User talk:Abyssal/Archive 15

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nomination of Trevor James Constable for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Trevor James Constable is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trevor James Constable until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. LuckyLouie (talk) 16:22, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Taxa with documented paleopathologies[edit]

Category:Taxa with documented paleopathologies, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 20:59, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 23 April[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Taxa with documented soft tissue fossils[edit]

Category:Taxa with documented soft tissue fossils, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 14:53, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Subfields and areas of study related to evolutionary biology has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. You are encouraged to join the discussion on the Categories for discussion page. Liz Read! Talk! 00:09, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Tilgate Formation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Tilgate Formation appears in index of 2nd edition dinosauria with reference to page 308, but there is no mention of Tilgate Formation on that page, just Tilgate Forest, so Tilgate Formation is merely a lapsus calami for Tilgate Forest

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Hi, Abyssal. I thought you might want to know about the above PROD, since you created the page. I investigated the claim, and I suspect that instead of a lapsus calami, what actually happened was a spellcheck error in the process of converting the book to an electronic version. Do you have a hard copy of The Dinosauria that you could check? - Gorthian (talk) 05:19, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Just a note to add that what made me suspect a spellcheck error is the phrase "discovered in the strata of Tilgate Forest" on page 737 in the Google Books version. The idea of a stratified forest struck me as most peculiar. - Gorthian (talk) 05:29, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Time Units[edit]

The ages in Dinosauria are very general, and a lot of more detailed start work has been done on major formations since the 2nd edition was published. In general though, things like Aptian-Albian are usually used to mean somewhere around the boundary or straddling the boundary, not ranging from early Aptian to late Albian. It can also mean the youngest sediments are Albian and oldest are Aptian, though you wouldn't be able to tell from this when in each stage they are, nor should just Aptian be taken to mean it spanned the entire stage. Listing stage alone is good to get general bearings but is next to useless for comparing formations. Dinoguy2 (talk) 16:23, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Locations of Mesozoic formations[edit]

You've been going great guns on creating Mesozoic-formation stubs (I came here from Khilok Formation), but I have a request. Please put in some information about where each formation is located: a region, a state, a country, anything! It will help de-orphanize some of the articles, and it would help greatly in categorizing. Thanks! - Gorthian (talk) 04:55, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also, if you could tag the talk page with the WP:GEOLOGY banner, that would help out, too. - Gorthian (talk) 04:57, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate articles?[edit]

Hi, me again. You recently created Luohangdong Formation; but I think it's a misspelling of Luohandong Formation, which you created back in 2009. If I'm right, maybe you could just ask for a speedy delete of the mistaken one. If they really are separate formations, maybe a hatnote or two to disambiguate them? Cheers! - Gorthian (talk) 05:10, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, now I found Qiqu Formation and Qigu Formation, and I have the same questions. I don't have the background, or the references, to tease these out. - Gorthian (talk) 05:46, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in West Virginia may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:03, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in Indiana may have broken the syntax by modifying 12 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:45, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in North Carolina may have broken the syntax by modifying 12 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:37, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in Virginia may have broken the syntax by modifying 34 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:02, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in Delaware may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • | [[Chesapeake Group/[[Calvert Formation]] || [[ Neogene ]] ||

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:32, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in South Carolina may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • | [[Socastee and [[Wando Formation]] || [[ United States]] ||

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:52, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in New York may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • | [[Millport Formation]] equivalent ]] || [[ Devonian ]] ||

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:17, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 24[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in Indiana, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Richmond and Waynesville (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:47, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Georgia[edit]

Did you know there is more than one place in the world called Georgia? Well, now you do. The next time you decide to create 30 or more articles containing identical text blocks, you might want to check first to make sure that the links in them are going to the correct article. Thanks! R'n'B (call me Russ) 21:56, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

brackets[edit]

Try not using broken brackets and fix them when bracketbot tells you about them. You currently have 32 broken brackets in your article. I really don't want to waste my time fixing your problems. Bgwhite (talk) 21:41, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 1[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in Alabama (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Jackson, Midway, Lower, Wilcox, Upper and Coal Bluff
List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in Georgia (U.S. state) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Clayton, Providence, Eutaw and Upper
List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in Connecticut (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Portland, Newark and Meriden
List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in Florida (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Belle Glade, Hawthorn and Arredondo
List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in New Jersey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Raritan, Towaco and Hornerstown
List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in Maryland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Greene and Gettysburg
List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in Pennsylvania (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Chemung and Mahantango
List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in Illinois (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Cedar Valley
List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in North Carolina (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Black Creek

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

pagename[edit]

Hi Abyssal! I see you have been creating lots of article stubs using {{pagename}}, which puts your articles in the maintenance Category:Pages which use a template in place of a magic word. Could you replace each instance of {{pagename}} with {{subst:PAGENAME}}, so that the wiki will automatically convert the template to the actual page name? Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 16:58, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Page is even worse. If there was a Rube Goldberg machine edit award, having {{#if:|{{PAGENAME:}}|{{PAGENAME}}}}[[Category:Pages which use a template in place of a magic word|PN00{{PAGENAME}}]] for the page's name almost takes the cake.
Here's the edit summary I did on multiple pages in case you didn't see them... Talk about a Rube Goldberg machine edit to just do the page's name. No flags per WP:MOSFLAG. Reference does not mention this formation. Give the exact page, not the home page. Bgwhite (talk) 04:49, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Bgwhite: In my tests, I found that using {{subst:pagename}} (lowercase), I got the mess, whereas {{subst:PAGENAME}} (uppercase) should be fine. Could you please confirm which you used? Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 22:43, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
GoingBatty, yes, uppercase is answer. Bgwhite (talk) 22:46, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 8[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in Mississippi
added links pointing to Jackson, Red Bluff, Yazoo and Eutaw
List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in South Dakota
added links pointing to Basal, Niobrara, Greenhorn and Lakota
List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in Louisiana
added links pointing to Jackson, Basal and Claiborne
List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in California
added links pointing to Lower and Upper
List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in Iowa
added links pointing to Cedar Valley and Lime Creek
List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in Kansas
added links pointing to Dry and Stull
List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in Missouri
added links pointing to Unnamed and Fort Scott
List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in Arkansas
added a link pointing to Winslow
List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in Idaho
added a link pointing to Upper
List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in Minnesota
added a link pointing to Maquoketa
List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in New Mexico
added a link pointing to Lower
List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in North Dakota
added a link pointing to Niobrara
List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in Oklahoma
added a link pointing to Deer Creek
List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in Texas
added a link pointing to Lower

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Abyssal. There is an existing article on Platteville Limestone. You may wish to add the content of one article to the other, and convert the one to a redirect. I think that "Platteville Formation" is the more common name, but could be mistaken. Regards, Kablammo (talk) 20:41, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

borked brackets.[edit]

Could you check List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in Pennsylvania. I think the script went haywire and there are alot of broken brackets. Bgwhite (talk) 22:52, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in El Salvador is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in El Salvador until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. NickGibson3900 (Talk - Cont.) 11:33, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

articles Comment[edit]

You have created a lot of articles with nothing in them. Are they going to be fixed or should they all be deleted? NickGibson3900 (Talk - Cont.) 11:35, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in New Brunswick
added a link pointing to Lower
List of plesiosaur-bearing stratigraphic units
added a link pointing to Portland Group

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Campeto Formation[edit]

Hello. A redirect you created, Campeto Formation, is listed at Special:DoubleRedirects because it is a redirect to itself. I'm sure this was not your intention, and normally I would try to resolve redirect loops myself. However, in this case I have been unable to identify the correct target for the redirect. Please would you take a look? Thanks. Wdchk (talk) 02:27, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I was about to Prod the article until I saw your name. You need some text.. big map with nothing else tell me nothing. But the big problem, screen readers (aka blind) have a hard problem "seeing" anything via the map. Might want to change it to a list. Bgwhite (talk) 05:56, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What kind of text do you think it needs? Surely a clickable map is better than a text list of links to articles, which can be found in the category of the same name anyway. Abyssal (talk) 10:30, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
To begin with, what in the world is a Fossiliferous stratigraphic unit? Without any text to tell what is going on, the map is no better that the template below. Bgwhite (talk) 17:35, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 23[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in England, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Portland Group. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:46, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar for You![edit]

The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
In recognition of your recent and continuing work on stratigraphic units. RomanSpa (talk) 06:57, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]