User talk:A.amitkumar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

A page you started (2006 Mangalore riots) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating 2006 Mangalore riots, A.amitkumar!

Wikipedia editor Narvekar ameya just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Topic is reviewed

To reply, leave a comment on Narvekar ameya's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Dash ‎[edit]

Hello. I didn't include a source about the French usage of dash because it is a wide-spread common knowledge about the French language: any source would be only ERROR sorry . I have re-entered the section because I thought its removal was the result of a bug. If you still think you know better than me, then remove it again, and I won't keep insisting. (in the version you "deleted", i however mentioned novellist George Simenon.)

Nomination of Software in retail for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Software in retail is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Software in retail until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.


Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — (talk) 18:09, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Facepalm  A m i t  웃   19:31, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Test edit[edit]

It wasn't a test edit - I said in the summary why I made the deletion. We can talk about it on the talk page. (talk) 16:39, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

John Glanville[edit]

Hi, Thanks for your response regarding the incorrect link to a William Glanville. I not that you have removed my Note but not updated or removed the link. This is misleading for research. Please could you provide correct link or remove details. What is your relationship to John Glanville? Pimarshall58 (talk) 17:58, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Damon Smith[edit]


I am currently employee with the artist Smooth da Hustler also known as Damon Smith. The information provided on your page is wrong. I am trying to update the profile directly from Mr. Smith himself, however, I keep getting warnings.

Please allow us to edit this page with the correct information — Preceding unsigned comment added by MsDanyelJones (talkcontribs) 17:41, 20 January 2015 (UTC)


SORRY BRO I'M JUST TRYING TO ADD SOME TINK. CAN YOU STOP PLEAS BANNINK ME. THENKX. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 18:19, 7 January 2015 (UTC)


Stop Reverting My Edits[edit]

You keep reverting my edits and as you likely do not attend my school i do not expect you to know who "Ace Dollasz" is. But i find your actions rude and i would like you to stop.

Unless you can justify the persons notability, I would suggest you wait for an admins action for the SPD  A m i t  웃   23:00, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
I also have posted a warning to stop using the wikipedia for self promotion(as looking at your contribution history that is the only thing you have done in all your edits). If you don't have anything productive to provide to Wikipedia i guess you dont have a place here.  A m i t  웃   23:40, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Are you an English linguist of any kind?[edit]

To make my next edition I will be ignoring your reversion, because it looks like you used a machine to do it, and that does not inspire my confidence in whether you know what you are talking about, or even that you do not habitually discard contributions from numbers, which is ignorant. (talk) 17:40, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

I am not an English linguist, but have seen enough wikipedia pages, and I don't expect that you provide an example without putting it in context. If your edition makes an article worse, then don't expect me to stand still and watch you show your English prowess, as I would be reverting it without fail. A m i t  웃   17:46, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
I wrote no examples. I wrote a comparison. "English" is a proper noun, so it is capitalized. Most of what I am getting out of your text is a willingness to edit war, even if I am correct. My English prowess gives you no reason to revert. "Edit" is a verb. "Edition" is a noun. You should follow "if" with "then". "i" should be capitalized. If you belonged here, then your grammar and usage would be correct. (talk) 02:20, 25 January 2015 (UTC)