User talk:AlbertHall

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

THOMAS (neuroscience)[edit]

I see you have proposed THOMAS (neuroscience) for deletion. I did the same last year, but since that was removed [1], you may have to go through the WP:AFD process --Rumping (talk) 19:11, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

THOMAS (neuroscience)[edit]

I didn't see the earlier PROD that had been removed (which would disqualify the article for a PROD deletion). However, I have removed the PROD for a different reason, discussed on the article talk page. The theory, unsubstantiated though it may be, seems to be notable, based on the sources cited. The article might need substantial clean-up: removal of sources that do not mention the theory, addition of WP:MEDRS sources disputing the theory, etc. But it looks notable. If it isn't notable, it needs to go through an AfD. Thanks. - SummerPhD (talk) 21:02, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of THOMAS (neuroscience) for deletion[edit]

The article THOMAS (neuroscience) is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/THOMAS (neuroscience) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.--Rumping (talk) 09:34, 11 December 2010 (UTC)