User talk:AbelM7

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


August 2013[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to List of wars involving the United States has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

AbelM7, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi AbelM7! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! TheOriginalSoni (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:15, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, AbelM7. You have new messages at Iryna Harpy's talk page.
Message added 03:40, 18 January 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Iryna Harpy (talk) --Iryna Harpy (talk) 09:38, 18 January 2014 (UTC) --Iryna Harpy (talk) 04:23, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.[edit]

Peacedove.svg

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "Talk:Argentine American#Argentino_americano". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot operator / talk 20:23, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure![edit]

TWA guide left bottom.png
Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 18:51, Saturday April 19, 2014 (UTC)

Get Help
About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge


Continued edit warring[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Americans shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. - BilCat (talk) 15:21, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

You're kidding, right? I haven't even edit that article in three days until recently and I only got reverted for April 10 edit and the April 13 edit by you, three days apart. There is no edit warring and I didn't break the three-revert rule. The first edit, I didn't explained my edit and in the second one, I did so you guys will understand. AbelM7 (talk) 21:19, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
No, he's not kidding. "Edit-warring" does not autimatically mean "3RR violation". Two reverts three days apart can be an edit-war, and the fact you "explained" it does not make it not an edit-war. You are, in fact, currently engaged in multiple edit wars on multiple articles, and if you don't step back from reverting, regardless of how much time passes between reverts, and start discussing, you'll be blocked again, for longer. - The Bushranger One ping only 01:08, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
Yeah it does. There wasn't even an edit war on that article. I explained so there wouldn't be some sort of misconception so an editor would think before he decides to revert or not. And I already have started discussing on another article. And I will start discussing on this article as well. AbelM7 (talk) 03:55, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Hello friend[edit]

Sorry i made a typo over at the Canadian talk page - I do agree singular is fine. On a side note you may want to read over Talk:Germans/Archive 6 as there was a similar problem there. -- Moxy (talk) 05:46, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

That's okay. Mistakes happen. And thanks, will do! AbelM7 (talk) 06:03, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Border war issues[edit]

Abel7, Im getting well past feed up with you, if you insist on pushing original research and biased edits i'll have to take this issue to the administrators' noticeboard. You have nothing on favour of your point of view, even the American general John J. Pershing himself considered the campaign a complete failure, stop this pointless edit war. Same goes for you removing my notices on your talk page (if you say that you will attend the issues later, then don't edit any article related to them either). HMWD (talk) 23:30, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Why are you getting fed up? Is not original research nor biased. I can say the same thing towards you. That's Pershing's thoughts. USA won the war. If you want we could put a American/Carrancista military victory. Stop reverting so this pointless edit war will end. And I already told you I'll get back to you and here I am just like I said. And stop reverting the Mexican War of Independence and Mexican Drug War sections in the List of wars involving of Mexico article. The signing of Declaration of Independence of the Mexican Empire was an outcome and America and Colombia aren't fighting in the Mexican Drug War, they're just supporting Mexico. AbelM7 (talk) 22:34, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
I would suggest you seek an external third party's opinion through WP:DRR. See WP:Dispute_resolution. Note that edit warring is likely to get administrators hammering both of you. Regards, Tarl.Neustaedter (talk) 02:48, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

April 2014[edit]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Border War (1910–19). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Favonian (talk) 09:57, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

AbelM7 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblock)


Request reason:

I did edit war and for that I'm sorry. I know I can't undo an edit war but I can move forward and learn. I am trying to improve my Wikipedia skills and be a better Wikipedian overall. An example would be now I am using more of the talk pages [1], [2] to interact with other editors, solve disputes, come to a conclusion and better understanding. On the Canadians page, I was made aware of a similar problem that happened in another page and I saw from their point of view and got a better understanding. After that, we were able to resolve another dispute which was a minor one. On the page I was blocked for, Border War (1910–19), I have added sources to back up the results. I want to be unblock because I plan on to continue to contribute to Wikipedia, improving my skills, interact more with others when there is a dispute and assume good faith. AbelM7 (talk) 20:59, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Decline reason:

24 hours is a reasonable block considering that you were given several warnings. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:12, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first and then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page for as long as you are blocked.