User talk:Adam9389

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Adam9389! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! --Nuujinn (talk) 11:52, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous


You may be interested[edit]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Austrian_School#Mises.2Finflation.2FKrugman http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Austrian_School#Edit_Warring_----_Byelf2007_Please_Revert_your_recent_edits http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Austrian_School#RfC_Krugman_critique_about_inflation Byelf2007 (talk) 14 December 2012

December 2012[edit]

Thank you for your suggestion. When you believe an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the edit this page link at the top.
The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). S. Rich (talk) 00:51, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Ann Dunham[edit]

Hi. I've removed the links you added to Obama's quote on Ann Dunham. You may want to review Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#Linking and WP:LINKSTYLE. We generally avoid changing quotes by adding links. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Viriditas (talk) 00:10, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

No worries. My mistake. --Adam9389 (talk) 19:21, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

You're invited: Spacefest Edit-a-thon Honoring Sally Ride - Tucson, AZ[edit]

Women in Astronomy and Space Sciences Edit-a-thon - Tucson, AZ - You are invited!
Ride on the Middeck - GPN-2000-001081.jpg
Sally Ride was the first American woman in space and a champion of girls and women everywhere. Ride would have turned 62 on May 26th had the world not lost her to pancreatic cancer last July. To honor her enduring legacy, southern Arizonans and all attendees of SpaceFest are invited to gather on her birthday to edit and create Wikipedia entries on notable women in astronomy and the space sciences. Register to attend or sign up to participate remotely - visit this page to do either.
Girona7 (talk) 06:07, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

WikiDefender Barnstar Hires.png The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
Just want to say you do some good, sensible editing on Libertarianism and I'm sure other articles and wanted you to know someone out there does appreciate it! CarolMooreDC - talkie talkie🗽 13:34, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Much appreciated. Happy to help! --Adam9389 (talk) 15:49, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Clare Daly[edit]

I reverted your edits which labeled Clare Daly an atheist per BLP guidelines. The source you attributed the claim to did not appear to verify the claim. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion. Thanks. ChakaKongtalk 14:20, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Understood. I actually wasn't the one who cited the source. The statement and source were already there, I just added the category to increase the article's connectivity and reflect what I thought was accuracy. But, nonetheless, my mistake. Adam9389 (talk) 09:37, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Yes, I realize the original claim was already there and added by someone else, but the source actually makes no mention of Daly identifying as an atheist. It's a good idea to verify such claims before adding a new category that may be viewed as contentious. ChakaKongtalk 17:44, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Constitutionality subsection of Federal Reserve Note article[edit]

Greetings, Adam9389 -- you are cordially invited to an edit-war I'm hosting.  :-)   Since you recently edited that subsection, I thought I'd drop you a note about some changes I'm planning. Here are my additions to the talk-page of the article: #1 Ron Paul, #2 McCulloch. See also #3 RBBrittain, the other wiki-editor I invited over. Thanks. p.s. If this request is annoying, please accept my apologies, or if you are too busy, no problem. 74.192.84.101 (talk) 02:36, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the invite, but I don't do edit wars. --Adam9389 (talk) 19:34, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
Well, I agree, me neither. Tongue was firmly in cheek, but sometimes tone is hard to convey via the internet. Anyways, the other person (who put some strict instructions in a hidden-html-comment telling me not to add cite-needed tags to his paragraph) has not responded to either my addition of cite-needed tags, or my invite, so my proposed 'edit-war' has turned out to be just myself.  :-) I'll go ahead and make my proposed changes in the main article, and see if anybody responds to those; you are welcome to do so, of course, if you feel like it. Thanks for your time. 74.192.84.101 (talk) 15:26, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Neutral notice[edit]

This is a neutral notice that an RfC has been opened at an article which you have edited within the past year. It is at Talk:Clint Eastwood#8 children by 6 women. --Tenebrae (talk) 14:24, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

December 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Alasdair MacIntyre may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • traditions and the different ways they can split apart, integrate, or defeat one another (e.g. [[Aristotelianism|Aristotelian, [[Augustine of Hippo|Augustinian]], [[Thomism|Thomist]], [[David Hume|

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:04, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Libertarianism increasingly viewed as a free market ideology[edit]

Adam9389, thank you for modifying the "Etymology" section to fix the citation problem with the claim that libertarianism is increasingly viewed as a free-market ideology. I have a couple of comments on the change made:

  1. I don't see why we need sourcing, let alone multiple sources, for the fact that free-market libertarianism has propagated beyond the USA's borders;
  2. the sources don't say anything like "libertarianism is increasingly viewed as a free-market ideology."

I've removed all four sources used to support this sentence for these two reasons. If you feel that we need citations for the claim that capitalist libertarianism has spread beyond the USA, feel free to add them back, but I hope you won't add back the two sources for the second claim; we need a new source, one which actually supports this claim. Thank you! -- MisterDub (talk | contribs) 20:42, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi MisterDub. The sentiment that capitalist libertarianism exists almost at all outside the U.S. has been a contentious issue in the past on the Libertarianism talk page -- I don't know why. Perhaps that's changed, but I just figured two sources were better than one. I mean, ultimately everything on Wikipedia needs citations anyway and it's not like the use of multiple sources is a rarity. I've re-read all four sources (one now being dead evidently) and you're absolutely right about the latter two. I'll search for something better. But, for reasons stated, I would like to re-insert the first two sources regarding the spread, if you'll agree to it. But I'll take no action until you respond/verify. --Adam9389 (talk) 05:06, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
Yeah, that's fine by me. Thank you! -- MisterDub (talk | contribs) 17:02, 18 January 2014 (UTC)