User talk:Alburzador

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Hello, Alburzador, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking Button sig.png or Insert-signature.png or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Happy editing! SwisterTwister talk 20:10, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Áreas metropolitanas[edit]

Hola, ¿cómo te va, hablas español? Supongo que sí, si tus ediciones y aportaciones mayormente van dirigidas u orientadas hacia artículos relacionados con España y lo español. Estaba pensando en denunciar el pequeño problema que hemos tenido sobre las áreas metropolitanas españolas al panel de administradores de la Wikipedia. Sin embargo, no pienso que sea necesario ni beneficioso para nadie llevar las cosas al extremo. Discutir y pelear no es lo mío, no es algo que yo persiga. Me considero una persona tranquila, muy relajada, y honesta, y he de decirte que mi finalidad no es delatar ni descalificar a nadie, sino la justicia, y que, por ello, entiendo tu posición como la de otra persona. Querría proponerte si te apetece, de buena voluntad, colaborar conmigo y ayudarme a actualizar la sección de las áreas metropolitanas de una manera racional y humilde, y que no sea al azar.

Asimismo, quiero comunicarte que voy a volver a revertir la página. Y que a partir de ahí podemos debatir en la página principal ¿Te parece bien?

Los posibles debates que podríamos hacer son:

  • ¿Qué fuentes podemos utilizar como base? ESPON, AUDIT5, Ruiz Alarcos, etc.
  • Fuentes alternativas: ¿cuáles?

Gracias por tu atención, un cordial saludo. Alburzador (talk) 02:52, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Hola. Para definirse como una persona honesta y tranquila, no se comporta como tal. En Wikipedia está prohibido hacer ediciones discutidas, si no se llega a un consenso. Su edición es incompleta y está desactualizada, con datos originales del 2007 (ESPON), que para nada se corresponden con los probables datos actuales de las áreas metropolitanas, incluso son bastante discutidos y cuestionados por especialistas en demografía y movilidad en la propia España. Por tanto su edición lejos de informar, desinforma.
Un dato muy evidente, por poner un ejemplo, es el área metropolitana de Bilbao, que dudo mucho que hoy día sea mayor que el de Málaga. Si no existen datos con referencias fiables actualizados (2012 o 2013), no ha lugar reeditar dicho contenido. Casi es preferible incluir las cifras de población provincial, puesto que, sin datos metropolitanos a fecha de hoy, son los más orientativos. Para las ediciones que usted desea hacer, ya existe la página concreta, dedicada a las AM, hágalas allí.
En España, que no en Iberoamérica, la problemática de las áreas metropolitanas es más conocida, pero en el mundo anglosajón no. Y para ellos el dato de población provincial, a fecha de hoy, que no existen datos concretos de las áreas metropolitanas, puede ser más orientativo. Yo estaría encantado de incluir datos de los AM españoles de 2012, y no pondría ninguna clase de pegas, si existiera una referencia fiable, pero parece no haberlas. Por otro lado recordarle que Wikipedia no es una fuente primaria, por tanto, no se puede elaborar información ex professo para ningún artículo.
Yo no deseo llevar está discusión a más, y no deseo descalificarle, pero le advierto que como siga editando el artículo Spain a su parecer sin consensuar los cambios, conforme a las normas de Wikipedia, le denunciaré en el tablón por guerra de ediciones y vandalismo. Todos los que participamos en wikipedia deseamos informar y mejorar los contenidos, pero en este caso, no creo que su edición aporte datos que mejoren lo que ya expone el artículo. Saludos. --Bashevis6920 (talk) 10:31, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Stop, please[edit]

Stop vandalizing, please, or will force me to report you. Thank you.--LTblb (talk) 00:04, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

I already knew your actions. I repeat, stop vandalizing, please. Thank you.--LTblb (talk) 00:13, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
I beg your pardon? Where am I being a vandal? ::Reverting vandalism is not edit warring. However, editing from a slanted point of view, general insertion or removal of material, or other good-faith changes are not considered vandalism (WP:Vandalism). Alburzador (talk)
It's not just edit warring and vandalism, it's bullying.--LTblb (talk) 01:17, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
no, it is not... The reason i reverted you is not because of bullying, but coz I am kind and humble, and i prefer Honestity to Falseness... Alburzador (talk) 01:26, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

April 2013[edit]

Your recent editing history at Catalan people shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You are violating the 3RR. Please stop. Please go to Wikipedia:Dispute resolution If I continue to see reverts I will go to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring and you may be blocked. Everyone Dies In the End (talk) 02:30, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Talk page is for discussions[edit]

Please don't accuse editors of sock puppetry on talk pages. It is not the place for it. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations is. If you don't want to file it there you shouldn't be accusing editors of it.

Now, please discuss your dispute with him on Talk:Spain like adults. Start a conversation. This is how wikipedia works. It is a community and discussions are necessary.-- Everyone Dies In the End (talk) 06:15, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Alright... Alburzador (talk) 17:27, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

LTblb SPI — need more details[edit]

Hi. Regarding your SPI (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/LTblb), we need more specific details — if at all possible, at least one "diff" for each and every account or IP you've listed in your report, showing evidence of improper conduct and evidence that all of these accounts/IP's are being used by the same person. Otherwise, your report will probably be dismissed and no action taken on it. — Richwales (no relation to Jimbo) 01:47, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

May 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Venezuela may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:38, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Portugal[edit]

You are right - I mistook it for vandalism. My apologies. Ghmyrtle (talk) 22:28, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Mass edits regarding pronunciation (e.g. IPA deletions)[edit]

Where have you discussed the changes you are making to dozens of articles, among which is removing the IPA usages? This looks dubious... Shenme (talk) 04:55, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

This ^. Please use edit summaries at least to explain what you're doing. It's not obvious. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 10:02, 21 May 2015 (UTC)