User talk:A.amitkumar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


This user tries to leave Wikipedia, but finds that they can't do so…

A page you started (2006 Mangalore riots) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating 2006 Mangalore riots, A.amitkumar!

Wikipedia editor Narvekar ameya just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Topic is reviewed

To reply, leave a comment on Narvekar ameya's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Dash ‎[edit]

Hello. I didn't include a source about the French usage of dash because it is a wide-spread common knowledge about the French language: any source would be only anectoctical. I have re-entered the section because I thought its removal was the result of a bug. If you still think you know better than me, then remove it again, and I won't keep insisting. (in the version you "deleted", i however mentioned novellist George Simenon.)

Nomination of Software in retail for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Software in retail is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Software in retail until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Social and psychological value of money[edit]

Now that I'm logged in, I've removed protection from this page. WP:PP#User talk pages permits user talk protection for short durations only, not three months. Moreover, it's mandatory that you provide a link to an alternate talk page where anyone may contact you, and there's no link to any such page here or elsewhere.

Now regarding the issue at hand, please familiarise yourself with the concept of fiat money; the article in question most definitely speaks of fiat money, and the severe tone problems need the improvement that I made. Would you have reverted me had I been logged in? Just remember that WP:TONE addresses article tone, and by restoring one of numerous badly written passages, you've damaged this article.

Finally, kindly read WP:BITE carefully, as nothing scares potentially valuable contributors away faster than hostility. Contrary to your statement, you used the {{uw-vand1}} template: if an edit isn't vandalism, do not use this template. Continued abuse of Huggle, treating good-faith edits as vandalism and denying it, will result in the removal of the tool from your account. Nyttend (talk) 16:21, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Your behavior suggests you are often used to intimidating people in your conversations which I don't tolerate and makes me behave like a diva. If you cannot have a conversation in the article talk page about your differences and behave as if you own the article and want to push your edits, then no one can help you. Even though I leave my responses open ended to enable further discussion you are here using your clout to threaten me with revocation of access. To answer if I would have reverted you if you were logged in - I don't make that distinction, I revert what I feel in my personal opinion is wrong for the project irrespective of the editor history (which i never see before reverting). If you are going to have a conversation on the topic without showing your super powers here you are welcome else you can get off my talk page and do what ever you wish to do as i don't pursue reverts of my edits much and you could use that to your benefit..  A m i t  웃   16:44, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Original Barnstar Hires.png The Original Barnstar
I like your edit on the Kayastha page. Lets form a solidarity group against those who malign the article and its subject matter. I propose the folloing name for the group.

United intellectuals' front of Kayastha ethinicty against racist or castist abuse (UIFKEARCA) Khufiya Vibhaag (talk) 19:33, 16 July 2014 (UTC)