. I certainly don't want my students to get in wiki wars over their projects. I'm sure we can resolve this issue to everyone's satisfaction. Thanks, Jim J.R. Council (talk) 19:28, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
- Hello again. Please note that I have a Ph.D. in psychology and have taught psychology for almost 30 years, including developmental psychology. I am familiar with Levinson's theory. I have reviewed the article, and I believe the article as you have reverted it is very sketchy, and definitely a stub that needs improvement. Please be specific as to why you felt it necessary to revert the article, and which rules of Wikipedia it violated. I am sure there is some middle ground which should satisfy all involved. I am also contacting a highly experienced editor for his opinion. Thank you, Jim Council J.R. Council (talk) 19:55, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
- Hi there, 7Sidz. I just offering my opinion based on what I see here. James Council is right to express concern; I don't see any explanation for your reversion of the content in question, and looking at the the content itself, I don't see any obvious reason why it is problematic. If you have some rationale for it, please let us know (probably the talk page is more appropriate) so we can discuss it further. I, JethroBT drop me a line 19:17, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi,you reverted an edit which you said was not helpful. I replaced the image with one that I considered to be of higher quality 22.214.171.124 (talk) 14:51, 23 January 2015 (UTC)Charles Heloo again - just noticed I wasn't logged in. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:57, 23 January 2015 (UTC)Charles
- I've been going over your contributions, and I see that you're working hard to revert vandalism. That's great, thank you for that. Meanwhile, I also noticed that you're going extremely fast, and you are making some sloppy mistakes here and there. I'd like to ask you to take a little more time and care for your edits - and the end result will be much better for it. Kind regards, Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 18:10, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- 7Sidz, I'm coming here again because I'm noticing problems in your contributions again. Please be more mindful of your edits.  is not correct,  gives the wrong reason,  gives the wrong reason as well. It's great that you want to be as efficient as possible in helping out, but giving users nonsense warnings for the wrong thing is not OK. Continuing the way you are editing now is not acceptable, and easily avoided if you just take some more time. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 16:00, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Mt edits to Karl Chandler (comedian) have been requested by Karl Chandler himself, who is an Australian comedian.