User talk:Χ/Archive 2014
(Redirected from User talk:Abjiklam/Archive 2014)
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
October 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Abderrahim Zouari may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- Investment Bank biography]</ref> He is the candidate for the [[Destourian Movement]] in the [[Tunisian presidential election, 2014|2014 presidential election.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:29, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi Abjiklam. Did you mean to revert my changes to the infobox in this edit? From what I have seen elsewhere, we're meant to just use File:Blank.png when there isn't an image available. Cheers, Number 57 09:35, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
- Hi. Yes I think I misunderstood your edit summary and I reverted you for the wrong reason. The reason for my edit comes from seeing Canadian federal election, 1980 and previous. I think the placeholders used on these articles are much nicer than simply using a blank image. Any reason it shouldn't be used? Abjiklɐm (tɐlk) 09:59, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
Tunisian party colors
Hi, Abjiklam. I saw your changes at Tunisian party color templates, and I have a few concerns about it. Firstly, I can accept your logic that purple was the unofficial color of Ben Ali's regime, so it may be fine at Template:Democratic Constitutional Rally/meta/color, but what about the Bourguiba regime? I'm not so sure that purple can be used for Neo Destour and the Socialist Destourian Party (for the 1956/57-1987/88 period)... Secondly, I'm not so sure that color templates for Neo Destour and the Socialist Destourian Party should be merged into Template:Democratic Constitutional Rally/meta/color. In my opinion, it would be better if we keep separate templates for them, especially if purple is to stay at the RCD template. Cheers! --Sundostund (tɐlk) 13:38, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- Hi Sundostund, thanks for the feedback. First of all let me explain my rationale for changing all the colours. When I first decided on the colours many months ago, I chose a significant colour found on the logos. Unfortunately, a huge (and increasing) number of parties use red as their primary colour. Therefore I decided to change all of them using only X11 names. This will insure that we get a minimum of difference between party colours. I gave priority to the current parties (those that won a seat in the ARP and those that filed a candidate for the presidency), and I decided that two parties that never existed at the same time could share the same colour (e.g. Nidaa Tounes and the Communist Party). However, if a party is a direct descendant of another, I tried to keep the same colour (e.g. the Republican Party is yellow because it used to be (mostly) the PDP, even though that colour is no longer used by the current party). Finally, two parties that gained power that are not related to each other should not share a colour even if one disappeared before the other was created (it would be confusing on article that lists presidents, PMs, etc.).
- These colours are not official in any way and serve only as a visual guide. This point brings me to the RCD and its predecessors. I don't consider the various names used by the pre-revolution regime to be changes in the party itself. That is why I suggest we keep the same colour for all parties from the Neo Destour to the RCD. For example, in the list of president, I think it would be extremely disingenuous to change the colours between Ben Ali and Bourguiba. Both were clearly part of the same regime and the visual guide should not imply otherwise. As to the choice of purple, it serves mainly to differentiate it from the current Nidaa Tounes which holds a significant amount of power today. Although purple is a bit anachronistic, we have to bear in mind that colours were never official in Tunisia, and I think the disadvantages of that choice are outweighed by the necessity to keep the Neo-Destour/PSD/RCD the same colour.
- Of course I'm open to criticism and suggestions, this is a work in progress after all! Abjiklɐm (tɐlk) 14:22, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- Abjiklam, I understand your rational regarding party colors, but honestly speaking, of all Tunisian parties, I'm only interested in the Neo-Destour/PSD/RCD. I'm not opposed to the idea that the Neo-Destour/PSD/RCD share the same colour, but I really don't like the idea to have purple as a common color for all three parties. It would be much better if we find some shade of red instead of purple... Party color should (at least to some degree) represent the ideological position of that party, and in this case I truly doubt that purple should be the color of choice. And, I still think it would be better to keep separate color templates for the Neo-Destour/PSD/RCD, instead of using the RCD template to mark parties which existed decades before the RCD was founded. As you said - This is a work in progress, and I only want to help, nothing more. --Sundostund (tɐlk) 14:43, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- It's too bad it's hard to convey emotions through text. I wholeheartedly and unequivocally accept your help and not a single sentence in my response was meant to be dismissive :)
- So you disagree with purple, what is your suggestion? Could you explain why RCD and Neo Destour should be presented differently? Abjiklɐm (tɐlk) 15:04, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- I'm more than pleased with your response, I don't consider anything in it to be dismissive... As I said above, we should use some shade of red instead of purple. There're countless shades of red (look at List of colors: A–F#Colors in alphabetical order A-F), and one of them will be right in this case. Again, I don't think we should use the RCD template to mark parties which existed decades before the RCD was founded. Its not so hard to use separate templates for them, after all we have separate articles for those three parties. --Sundostund (tɐlk) 15:10, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- Actually there are templates for each of the parties, and they are all used where they should be. It's just that, for the sake of simplicity, they are redirects of one another. Abjiklɐm (tɐlk) 15:22, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- I think templates shouldn't be redirected to the RCD template, but separated from one another (like articles about their respective parties)... If we (eventually) merge content about the Neo Destour and PSD into the RCD article, then templates can be merged too. As for the color, please choose some shade of red and replace purple. I truly believe that purple can't be used for the pre-1987 period. I'm sure we can find some mutually acceptable color from the link I posted above. --Sundostund (tɐlk) 17:15, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- I don't understand why redirects should be proscribed when it makes no difference for either readers or editors. I changed the colour to Crimson. Abjiklɐm (tɐlk) 17:36, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- Crimson looks absolutely perfect! I'm really pleased with your choice. Now it looks ideologically connected with the Neo Destour and PSD, instead of purple which, really, didn't represented anything... As for redirects, in my experience on Wikipedia, if we have a separate article about a party then we should also have a separate color template for that party. I strongly recommend you to consider merging the Neo Destour and PSD into the RCD article, in that case the template issue would become obsolete. As we now, those three parties are historically interconnected, with the RCD being their last incarnation. --Sundostund (tɐlk) 17:48, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- Glad you like the choice! I agree the articles should be merged. It's something I've considered doing in the near future. In the meantime I don't think we need to change anything to the templates. They effectively function as three different templates that simply synchronize their colours. Abjiklɐm (tɐlk) 17:52, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- I'm really glad to hear that you considered to merge the articles in the near future. By doing that, it would be perfectly logical to have one (RCD) color template. I agree that we don't need to change anything to the templates as they are now, as long as you're ready to merge the articles... Btw, as I can see, the Neo Destour and PSD articles have lists of their electoral results, and that info definitely should be kept and combined with similar info which already exist at the RCD article, once the merging is complete. Btw, I must log off now (have some stuff to do in "real world"), therefore sorry if I don't respond until tomorrow. --Sundostund (tɐlk) 18:02, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- Glad you like the choice! I agree the articles should be merged. It's something I've considered doing in the near future. In the meantime I don't think we need to change anything to the templates. They effectively function as three different templates that simply synchronize their colours. Abjiklɐm (tɐlk) 17:52, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- Crimson looks absolutely perfect! I'm really pleased with your choice. Now it looks ideologically connected with the Neo Destour and PSD, instead of purple which, really, didn't represented anything... As for redirects, in my experience on Wikipedia, if we have a separate article about a party then we should also have a separate color template for that party. I strongly recommend you to consider merging the Neo Destour and PSD into the RCD article, in that case the template issue would become obsolete. As we now, those three parties are historically interconnected, with the RCD being their last incarnation. --Sundostund (tɐlk) 17:48, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- I don't understand why redirects should be proscribed when it makes no difference for either readers or editors. I changed the colour to Crimson. Abjiklɐm (tɐlk) 17:36, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- I think templates shouldn't be redirected to the RCD template, but separated from one another (like articles about their respective parties)... If we (eventually) merge content about the Neo Destour and PSD into the RCD article, then templates can be merged too. As for the color, please choose some shade of red and replace purple. I truly believe that purple can't be used for the pre-1987 period. I'm sure we can find some mutually acceptable color from the link I posted above. --Sundostund (tɐlk) 17:15, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- Actually there are templates for each of the parties, and they are all used where they should be. It's just that, for the sake of simplicity, they are redirects of one another. Abjiklɐm (tɐlk) 15:22, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- I'm more than pleased with your response, I don't consider anything in it to be dismissive... As I said above, we should use some shade of red instead of purple. There're countless shades of red (look at List of colors: A–F#Colors in alphabetical order A-F), and one of them will be right in this case. Again, I don't think we should use the RCD template to mark parties which existed decades before the RCD was founded. Its not so hard to use separate templates for them, after all we have separate articles for those three parties. --Sundostund (tɐlk) 15:10, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- Abjiklam, I understand your rational regarding party colors, but honestly speaking, of all Tunisian parties, I'm only interested in the Neo-Destour/PSD/RCD. I'm not opposed to the idea that the Neo-Destour/PSD/RCD share the same colour, but I really don't like the idea to have purple as a common color for all three parties. It would be much better if we find some shade of red instead of purple... Party color should (at least to some degree) represent the ideological position of that party, and in this case I truly doubt that purple should be the color of choice. And, I still think it would be better to keep separate color templates for the Neo-Destour/PSD/RCD, instead of using the RCD template to mark parties which existed decades before the RCD was founded. As you said - This is a work in progress, and I only want to help, nothing more. --Sundostund (tɐlk) 14:43, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
Category:Tunisia legislative election result templates
Category:Tunisia legislative election result templates, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. PanchoS (talk) 23:17, 28 December 2014 (UTC)