User talk:Aleksi Peltola

License tagging for Image:15678 london-demo-7-2-2006.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:15678 london-demo-7-2-2006.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:05, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

April Fools Day :)[edit]

Hola Aleksi, my name is Rosa. :) Today is April Fools Day and I 'm playing a joke on a couple of finnish girlfriends of mine. Could you help me out by translating the following into Finnish? "Hello girls, thanks for your comments, I wasn't aware it was April Fools Day. Good bye, kisses". Could you do this please? Thanks in advance...¡Viva Finlandia! :) Rosa 11:03, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but I do not understand what you mean - there is no such language as "Finnish". We all speak Dutch with a thick Finnish accent. Sorry I could not be of help. I wish you luck and success in all your endeavors. Aleksi Peltola 22:52, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

LOL...sorry...could you translate into Dutch then? (I should have read the article on Finland before venturing this question LOL). Rosa 00:22, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! I've just read and there IS a language called Finnish! Just as I supposed! LOL Rosa 00:24, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Haha sorry that was my April Fools. Unfortuneately my Finnish is not so good as I have not lived there for a long time, my grammar is problematic, do not trust me:

Hei apulainen , kiitoksia ajaksi sinun huomautus , I tietämätön se Huhtikuu Hupsu Aika. Hyvä hei , suudelma.Aleksi Peltola 04:02, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, it's April 2nd now, so I couldn't use it :( ...it was a good April Fools you pulled on me though...LOL...you were the only one to be able to make a prank on me yesterday ;) Rosa 21:04, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attack[edit]

This might be construed as a personal attack, violating WP:NPA. *Dan T.* 23:00, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mr Vogt has proven himself to be less than civil.Aleksi Peltola 00:27, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's no excuse to be less than civil yourself. *Dan T.* 01:22, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I recommend showing more control over your temperament than you have been. 69.142.179.229 (talk) 03:34, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Finnish people[edit]

Your edits [1] to Finnish people were not constructive and were reverted. --Drieakko 05:23, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Sorry. Aleksi Peltola 08:05, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Scientology. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Wisdom89 _{(_T / ^C)} 14:20, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

everything I wrote was true, verified by facts on the public record. I shall say that L. Ron Hubbard, as well as his feeble-minded replacement David Miscavige, are pathological liars who selfishly use/used the poor followers of their cult for personal profit. That is the unvarnished truth, sorry if it is not neutral enough for your Wikipedian brain.Aleksi Peltola (talk) 14:24, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don't vandalize Scientology, ok? you're using language immaturely. I know I sometimes do that myself - sometimes to get a laugh out of it, but it's still, well, immature. — Rickyrab | Talk 14:29, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Scientology, you will be blocked from editing. --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 14:40, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stop spreading false lies about Scientology. What are your crimes? What are you afraid of? I bet you're a wife beater. And a child molester too. And what kind of name is Aleksi anyway? You must be a filthy homosexual. Just hurry up and get your life over with, you stupid SP. Can't you see we are the only ones that are right? The tech works, that alone gives us the right to apply it wherever we see fit, including Wikipedia! Gareth Chamberlain (talk) 14:45, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wouldn't a "false lie" be a true fact? Ghostwords (talk) 21:57, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ref "filthy homosexual", is it the sexuality you're trying to use as an insult, or your target's cleanliness? Having high hygeine standards is one thing, expressing bigotry is another - and the sort of behaviour best left outside Wiki. Ghostwords (talk) 22:05, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I bet you enjoy applying the tech between your legs, you brainwashed brit. Now get off my talk page Aleksi Peltola (talk) 15:21, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I resent the use of the word "Brit" (capital B, note) as an insult. It wasn't a Brit who came up with Scientology, and it was a British court which declared Hubbard an undesirable alien and prevented him entering the UK. Ghostwords (talk) 22:05, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism and personal attacks. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Gwernol 15:27, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Dmportrait.jpg[edit]

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Dmportrait.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cirt (talk) 21:59, 4 July 2008 (UTC) --Cirt (talk) 21:59, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kenneth Musser[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Kenneth Musser, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Stormbay (talk) 18:06, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]