User talk:Abhishikt

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Contents

                                                                                           ( हा साचा दाखवा   संपादन · बदल )

Indic script
This page contains Indic text. Without rendering support you may see irregular vowel positioning and a lack of conjuncts. More...


Users with Marathi language background are kindly requested to test all Visual Editor features along with Marathi language display settings and file the bugs wherever necessary.


Abhishikt,You are invited to Marathi Wikipedia!This template shall keep you informed about support and contribution required in various Marathi Wikipedia articles in times to come.



मराठी विकिपीडियात लेखांचा मराठीत शोध/अथवा लेखनासाठी ह्या व्हिडिओत दाखवल्या प्रमाणे मराठी आणि नंतर अक्षरांतरण पर्याय निवडा अथवा इनस्क्रिप्ट साठी 'मराठी लिपी' पर्याय, Click on the 'cc to change the subtitle languages to Marathi, English, Sanskrit, Kokani,Ahirani.

मराठी विकिपीडियाच्या सर्व आजी माजी वाचक,संपादक, आणि चहात्यांना अभिनंदन आणि

१ मे, २०१३मराठी विकिपीडियाच्या दहाव्या वर्धापनदिनानिमित्त स्मृतिचिन्ह

आपल्या मराठी विकिपीडियावरील सहभागाबद्दल, सहवासाबद्दल आणि उत्कृष्ट योगदानाबद्दल हे मराठी विकीचे अभिमान गौरव निशाण मराठी विकिपीडियाच्या सर्व आजी माजी वाचक,संपादक, आणि चहात्यांना अर्पण करण्यात येत आहे.आपल्या आवडीचे वाचन,लेखन संपादन असेच सदैव घडत राहो हि शुभेच्छा!!





  • आपल्याला माहित आहे का ? कि, इंग्लिश विकिपीडियातसुद्धा नॅव्हीगेशन म्हणजे सुचालन मराठी भाषेतून करणे अधिक सुलभ झाले आहे.डावीकडच्या मेन्यू कॉलममध्ये languagees च्या तीथे WMF-Agora-Settings 424242.svg या चक्र चिन्हा जवळ आपण नॅव्हीगेशन तसेच लिहिण्याची भाषा निवडू शकता ?
    आपण Special:Preferences पानावर Internationalisation मथळ्या पुढे सुद्धा mr-मराठी भाषा निवडून नॅव्हीगेशन म्हणजे सुचालन मराठी भाषेतून करू शकता.









Thanks to all Wikipedians who have been supporting Marathi Wikipedia through various means like interwiki linking etc.


With warm regards to you all,

~~~~

Marathi Wikipedia Welcome team


Notability of Wael Bahaa-El-Din[edit]

Information icon.svg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Wael Bahaa-El-Din, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Wael Bahaa-El-Din seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Wael Bahaa-El-Din, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 17:40, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nadig kruttika[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Nadig kruttika requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. AlexHOUSE (talk) 23:57, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 2010 Corus Chess Tournament[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

A tag has been placed on 2010 Corus Chess Tournament requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Shadowjams (talk) 00:20, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of PEARList[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article PEARList has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable neologism.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. かんぱい! Scapler (talk) 02:23, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ridit Nimdia[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Ridit Nimdia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Too soon for an article on this prodigy. The reference used only qualifies as trivial.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Blanchardb -MeMyEarsMyMouth- timed 01:20, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Ridit Nimdia[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

An article that you have been involved in editing, Ridit Nimdia, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ridit Nimdia. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Blanchardb -MeMyEarsMyMouth- timed 01:36, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Ridit Nimdia[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Ridit Nimdia, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=6557, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Ridit Nimdia saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Regards, SunCreator (talk) 13:55, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits[edit]

Information.svg Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button Insert-signature.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 02:42, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Response[edit]

I left a response to your inquiry. Short answer: it's an editing dispute, not vandalism, you should discuss it, and if that doesn't work, see the Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Shadowjams (talk) 21:28, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits[edit]

Information.svg Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button Insert-signature.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:23, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits[edit]

Information.svg Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button Insert-signature.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 03:19, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

SSHS[edit]

Katrina is a bad choice according to the Tropical Cyclone Wikiproject as is more known for making landfall as a Cat 3 in the GOM.Jason Rees (talk) 23:13, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits[edit]

Information.svg Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button Insert-signature.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:58, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

{{131.107.0.81|Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "JSL5871". The reason given for JSL5871's block is: "Personal attacks or harassment".|MLauba|2065969}}

Artículo bueno.svg

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

IPBE to be granted.

Request handled by: Daniel Case (talk)

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

IP block exempt[edit]

I have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking. This will allow you to edit through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.

Please read the page Wikipedia:IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions.

Note in particular that you are not permitted to use this newly-granted right to edit Wikipedia via anonymous proxies, or disruptively. If you do, or there is a serious concern of abuse, then the right may be removed by any administrator.

Appropriate usage and compliance with the policy may be checked periodically, due to the nature of block exemption, and block exemption will be removed when no longer needed (for example, when the block it is related to expires).

I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption. Daniel Case (talk) 03:04, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits[edit]

Information.svg Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button Insert-signature.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 01:07, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Darwin's influence in infobox[edit]

Thanks for raising the question at my talk page, I've replied there. . . dave souza, talk 09:40, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Fighting Gravity[edit]

Please note that Fighting Gravity does not link to the performers on America's Got Talent. Cresix (talk) 02:20, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits[edit]

Information.svg Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button Insert-signature.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:32, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Pope Benedict XVI's visit to the United Kingdom[edit]

Is it possible that your edits to the article, seeking to promote controversial aspects far beyond their due weight, is motivated by your being an atheist, and is therefore a kind of POV editing on your part? -Stevertigo (t | log | c) 06:29, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Abhishikt. You have new messages at Stevertigo's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Signing posts (please)[edit]

I am curious as to why you do not sign your posts on the talk pages? Is there any particular reason? I am interested. Also signing posts is part of the guidelines here at Wikipedia. Please read: WP:TPG#YES. Thank you.--- Steve Quinn (talk) 07:55, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Unfortunately I have not come across a way to sign posts automatically. ---- Steve Quinn (talk) 14:53, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits[edit]

Information.svg Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button Insert-signature.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:52, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Abhishikt. You have new messages at Talk:Bigg Boss (Season 4).
Message added 14:57, 3 January 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Nomination of Prometheus (film) for deletion[edit]

The article Prometheus (film) is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prometheus (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. magnius (talk) 20:47, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Prometheus (film) for deletion[edit]

The article Prometheus (film) is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prometheus (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. magnius (talk) 20:50, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Existence of God[edit]

Hi there Abhishikt. I am not preaching, I have merely pointed out factual information. In accordance with Wikipedia policy, my contribution:

Contains No Original Research

Has a Neutral Point of View

Is Completely Verifiable

So what is your problem ? Do you have a prejudice against Christianity ? The teaching of Jesus and the Apostles recorded in the Bible is directly relevant and important to the subject.

AHA ! Now I see it ! Your user page reveals you to be a self-confessed atheist ! I challenge you: Read the Gospels in prayer, asking God to convince you whether it is true or false, and whether it is His word. Put Jesus teaching into practice. Then come back and tell me whether or not God exists. Give up your prejudice and check out the facts for a change ! Darkman101 (talk) 17:39, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Atheism 3.0 AfD[edit]

Hey Abhishikt. Just an FYI regarding your AfD of Atheism 3.0, it's generally customary to cast a vote in your own AfD noms (if you have an opinion on it, that is), since an editor may sometimes bring an article to AfD after discussion elsewhere when they don't, themselves, agree with the nom, or they may be undecided on the issue and only looking for discussion. As such, your nomination may or may not be counted as a delete vote, so you may wish to be explicit about your opinion. Also, while I'm here, would you mind linking your user page and/or talk page in your sig? You don't currently, which forces users to type the url in manually to find them. Thanks!   — Jess· Δ 19:38, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know, but I have already voted for deletion on 16th. I have improved my signature now as per your suggestion :) Abhishikt (talk) 20:28, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
You're right, I missed that! Thanks for the signature change :) See you around!   — Jess· Δ 01:35, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
Jess it is not supposed to be "votes".Devilishlyhandsome (talk) 01:57, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
Yes you too Abishka - this demonstrates that the way you went about the afd was flawed because you don't understand that you were supposed to have an indepth discussion of the ideas not a simple straw vote. The afd is itself voidable.But we are at a new poin t How bout this - would you please paste me a copy of the old article so I can see what the problems were? That would be constructive. Devilishlyhandsome (talk) 02:00, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
You are right Devilishlyhandsome, that AfD is not "votes" and Jess probably conveyed it incorrectly, I guess he meant to convey that I should also state my reasons for deletion of that article. For previous version of the article, I saw though my changes history, but couldn't find it, you can probably contact an admin. BTW my name is Abhishikt. Abhishikt (talk) 02:08, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
Abhishikt, it seems that I am being given to understand for your then-current and apparently persisting resistance to WP coverage of this emerging trend in the intellectual history of popular atheist philosophy is that I should "contact an administrator" because you don't remember why. Gee whiz man. That resonates with Rick Warren's assertion that we should trust "God's Word" even if it makes no sense. Sorry, I can't participate in the fiction that this is a satisfactory explanation for the inexplicable collapse of WP:CENSOR.Devilishlyhandsome (talk) 02:25, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
I thought I was being clear enough, and seem to have gotten my intention across to the editor I was addressing, but in any case... yes, obviously the AfD was not a straw poll. However, making one's support clear in an AfD discussion is instrumental to determining consensus. I believe this is all covered in WP:CON. Either way, this really isn't the right way to "fight an improper AfD", even if this was one. WP:ANI would be the place to go if you felt an admin had acted improperly.   — Jess· Δ 02:36, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
I wasn't necessarily asserting that he "acted improperly" by closing the afd, I assert that the afd of that old article, which had only two citations, stated four times, is irrelevant to the forced userfication of a new article which had many more citations, which IMHO was not consistent with policy. And I take exception to this mantra that somebody or other keeps repeating that supposedly the article is not sourced when in fact there are multiple verifiable reliable sources including published authors,a Harvard chaplain, a Ph D or two. And what is really just appalling is that anyone would think for a moment that failed afd constitutes a basis for excluded content...sorry but this all smacks of suppression of intellectual freedom. I wish you guys would simply let the new article stand on its merits. Sorry I can understand that you just went through an afd and although Anapum is a very competent researcher he did neglect to fully source the article and it doesn't seem that he conducted as vigorous a defense as was required. I have not given up hope that you will agree to re-open the matter - I would not object to a replacement into mainspace with a de novo afd. It is a new and different article with more sources and deserves its own fair hearing.Devilishlyhandsome (talk) 02:34, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
Devilishlyhandsome, we agree with you on the fact that AfD is not voting and we used the term incorrect in conveying the real intend. Shall we please call this a WP:DEADHORSE. Abhishikt (talk) 03:30, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Re:Existence of God[edit]

Hello Abhishikt, thank you for your comment on my talk page. I looked at the section on the talk page you referred me to and it looks like their was a support for the moving of the argument to a different section, where it exists now. Regardless, I've added a reliable source to the statement to ensure its continued existence in the article. I hope this helps. With regards, AnupamTalk 19:02, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Please respect the EDIT NOTICE: No major shift w/o consensus[edit]

COPIED TO TALK PAGE of article

I reverted a substantial edit made without consensus. Just because four people in a contested process were able to for the time being prevent a poorly-documented (2 refs) article about a topic (Aeth 3.0) from its own freestanding article does not give you the right to unilaterally obliterate all mention of any author in that tradition, particularly under this kind of edit warning. Please do not do this again, thank you very much. Cheers.Devilishlyhandsome (talk) 00:14, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

I have provided reasons for my change in the talk page of the article. Abhishikt (talk) 00:57, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
Yes and quite diligently, eloquently and gracefully. Thank you.Devilishlyhandsome (talk) 02:40, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Invite to WikiConference India 2011[edit]

WCI banner.png

Hi Abhishikt,

The First WikiConference India is being organized in Mumbai and will take place on 18-20 November 2011.
You can see our Official website, the Facebook event and our Scholarship form.

But the activities start now with the 100 day long WikiOutreach.

As you are part of WikiProject India community we invite you to be there for conference and share your experience. Thank you for your contributions.

We look forward to see you at Mumbai on 18-20 November 2011

August 2011[edit]

You appear to be engaged in an edit war at Militant atheism. Continued reverting of other editor's may result in your editing privileges being blocked. – Lionel (talk) 12:39, 21 August 2011 (UTC)


Your plea to SilkTork for assistance at Militant Atheism is in violation of WP:CANVASS.– Lionel (talk) 23:25, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

RfC on Astrology[edit]

Because you have participated in a related RfC on this article, or have recently contributed to it, you are hereby informed that your input would be highly appreciated on the new RfC here: [[1]]. Thank you! Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 16:52, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Christopher Hitchens[edit]

We've already done the adding and removing of the recently died template to the article. Please have a look at the talk page. --GraemeL (talk) 22:21, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

April 2012[edit]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Atheism, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. AnupamTalk 05:17, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Did you bother to discuss the issue in the appropriate section of the talk page or are you going to continue to edit war? WP:NPOV states "Editing from a neutral point of view (NPOV) means representing fairly, proportionately, and as far as possible without bias, all significant views that have been published by reliable sources." Thanks, AnupamTalk 05:22, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
Edit conflict- This is absurd. All I removed part of your additions giving reason that those are not verifiable and simply asked you to gain consensus and you are engaging in edit war without giving any reason or attempting to talk. and you post this warning on my talk page for doing only one revert??. Can you explain yourself? Abhishikt (talk) 05:26, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
First you have to prove the notability and reliablility of the sources. Did you try to prove that or tried to gain consensus, as I had mentioned in my comments? Abhishikt (talk) 05:28, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
If you noticed my first edit summary, when the content was added, it stated "balanced findings with additional study + references per talk", where I discussed the addition of the study. If you object to the addition of the study, you should comment there rather than blindly reverting me. Also, contrary to what you stated above, you did not revert once, but twice. If you revert once more, you will have reached 3RR. In addition, to answer your question, the reference is reliable as it is taken from an academic journal. It is furthermore notable as the study was reported in CNN, among other forms of mass media. You would have obtained this information if you looked at the thread on the talk page I opened up. Rab Raakha, AnupamTalk 05:33, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
Anupam, you actually reverted five times. Please stop templating editors with these unfounded warnings, misusing sources by twisting them to fit your POV, and reverting "as vandalism" when there is none. —ArtifexMayhem (talk) 18:43, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
Thanks ArtifexMayhem for your involvement. I see that Anupam himself, got reported on wp:ani for edit warring and wp:3RR. I have put in my comments there. Abhishikt (talk) 00:27, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

RfC on Atheism[edit]

Hello, I noticed that you added "Above proposed sentence is to replace an existing sentence shown in below" to the RfC. The RfC proposal does not mean that the proposed sentence should replace an existing one. It only concerns itself with adding the proposed sentence. Both sentences can appear in the article; the two are not mutually exclusive. Thanks, AnupamTalk 04:18, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

From the edit history of Atheism article, I see that your proposed sentence was added in-place of the existing sentence I mentioned. And such replacement happened multiple times by multiple editors in the edit war there. Also I didn't see any comment from anyone that they are ok with both sentences. May be only you are Ok with both sentences and you can mention that as a part of your comment. Abhishikt (talk) 04:31, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
If you look at the edit history, the only reason I reverted the addition of that sentence is to restore the content that I added. I have no problem with the sentence being in the article. I started the RfC and do not see a problem with having both sentences in the article. I would request that you please leave that block of text out of the RfC stem I started. If you'd like to propose another question, you're more than welcome to start another RfC. Thanks, AnupamTalk 04:34, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Okay. Let me remove that part. Also I noted that in RfC stem you wrote "reincluded in the article", but the fact is that the sentence was not part of the article. The dispute began when it was added by you. Can you change it to something like "Added in the article" to make it accurate. Abhishikt (talk) 04:42, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Dear User:Abhishikt, I hatted your proposal as an alternative in the RfC stem - that way it still appears on top. I also removed the prefix "re" from the word "included" as you requested. I hope this helps. With regards, AnupamTalk 04:51, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
I saw you striked the alternative proposal. Thanks for that. Take care, AnupamTalk 04:53, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Good to see that you changed 'reincluded' to 'included'. Abhishikt (talk) 05:04, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Just a note[edit]

Just noticed the Marathi banner above... I did some work with Tata Consultancy Services a few years back and spent around ten weeks at their offices in Pune. It is truly awesome part of the planet - great people, great food (being from Texas I like spicy), great scenery and great works - with Ellora Caves and Ajanta Caves being particularly impressive. —ArtifexMayhem (talk) 05:28, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

chess template reply[edit]

I think you've made good improvements to the chess template, and I see that you are putting it in a lot of articles were it is needed. Good work! Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 05:48, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Thermal equilibrium[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Thermal equilibrium. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. RFC bot (talk) 08:15, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Hello[edit]

Hello, I've informed Administrator User:DGG about the revert. You can discuss the situation there. With regards, AnupamTalk 03:26, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Arbcom case[edit]

I have filed an arbcom case related to the mailing list that you are alledged to be coordinating with. You can review the case at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Anupam_.26_Bobrayner and provide a statement. Hipocrite (talk) 17:46, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for your kind words. bobrayner (talk) 06:36, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Neutral Point of View[edit]

Abhishikt, I note that you undid my edits on God of the Gaps, with a reference to Neutral Point of View. Please carefully review NPOV in the Wikipedia Policies and Guidelines and work with more care in the future. You will note that NPOV does not prevent an article accurately reporting on a topic which represents someone's point of view, nor does it proscribe a description of that point of view. The GOTG article provides plenty of references explaining that "God of the Gaps" is an inherently critical term for theological arguments that are deemed to be faulty. That discussion is expanded in the Talk page. The term was invented by Christian theologians to critique fallacious theology, just as the term "begging the question" was invented by logicians to critique fallacious logic. The GOTG article must make that clear. Mrdavenport (talk) 01:10, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Foreskin[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Foreskin. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. RFC bot (talk) 09:15, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Auto-archiving on FTN[edit]

Just so you'll know this edit destroyed auto-archiving on the fringe theories noticeboard. Try to be more careful about things like that. --Steven J. Anderson (talk) 19:55, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Dahn yoga[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Dahn yoga. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. RFC bot (talk) 10:15, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Plasma cosmology[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Plasma cosmology. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. RFC bot (talk) 11:15, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Nichiren Buddhism[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Nichiren Buddhism. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. RFC bot (talk) 11:15, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nokia Lumia 610[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Nokia Lumia 610 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

An individual handset is Not Notable (WP:N). All three or four (610/710/800/900) handsets could be merged under one article eg the 800. The note on a move from symbian to Win could easily be covered as a sentence there or in the general Nokia article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jabberwoch (talk) 20:07, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Tom Van Flandern[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Tom Van Flandern. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. RFC bot (talk) 12:15, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

DYK nomination of TypeScript[edit]

Symbol question.svg Hello! Your submission of TypeScript at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! David Eppstein (talk) 01:35, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

It has been a week, and the primary issues have not yet been addressed. Are you planning to do anything about them? BlueMoonset (talk) 04:01, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Bigg Boss 6[edit]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bigg Boss 6 regarding an issue with which your opinion may be of value. Thanks -- I'm Titanium  chat 15:02, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

On Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bigg Boss 6 you commented on the quality of the article's content. Therefore perhaps you would like to contribute to a discussion at Talk:Bigg Boss 6#Summaries concerning the quality and quantity of plot-related content. —Psychonaut (talk) 11:51, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:John Cassian[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:John Cassian. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. RFC bot (talk) 12:15, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Trojan Horse (novel)[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Trojan Horse (novel) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTDIR, plus lack of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Codename Lisa (talk) 09:25, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Windows RT Edit War (sigh)[edit]

Please contribute to the poll on Talk:Windows RT. (You are being asked because you commented on MS Surface.) Tuntable (talk) 23:26, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Prometheus (film)[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Prometheus (film). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. RFC bot (talk) 13:15, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Hurricane Sandy[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Hurricane Sandy. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. RFC bot (talk) 13:17, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Cannabis (drug)[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Cannabis (drug). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. RFC bot (talk) 14:15, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. RFC bot (talk) 14:15, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bicycle helmets in Australia[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Bicycle helmets in Australia. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. RFC bot (talk) 15:15, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Flare (pyrotechnic)[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Flare (pyrotechnic). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. RFC bot (talk) 16:16, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Creation Museum[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Creation Museum. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. RFC bot (talk) 17:15, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Race and intelligence[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Race and intelligence. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. RFC bot (talk) 17:15, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Yuilop[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Yuilop. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. RFC bot (talk) 17:15, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Penis[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Penis. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. Legobot (talk) 01:13, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:VPIN[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:VPIN. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. Legobot (talk) 00:08, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Electronic cigarette[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Electronic cigarette. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:06, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Please notice ip 111.243.0.198 , 114.39.7.129[edit]

Hi , Please notice, ip user 111.243.0.198 and ip 114.39.7.129 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/111.243.0.198 , https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/114.39.7.129, Vandalism a lot of articles , please stop these ip user , thank youMBINISIDLERS (talk) 08:50, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Criticism of Jainism for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Criticism of Jainism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of Jainism until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Rahul (talk) 06:24, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Criticism of Jainism[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Criticism of Jainism, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from , and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Criticism of Jainism saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Itsmejudith (talkcontribs) 22:43, December 16, 2013‎

Please comment on Talk:List of topics characterized as pseudoscience[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of topics characterized as pseudoscience. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:German acupuncture trials[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:German acupuncture trials. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:06, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Auditory hallucination[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Auditory hallucination. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Pathology[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Pathology. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 18:51, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Voting system[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Voting system. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Autism[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Autism. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Dorje Shugden controversy[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Dorje Shugden controversy. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Gliese 581[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Gliese 581. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Constant folding[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Constant folding. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Miroslav Klose[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Miroslav Klose. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Artificial intelligence[edit]

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Artificial intelligence. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Sigmund Freud[edit]

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Sigmund Freud. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:07, 21 November 2014 (UTC)