User talk:81.102.15.200

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
System-users.svg An editor has expressed concern that this IP address has been used by blocked user Samlaptop85213.
Please refer to contributions or the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer for evidence. See block log and current autoblocks.

You do now. :-)

However, I'm going to delete the page you created since it's not an article. You can use the sandbox for testing. Cheers, Evercat 13:36, 1 Mar 2004 (UTC)


Welcome!

Hello, 81.102.15.200, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  -- Longhair | Talk 10:38, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Sjakkalle (Check!) 12:54, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

OK I remember you hitting up on Thatcher a few days ago. Knock it off. 68.39.174.238 09:01, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

March 2006[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamieTalk 16:59, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed content from David Cameron. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. --james(talk) 12:58, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to David Cameron[edit]

Your recent edit to David Cameron (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 12:59, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Stop hand.png

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to David Cameron, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Alex9891 13:00, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

DONT BLOCK THIS IP AS IT IS CAMBRIDGE CITY LIBRARY, UK

Stop hand.png

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Geoffrey Lawler, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Zoz (t) 15:30, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to FC Bayern Munich. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. --Wildnox(talk) 16:14, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Regarding edits made 13 March 2007 to 209radio[edit]

Information.svg Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Kntrabssi 10:50, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

I am confused as to why adding a catagory to 209radio was removed and is considered "unhelpful and non constructive". Please explain. 81.102.15.200

Since I received no explanation after a week I added the edit back to 209radio. It has not been changed again suggesting that I was correct. 81.102.15.200

[edit]

Stop hand nuvola.svg This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing.


May 2007[edit]

Information.svg Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Autonomy Corporation. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. MER-C 13:51, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, please ignore this warning.

AfD nomination of The Scene That Celebrates Itself[edit]

I have nominated The Scene That Celebrates Itself, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Scene That Celebrates Itself. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 14:33, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

February 2008[edit]

Information.svg Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page The Day the Earth Stood Still (2008 film) worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. E Wing (talk) 12:08, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

March 2008[edit]

Information.svg Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Adinkra do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.  

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\bblogspot\.com' (link(s): http://adinkracosmos.blogspot.com/ http://kuntunkantan.blogspot.com/ http://epacoordinates.blogspot.com/ http://adinkraheneone.blogspot.com/ http://nyansapo.blogspot.com/ http://hyewohye.blogspot.com/) . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thorougly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creators copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 17:01, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

February 2009[edit]

Information.svg Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Giacomo Balla, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Griffinofwales (talk) 17:52, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information.svg Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Artist worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Kosh Naluboutes, Nalubotes Aeria gloris, Aeria gloris 17:56, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

April 2009[edit]

Information.png Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Puppetry of the Penis has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. TravisAF (talk) 12:10, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

July 2009[edit]

Information.png Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Giovanni Di Stefano has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. SchnitzelMannGreek. 14:53, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

February 2010[edit]

Information.png Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Courtney Pitt has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Manadude2 : Talk 16:47, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Information.svg Please do not delete or flag potential "spoilers" in Wikipedia articles, as you did in the article The Mousetrap. It is generally expected that the subjects of Wikipedia articles will be covered in detail, and giving a section a title such as "Plot" or "Ending" is considered sufficient warning to the reader that the text will contain revelations about the narrative. Deleting such information makes the article less useful for a reader who is specifically trying to find out more about the subject. For more information, see Wikipedia's guidelines on spoilers. Thank you.--McGeddon (talk) 12:28, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Information.svg Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to The Mousetrap, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 13:57, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Spoilers[edit]

Information.svg Please do not delete or flag potential "spoilers" in Wikipedia articles, as you did in the article Four Lions. It is generally expected that the subjects of Wikipedia articles will be covered in detail, and giving a section a title such as "Plot" or "Ending" is considered sufficient warning to the reader that the text will contain revelations about the narrative. Deleting such information makes the article less useful for a reader who is specifically trying to find out more about the subject. For more information, see Wikipedia's guidelines on spoilers. Thank you.--McGeddon (talk) 14:51, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Unhelpful edits[edit]

Information.png I have just reverted your edit to Major. I was going to drop you a friendly line here explaining how you can contribute usefully to Wikipedia, but I now see that you have a history of unconstructive edits, and with all the recommendations posted above, should by now be well aware of what is and is not acceptable here. Once again, you may wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. --Technopat (talk) 14:43, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Your edit to Major not only leaves the article as little more than a "List of countries using the rank of major" and a bit of colour, but also leaves out useful information. Please do not revert again. You are welcome to add as much additional information as you wish, notable and suitably referenced, but the article in question doesn't need slimming down. Thank you.--Technopat (talk) 14:53, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

October 2010[edit]

Information.png Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Thomas Arundel (disambiguation) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Orphan Wiki 10:13, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Information.svg Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Thomas Campbell. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 11:28, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

October 2010[edit]

Information.svg

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to George Osborne, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: George Osborne was changed by 81.102.15.200 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2010-10-21T12:27:27+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 12:27, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Information.svg Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at George Osborne. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Vrenator (talk) 12:47, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

February 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but in this recent edit you removed a speedy deletion tag from VigLink, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Qwyrxian (talk) 15:51, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Natural logarithm. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 14:55, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

March 2011[edit]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Exponential function. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 13:16, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Exponential function, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Favonian (talk) 10:45, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

April 2011[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for repeated addition of inappropriate external link in spite of warnings. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 16:49, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

June 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Exponential function do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Dmcq (talk) 17:11, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Linton Village College, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Dmcq (talk) 17:16, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Eike Onnen. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. A520 | Talk me away!/sign it! 14:13, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Richard Marx discography, you may be blocked from editing. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. A520 | Talk me away!/sign it! 14:14, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:81.102.15.200, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. A520 | Talk me away!/sign it! 14:15, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Cirt (talk) 14:18, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

AFC-Logo Decline.svg
You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Will V Stoyanov. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! sonia♫ 10:09, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

September 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding or significantly changing content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Jujuy Exodus, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Alan the Roving Ambassador (User:N5iln) (talk) 17:10, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

AFC-Logo Decline.svg
You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Will V Stoyanov. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Avicennasis @ 06:31, 9 Elul 5771 / 06:31, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Dan Warton for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dan Warton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Warton until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —cyberpower (Talk to Me)(Contributions) 20:54, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

January 2012[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jason Bateman. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 15:15, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

February 2012[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Linton Village College. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dmcq (talk) 12:57, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

March 2012[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Linton Village College. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Yunshui  13:52, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

April 2012[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Sharon Shannon do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia.  
Your edit here to Sharon Shannon was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://fergusfeeheny@blogspot.com) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 16:23, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Proposed deletion of Baggy[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Baggy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced for 7 years. Tagged for 2 years.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cresix (talk) 17:03, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Will V Stoyanov[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Will V Stoyanov, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. j⚛e deckertalk 15:21, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission Submissions/Baas Plantaion & Hunt Lodge[edit]

Hello 81.102.15.200. It has now been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Submissions/Baas Plantaion & Hunt Lodge.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Submissions/Baas Plantaion & Hunt Lodge}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hasteur (talk) 17:08, 18 July 2013 (UTC)