User talk:Al Khazar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Did you know?[edit]

Did you know that if not for the Khazars (who converted to judaism), much of eastern Europe would have been overrun by the Arabs and become Islamic? [1] USchick (talk) 02:56, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

I'm well aware of that. In fact, I consider that more remarkable than the religion of the Khazars because it seems to be their only legacy. They didn't seem to leave a genetic or cultural legacy in the Caucasus. Khazar (talk) 05:24, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

2S25[edit]

Next time please read the sources mentioned at literature section or at least use {{Citations needed}} template before revert edits. If you don't, your edits will be classified as destructive. Best regards, Smell U Later (talk) 20:35, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

I did. There was no mention of this vehicle being produced during the 1980's. That's in direct violation of WP:OR. Khazar (talk) 20:38, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
No, You didn't. Smell U Later (talk) 20:45, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Don't make false accusations. This vehicle is based on the BMD-3 chassis which was made since 1990. Its SPRUT anti-tank gun was made in 1989. So I don't know where you're getting this date from. Khazar (talk) 20:49, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Just read the source, ok? Smell U Later (talk) 20:53, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Sorry for my behavior. Can you provide a link to that source please? Khazar (talk) 20:55, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
[2] Smell U Later (talk) 21:00, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Also, you can read about object 934 experimental light tank of the 1970's, on wich base was made BMD-3 and first Sprut prototypes. Smell U Later (talk) 21:04, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks man. It's hard for us English speakers to get all the information on these vehicles. If it isn't too much to ask, could you also add that information to the English version of that article? Khazar (talk) 21:06, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Ok, i'll try may be tomorrow or at the holydays. Smell U Later (talk) 21:11, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Full Apology[edit]

Listen, you were right I did act uncivil and would like to formally apologize about it. After seeing the way you were talking about Karaites and Sephardim/Mizrahim I was under the impression you were going to try to make all Jews out to be Rabbinic Ashkenazi Jews. I do hope though that you have learned something about Karaite Judaism. Any way I'm formally apologizing here. I do think you should consider however how your username might be problematic. I hope you can forgive me and if you want I can try to erase that part of the discussion. I hope in the future we can work together for the betterment of not only Wikipedia but Jewry as well. Anyway do look up Karaite Judaism and the difference between that and the Crimean Karaites. And please accept my apology.-Rainbowofpeace (talk) 00:55, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

I fully accept your apology. Karaite Judaism is very interesting and I'll be sure to read more about it. I admit that my username can cause some people to be wary of me when I edit articles related to Jewish people and Judaism. But that never occurred to me because I was more interested with Central Asian history at the time than the Khazar theory. I'm glad you took the time to note your mistake and apologize and I'd also like to thank you for being empathetic regarding my username. Khazar (talk) 02:46, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
So here's a kitty. We good?-Rainbowofpeace (talk) 06:34, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Yep, we're good. Everyone loves kittens! Khazar (talk) 21:32, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Russians[edit]

Before you blindly revert, have a look what was done. You obviously didn't, so... This is the proper way of adding multiple images in infoboxes. Not the crappy kludge that was there. It is also very easy to understand for newbies to understand. There is absolutely no reason to revert. You want more images, then add them, but you cannot do four in a row. That breaks accessibility rules for being too small as people with bad eyesight will not be able to see it. Add images, don't revert. Bgwhite (talk) 04:38, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Then why do other infoboxes have images just as small such as Ukrainians and Han Chinese? Khazar (talk) 04:41, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
They aren't. Rules change, they might have been done under older rules. The Image array is new as of September 2013. This is the new and better way of doing things. This will be added to all articles like the Russians eventually.
AGAIN!!! If you add images, it will look EXACTLY the same as before. THERE IS NO REASON TO REVERT, JUST ADD IMAGES. I'd suggest adding another row. Bgwhite (talk) 04:50, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
A source is much needed. Almost all the ethnic groups infoboxes have a collage or that "shitty" kludge method present on that page. Khazar (talk) 04:52, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
No a source is not needed. New templates get added, deleted and changed all the time. Use a simple template that will look exactly the same as the old method, but much easier to maintain. Where in the world do you need a source for that. It is common sense.
You have violated the Three revert rules and can be blocked. Revert the last edit and add images to make it exactly the same as before. Bgwhite (talk) 04:57, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
I'll stand aside for now. Khazar (talk) 04:59, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
However, the size will be shrunk. Khazar (talk) 05:00, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
I can see why you were upset, I left off adding Anna Kournikova. Leaving off the most beautiful Russian ever to have lived is a disgrace.  :)
I've added another row, so only one image is now missing. Go ahead and adjust the photo size as you see fit. I won't revert if you goto four photos in a row. btw... Ukrainians does use this new template. Bgwhite (talk) 05:15, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

April 2014[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at T-80 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Thomas.W talk 20:41, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Equipment of the Syrian Army shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Thomas.W talk 20:41, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Two things for you to remember until the next time: A) Use edit summaries explaining what you do and why you do it, and B) Report edit warring to the edit-warring noticeboard instead of letting it go on for days. Thomas.W talk 20:57, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Russians[edit]

Why have you revert my changes? The current list is rubbish. Fyodorov, Losev or Tsvetayeva as examples for great Russians? That's ridiculous. It need to be changed! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Misanthropo (talkcontribs) 20:15, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Some aren't even ethnic Russians. Read the talk pageKhazar (talk) 21:09, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Who of them is not ethnic Russian?! Everybody of them is at least 50 % Russian, that's enough. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Misanthropo (talkcontribs) 22:20, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: BMD-4[edit]

AFC-Logo.svg
The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Fiddle Faddle 19:03, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
Thank you! Khazar (talk) 22:18, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

I reverted your collage on the History of the Jews in Russia[edit]

I was surprised because usually your contributions are of very high quality and standard, but the collage you created was just weird. You can't just do such radical changes without discussing them first. I wrote a more detailed response on the article talk page, and for the future if you want to make such changes, make sure to use the talk page. 2.124.27.175 (talk) 00:31, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

I'm not letting any of this pass. I won't revert your edit because I'll talk to you about it. Khazar (talk) 02:55, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Strike that. I thought you were talking about Russians, my mistake. Khazar (talk) 02:56, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Nah just the Russian Jews :-D 2.124.27.175 (talk) 07:09, 16 July 2014 (UTC)