User talk:Akhilleus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Good to see you materialize. As you know I'm not really active at Wikipedia at present (so any need not to quibble or go through bureaucracy myself on such a point would be most welcome), but I hate to see defensible content go. I'm not saying you have to adopt those illustrations as your cause, but I do appreciate not being all on my own against these official-sounding reprimands (perhaps you saw the threat to block me?). Wareh (talk) 16:30, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Indeed, I noticed that most uncollegial "warning". It seems that Mr. Werieth is patrolling fair use images, and is ruffling feathers at other articles as well. --Akhilleus (talk) 17:37, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
Thanks, you're a real mensch. Wareh (talk) 02:30, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Christ myth theory again[edit]

Hi, thank you for your help on the CMT article and for keeping an eye on the page. I hope you will continue to do so!Smeat75 (talk) 15:39, 21 March 2014 (UTC)15:38, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Dispute resolution[edit]

A content dispute resolution process has been started at [1]. Please participate and contribute to a resolution. Wdford (talk) 16:17, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.[edit]


This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "Christ myth theory". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! --Guy Macon (talk) 05:20, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

New Testament Scholars are Unreliable and biased[edit]

Regarding Christ Myth Theory - this article has the Papal Seal of Approval - an article about the Christ Myth Theory that is obviously written by believers in the New Testament - the New Testament that is steeped in mythology and made-up history. The Christ Myth theory article is awful. "Oh yes, let's write a critical article about the historical Christ, and while we're at it, let's endorse the Word of God found in the Holy Bible and discredit the false disbelievers". Dickie birdie (talk) 22:46, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Request for comment[edit]

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)