User talk:83.254.151.33

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, such as the one you made to Eruption of Mount Vesuvius in 79. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but you may want to consider creating an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (83.254.151.33) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! —hike395 (talk) 06:16, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Personal attacks[edit]

Hello 83.254.151.3. Regarding this comment, which you left on the talk page of an IP address that has been vandalizing the Thomas Szasz article, please see WP:NPA. You will be blocked if you keep making such comments. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 05:32, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Information icon This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 05:39, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Retold my take on the issue here 83.254.151.33 (talk) 22:40, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
You apparently don't understand the purpose of ANI. It's not for routine content disputes, as the weary editors who monitor that page are having to constantly explain to people. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 23:02, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
You'd be well advised to read the post I made, mister; it reaches into issues of principle. Hmm, and perhaps even to read some real philosophy, too.
Sorry, ANI isn't for routine content disputes. Be prepared for some condescension (and not only from me) if you insist on discussing things there. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 23:15, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
Well, I don't know about condescension, but FKC has a valid point. Take it up on the talk page, as I have. I have no problem with your late ANI comment, but let that be the end of that. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 06:05, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for doing the sensible and informed thing. As far as I can see FKC had never been active as an editor on that article or anything related, and the talk page of the article had been lying in deep sleep for a long time (as I've been pointing out from the start) so my bringing the matter there and waiting for FKC to jump in would not have been likely to produce any useful discussion. The source for this, as you put it, "extraordinary" claim was esentially a Chinese whisper with very little source value, so I was plainly removing an unsourced and very dubious statement on sight. 83.254.151.33 (talk) 06:15, 18 November 2013 (UTC)