User talk:Abcassionchan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

See also: achieve1

Stop x nuvola with clock.svg
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

24th October 2010[edit]

File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Abcassionchan (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblock)


Request reason:

Hello, I'm seriously ready about editing and clearly understood the Wikipedia:Disruptive editing. Also, I would like to cut short the block period. Thank-you. クリッシーサングスタークリッシーサングスター ♥ 03:23, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Beeblebrox (talk) 04:00, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first and then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page for as long as you are blocked.


File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Abcassionchan (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblock)


Request reason:

The block is no longer necessary because I had understand what have been blocked for. Neither do I want to cause damage nor disruption. I would make a useful contribution instead. クリッシーサングスタークリッシーサングスター ♥ 08:05, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I'm unconvinced you understand anything about why you were blocked; we already know you can copy and paste. --jpgordon::==( o ) 19:09, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first and then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page for as long as you are blocked.

Note that this user has deleted the explanation for the block, and an earlier declined unblock request. Bovlb (talk) 16:12, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
I've restored the declined request. Please do not reumove declined unblock requests while still blocked. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:50, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Abcassionchan (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblock)


Request reason:

I didn't wanted to abuse the privileges purposely and I hope to be given one more chance. I have truly admit my mistake of the block and others, I really meant it.

Decline reason:

So you somehow accidentally created yet another account, User:PermenentDecember? I don't think so; I've blocked that one also. --jpgordon::==( o ) 15:47, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first and then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page for as long as you are blocked.

File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Abcassionchan (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblock)


Request reason:

I had been away for weeks, thinking back all the past. Once again, I would like to sincerely apologize for creating another account but I didn't make much of it and also, for abusing the privilleges, I didn't meant to do it before creating that account. Thank-you. Criss 12:52, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This still does not address the reason for your block.  Sandstein  18:08, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first and then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page for as long as you are blocked.

reblocked without talk page[edit]

In light of your abuse of multiple accounts and your failure to appeal in a manner that indicates understanding of why you were blocked I have revoked your ability to appeal the block in this manner. Your best bet at this point is to consider the standard offer for blocked users. Any further appeals will need to be made by emailing the appeals subcommittee. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:08, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Abcassionchan/Sienna Wong[edit]

User:Abcassionchan/Sienna Wong, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Abcassionchan/Sienna Wong and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Abcassionchan/Sienna Wong during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 23:01, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Abcassionchan/Mandy Wong (entertainer)[edit]

User:Abcassionchan/Mandy Wong (entertainer), a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Abcassionchan/Mandy Wong (entertainer) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Abcassionchan/Mandy Wong (entertainer) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 23:10, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

WikiWomen's Collaborative: Come join us (and check out our new website)![edit]

WikiWomen - We need you!
WWC logo purple and blue.png
Hi Abcassionchan! The WikiWomen's Collaborative is a group of women from around the world who edit Wikipedia, contribute to its sister projects, and support the mission of free knowledge. We recently updated our website, created new volunteer positions, and more!

Get involved by:

  • Visiting our website for resources, events, and more
  • Meet other women and share your story in our profile space
  • Participate at and "like" our Facebook group
  • Join the conversation on our Twitter feed
  • Reading and writing for our blog channel
  • Volunteer to write for our blog, recruit blog writers, translate content, and co-run our Facebook and receive perks for volunteering
  • Already participating? Take our survey and share your experience!

Thanks for editing Wikipedia, and we look forward to you being a part of the Collaborative! -- EdwardsBot (talk) 01:12, 10 January 2013 (UTC)