User talk:Alex Bakharev
| Alex is currently, or is about to be, on vacation in real life and may not be able to respond immediately to queries. He may pop in now and then from an available online source. Happy editing! |
Archives:
[edit] Alex is alive!
I recoded your AlexNewArtBot. I'd love to figure out what your plans are with it, as it was MIA. tedder (talk) 03:31, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
-
- Thanks a lot, Tedder. I cannot emphasize enough how I am grateful for picking up this work! Alex Bakharev (talk) 03:35, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.
Vald (talk) 15:34, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
[edit] What's this?
| The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| I award this to you for helping to revert and protect against vandalism on Wikipedia. Danhomer (talk) 03:28, 4 November 2011 (UTC) |
[edit] The Signpost: 27 June 2011
- WikiProject report: The Continuous Convention: WikiProject Comics
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Proposed decision for Tree shaping case
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
[edit] The Signpost: 4 July 2011
- News and notes: Picture of the Year 2010; data challenge; brief news
- WikiProject report: The Star-Spangled WikiProject
- Featured content: Two newly promoted portals
- Arbitration report: Arb resigns while mailing list leaks continue; Motion re: admin
[edit] Article importance on Russia task force pages
Hello Alex! Since you are experienced in botovodstvo, could you help us with the issue discussed here? GreyHood Talk 15:21, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
[edit] WP:RUS
Note that the page has recently been split. Please, consider to use precise shortcuts. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 08:58, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks! Alex Bakharev (talk) 14:12, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Non-free rationale for File:Meller Allo.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Meller Allo.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 18:22, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Non-free rationale for File:Merab mamardashvili.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Merab mamardashvili.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 18:39, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
[edit] The Signpost: 11 July 2011
- From the editor: Stepping down
- Higher education summit: Wikipedia in Higher Education Summit recap
- In the news: Britannica and Wikipedia compared; Putin award criticized; possible journalistic sockpuppeting
- WikiProject report: Listening to WikiProject Albums
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Tree shaping case comes to a close
- Technology report: WMF works on its release strategy; secure server problems
[edit] Non-free rationale for File:Kim Scott.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Kim Scott.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 18:14, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Zinaida Reich DYK
Hi, Alex. I reviewed your article and made copy editing changes for the English. Also suggested a slight modification to your second suggested DYK hook - add that she was an actress and delete the "72 years" - if it were a rounder number, like 75 or 100, it might be more powerful. Best wishes Parkwells (talk) 21:15, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot for your work on this article. It is much better now! Alex Bakharev (talk) 22:59, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
[edit] File:Kim Scott.jpg
Sorry, I'm not convinced- the cover would be fine on an article about the book, but covers are rarely needed in articles about the authors. Nor could this serve as an identifying image, as it would be replaceable with a free alternative. Is there some reason that this particular cover is important and needs to be shown? J Milburn (talk) 23:25, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
- On the second thought I agree with you. I have deleted the image Alex Bakharev (talk) 00:22, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Pending changes
Hi.
It appears you applied 'Pending Changes' protection to the article Nasir al-Din al-Tusi (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) on 7 July [1]
Per the concluded RFC, there is currently no consensus to use that form of protection on any articles (c/f WP:PCPP).
Following a lot of discussion, no agreement could be formed for use of Pending Changes protection at this present time.
Currently, that is the only article on enwiki using 'PC protection'.
Therefore, could you please remove the PC-protection, and - if appropriate - feel free to apply semi-protection as may be necessary.
Best, Chzz ► 00:28, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
- Done Alex Bakharev (talk) 00:31, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
[edit] The Signpost: 18 July 2011
- In the news: Fine art; surreptitious sanitation; the politics of kyriarchic marginalization; brief news
- WikiProject report: Earn $$$ free pharm4cy WORK FROM HOME replica watches ViAgRa!!!
- Featured content: Historic last launch of the Space Shuttle Endeavour; Teddy Roosevelt's threat to behead official; 18th-century London sex manual
- Arbitration report: Motion passed to amend 2008 case: topic ban and reminder
- Technology report: Code Review backlog almost zero; What is: Subversion?; brief news
[edit] Melbourne meetup this Saturday
|
Next: Sunday, 15 January, 11:00am. North Melbourne Previous: ComputerBank, Melbourne, 3.00 p.m. Sunday October 9, 2011, before Wikimedia Australia Inc. AGM at 4.00 p.m. See here. |
Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup at North Melbourne this Saturday (23 July). Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne 16 Hope to see you there! JVbot (talk) 04:57, 20 July 2011 (UTC) (this automated message was delivered to all users at Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne/Participants)
[edit] DYK for Zinaida Reich
| On 20 July 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Zinaida Reich, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Zinaida Reich was expelled from school at the end of the eighth grade in the Soviet Union for her political activities? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Materialscientist (talk) 16:02, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Tsarina Golden Palace
Hello Alex. The article on Tsarina Golden Palace is tagged for copyediting and I am about to do this. The Kremlin web site calls it the "Golden Tsarina's Chamber". The article itself uses the phrase "Tsarina's Golden Chamber", which I think might be better because it's the chamber rather than the tsarina that is golden :)
In the history, I see that the article started its life with the title "The Tsarina's Golden Chamber", and that you moved it to its present tile because of MOS. I agree with this, at least because MOS says that article titles should not begin with "the". But I wonder if it might be good to move it to "Tsarina's Golden Chamber" (without "the" at the start). I would like to do this, but what is your view, please? --Stfg (talk) 08:45, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
- I actually don't sure about the correct name for the article. Russian word palata (палата, the same root as in English word palace) might mean both a building (palace) or a room (chamber). The article is about the building that is mostly notable because of the chamber. Indeed that is the chamber that is golden not the building but we are talking not only about the chamber but also about the outside building. It is confusing. If we could translate the word palata the way to keep the ambiguity it will be great. I will copy the section on the talk page of the article, might be somebody could give better arguments either way. I am personally lean for the name with the word palace but I an not to revert you if you move to the name with the word chamber Alex Bakharev (talk) 09:24, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
[edit] The Signpost: 25 July 2011
- Wikimedian in Residence interview: Wikimedian in Residence on Open Science: an interview with Daniel Mietchen
- Recent research: Talk page interactions; Wikipedia at the Open Knowledge Conference; Summer of Research
- WikiProject report: Musing with WikiProject Philosophy
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: New case opened; hyphens and dashes update; motion
- Technology report: Protocol-relative URLs; GSoC updates; bad news for SMW fans; brief news
[edit] The Signpost: 01 August 2011
- In the news: Consensus of Wikipedia authors questioned about Shakespeare authorship; 10 biggest edit wars on Wikipedia; brief news
- Research interview: The Huggle Experiment: interview with the research team
- WikiProject report: Little Project, Big Heart — WikiProject Croatia
- Featured content: Featured pictures is back in town
- Arbitration report: Proposed decision submitted for one case
- Technology report: Developers descend on Haifa; wikitech-l discussions; brief news
[edit] Boris Berezovsky - BLPN
Hi - I think you are aware but just in case - Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Boris_Berezovsky_.28businessman.29 - please comment thanks - Off2riorob (talk) 20:33, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
[edit] The Signpost: 08 August 2011
- News and notes: Wikimania a success; board letter controversial; and evidence showing bitten newbies don't stay
- In the news: Israeli news focuses on Wikimania; worldwide coverage of contributor decline and gender gap; brief news
- WikiProject report: Shooting the breeze with WikiProject Firearms
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Manipulation of BLPs case opened; one case comes to a close
- Technology report: Wikimania technology roundup; brief news
[edit] File permission problem with File:Cherepanov Engine.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Cherepanov Engine.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en
wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en
wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 04:46, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Non-free rationale for File:Korolev Kurchatov Keldysh.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Korolev Kurchatov Keldysh.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:06, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Non-free rationale for File:Korin russia walking away.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Korin russia walking away.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:06, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Non-free rationale for File:Korin Beggar.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Korin Beggar.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:06, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
[edit] The Signpost: 15 August 2011
- Women and Wikipedia: New Research, WikiChix
- WikiProject report: The Oregonians
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Abortion case opened, two more still in progress
- Technology report: Forks, upload slowness and mobile redirection
[edit] Renaming the article
- Hi,
Please help me. I have made en error in naming my article about a personality. How to correct it?--Gary4bendov (talk) 22:21, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
- I have moved Josephinne Yaroshevich article to the correct location. In future use the Move button to move articles with incorrect titles. In the standard skin the button is in the menu below the black triabngle right to the star (in the top right area of the screen). Read Help:move for more info. Alex Bakharev (talk) 22:44, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
[edit] The Signpost: 22 August 2011
- News and notes: Girl Geeks edit while they dine, candidates needed for forthcoming steward elections, image referendum opens
- WikiProject report: Images in Motion – WikiProject Animation
- Featured content: JJ Harrison on avian photography
- Arbitration report: After eleven moves, name for islands now under arbitration
- Technology report: Engineering report, sprint, and more testers needed
[edit] The Signpost: 29 August 2011
- News and notes: Abuse filter on all Wikimedia sites; Foundation's report for July; editor survey results
- Recent research: Article promotion by collaboration; deleted revisions; Wikipedia's use of open access; readers unimpressed by FAs; swine flu anxiety
- The pending changes fiasco: How an attempt to answer one question turned into a quagmire
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Tennis
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Four existing cases
- Technology report: The bugosphere, new mobile site and MediaWiki 1.18 close in on deployment
[edit] Renaming an image
Hello Alex!
I write to you as you are both an admin and a member of Eastern Orthodoxy project. Could you please give me a piece of advice. I'm new to Wikipedia but am striving to improve some articles and images on Orthodoxy (I'm Orthodox, my name is Elijah). Correcting both text and graphics for different articles, I've found some images have ugly names. The question is (pardon me for my stupidity I haven't manage to understand it from wiki documentation) how to rename an image. In fact I have some suspicion the point is I'm not "trusted user" yet. So the second question is - how can anyone become trusted (I believe you surely know this being yourself not only trusted but an admin). Regards, B7elijah (talk) 21:10, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
[edit] The Signpost: 05 September 2011
- News and notes: 24,000 votes later and community position on image filter still unclear; first index of editor satisfaction appears positive
- WikiProject report: Riding with WikiProject London Transport
- Sister projects: Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Opinion essay: The copyright crisis, and why we should care
- Arbitration report: BLP case closed; Cirt-Jayen466 nearly there; AUSC reshuffle
[edit] Andreas von Stierland (in russian Вельвен, Андреас фон)
Hello Alex Bakharev. Please help translate this article could to English. I translated, but know nothing Russian language. Please help me. The article is short. a greetings--Puedoeditar (talk) 18:54, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
[edit] The Signpost: 12 September 2011
- News and notes: Foundation reports on research, Kenya trip, Mumbai Wikiconference; Canada, Hungary and Estonia; English Wikinews forked
- WikiProject report: Politics in the Pacific: WikiProject Australian Politics
- Featured content: Wikipedians explain two new featured pictures
- Arbitration report: Ohconfucius sanctions removed, Cirt desysopped 6:5 and a call for CU/OS applications
- Technology report: What is: agile development? and new mobile site goes live
- Opinion essay: The Walrus and the Carpenter
[edit] Kirill Formanchuk
Алекс! Мы давно не общались, но сейчас надо. В вашем языковом разделе есть статья ru:Форманчук, Кирилл Викторович, которая в нашем разделе стоит на удалении. В ру-ВП многиеподобные статьи о мелких региональных политиках быстро сносятся. Почему так в ен-ВП, хотя статья о Кате Гордон в своё время была быстро удалена. Прошу вас внимательно присмотреться к этой статье и обсудить проблему с другими участниками. В нашем разделе сейчас наблюдается наплыв всякого рода виртуалов. Скорее всего связано с грядущими выборами президента и госдумы. --Torin (talk) 07:16, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
- The article refers to a New York Times article entirely devoted to this guy. Not that many Russian activists have similar articles, thus I think the guy is notable (or have a really good PR support). Maybe I am an inclusionist but I would rather have a biased article than no article, thus, I think the article should stay. I doubt that many voters in Yekaterinburg will be influenced by en-wiki articles one way or another. Alex Bakharev (talk) 08:09, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
- Понятно! Ну, я ни на чём настаиваю, но в целом его деятельность производит впечатление каких-то эскапад.
--Torin (talk) 08:52, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
- Я стараюсь определять notability по формальным признакм. Да, герой - какой-то шут гороховый, еще и с ЕР - связан. Но, если о нем пишет NYT, то формально условия notabilty - соблюдены. Вреда от этой статьи не вижу. Пускай себе висит. Alex Bakharev (talk) 12:11, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
- Понятно! Ну, я ни на чём настаиваю, но в целом его деятельность производит впечатление каких-то эскапад.
- Скажите, а качество статьи в NYT как-то учитывается? Там несколько фактических ошибок, видно, что автор просто не владеет русским языком и не очень разобрался. Так, походя написал проходную колонку из серии "Их нравы". Вот, характерный пример:
And so it was that Mr. Formanchuk became a leader of a budding movement to uphold motorists’ rights
...
Not everyone here approves of Mr. Formanchuk. The chairman of his activist group, Georgy Badyin,
- Второе предложение чистая правда, Бадьин - председатель КЗПА, а первое - вранье. Форманчук тогда был весьма начинающим и в судах за него боролись другие, тот же Бадьин. Никакой он не лидер был, да и не стал им потом. Локально известен своей клоунадой и не более того. Могу еще ошибок автора накидать, с пруфлинками. Mir76 (talk) 14:45, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
I don't think the notion that NYT article has errors would significantly affect the notability of the subject. In a way it even increases the public benefits of the wikipedia article: it is probably the only method to make English-speaking public aware of those inaccuracies. The article should represent the NYT info as well as corrections referenced to local Russian-language materials (including if necessary primary sources but not the vague "local knowledge"). Alex Bakharev (talk) 23:44, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Rokhlin
Hi,
with some delay (of just 5 years), I have responded to your remark at Talk:Vladimir_Rokhlin_(Soviet_mathematician). Probably the page is no longer in your watchlist, so I am leaving you a note here.
Sasha (talk) 04:49, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
[edit] The Signpost: 19 September 2011
- From the editor: Changes to The Signpost
- News and notes: Ushahidi research tool announced, Citizendium five years on: success or failure?, and Wikimedia DC officially recognised
- Sister projects: On the Wikinews fork
- WikiProject report: Back to school
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: ArbCom narrowly rejects application to open new case
- Technology report: MediaWiki 1.18 deployment begins, the alleged "injustice" of WMF engineering policy, and Wikimedians warned of imminent fix to magic word
- Popular pages: Article stats for the English Wikipedia in the last year
[edit] Non-free rationale for File:Neznaika friends cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Neznaika friends cover.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 11:20, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
[edit] A little present for ya
Hey Sasha, howzit? Remember a while ago...well shit...probably 2 years ago now, we had a difference of opinion on whether a photo of the An-225 in flight with Buran on top would satisfy fair use, given that there are other photos out there which we could try and get a free licence? Well that was my opinion, anyway lol. Well I finally got 'em.
File:Antonov An-225 with Buran at Le Bourget 1989 Manteufel.jpg and File:Antonov An-225 with Buran at Le Bourget 1989 Manteufel-2.jpg. Yay!
I've managed to get a heap of other beauties under a free licence as well...perhaps some will look familiar to you?
File:Tupolev Tu-144 in Hannover in 1972 Manteufel.jpg - File:Aeroflot Mil V-12 (Mi-12) Groningen Airport.jpg - File:Aeroflot Tupolev Tu-144 Paris Air Show 1975 Gilliand.jpg
Just spewing that I missed the Tu-144 era. It would have been a trip to have gotten on one. Anyway, hope all is good with you as well? Russavia Let's dialogue 23:39, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
- Great!!!!! Alex Bakharev (talk) 00:05, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
- Cool photos indeed. GreyHood Talk 12:06, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
[edit] The Signpost: 26 September 2011
- Recent research: Top female Wikipedians, reverted newbies, link spam, social influence on admin votes, Wikipedians' weekends, WikiSym previews
- News and notes: WMF strikes down enwiki consensus, academic journal partnerships, and eyebrows raised over minors editing porn-related content
- In the news: Sockpuppeting journalist recants, search dominance threatened, new novels replete with Wikipedia references
- WikiProject report: A project in overdrive: WikiProject Automobiles
- Featured content: The best of the week
[edit] Ivan Poddubny
Здравствуйте. Чем вы можете, исходя из источников, аргументировать такую свою правку? Вы точно поняли из-за чего пара участников начала вандализм преамбулы статьи в обход их содержания? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.92.176.105 (talk) 20:56, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
- In this particular dif I have removed unneeded parentheses and moved a reference a few words ahead. I am not sure what you have found wrong with it. The previous edit is related to the national identification of Poddubny. This is a recurrent problem in Wiki concerning many figures who are usually identified as Russian outside Russia/Soviet Union but were born in the modern Ukraine or/and of Ukrainian ethnicity. The article does not provide sources whether he identified himself as Russian or Ukrainian, but there are references that he is from Ukrainian Cossacks aka Zaporozhizhian Cossacks. He is unlikely to ever represented Ukrainian teams but he was a member of teams of Russian Empire and Soviet Union. I have changed the article lead accordingly. I have chosen the tem Ukrainian Cossacks rather than Zaporozhizhian Cossacks because I wanted to keep the word Ukrainian that is important for some readers. Alex Bakharev (talk) 07:14, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
[edit] The Signpost: 3 October 2011
- News and notes: Italian Wikipedia shuts down over new privacy law; Wikimedia Sverige produce short Wikipedia films, Sue Gardner calls for empathy
- In the news: QRpedia launches to acclaim, Jimbo talks social media, Wikipedia attracts fungi, terriers and Greeks bearing gifts
- WikiProject report: Kia ora WikiProject New Zealand
- Featured content: Reviewers praise new featured topic: National treasures of Japan
- Arbitration report: Last call for comments on CheckUser and Oversight teams
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
[edit] Nomination for deletion of Template:Rtd
Template:Rtd has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. SchuminWeb (Talk) 01:19, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Nomination for deletion of Template:Rk
Template:Rk has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. SchuminWeb (Talk) 01:32, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
[edit] The Signpost: 10 October 2011
- Opinion essay: The conservatism of Wikimedians
- News and notes: Largest ever donation to WMF, final findings of editor survey released, 'Terms of use' heavily revised
- In the news: Uproar over Italian shutdown, the varying reception of BLP mischief, and Wikipedia's doctor-evangelist
- WikiProject report: The World's Oldest People
- Featured content: The weird and the disgusting
[edit] Mark Kac protection
Hi, you protected, for good reasons, the page on Mark Kac back in 2008. I don't think this protection is needed any more. Of course stuff could resurface but it looks like it has been quiet for the past 3 years or so. Can you unprotect it? Volunteer Marek 18:06, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
- Done Alex Bakharev (talk) 19:51, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
-
- Thanks! Volunteer Marek 19:53, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
[edit] The Signpost: 17 October 2011
- News and notes: Arabic Wikipedia gets video intros, Smithsonian gifts images, and WikiProject Conservatism scrutinized
- In the news: Why Wikipedia survives while others haven't; Wikipedia as an emerging social model; Jimbo speaks out
- WikiProject report: History in your neighborhood: WikiProject NRHP
- Featured content: Brazil's boom-time dreams of naval power: The ed17 explains the background to a new featured topic
[edit] Survey for new page patrollers
|
New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Alex Bakharev! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey |
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Wiki Media Foundation at 10:56, 25 October 2011 (UTC).
- Done Alex Bakharev (talk) 04:51, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
[edit] The Signpost: 24 October 2011
- From the editors: A call for contributors
- Opinion essay: There is a deadline
- Interview: Contracting for the Foundation
- WikiProject report: Great WikiProject Logos
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Abortion; request for amendment on Climate Change case
- Technology report: WMF launches coding challenge, WMDE starts hiring for major new project
[edit] The Signpost: 31 October 2011
- Opinion essay: The monster under the rug
- Recent research: WikiSym; predicting editor survival; drug information found lacking; RfAs and trust; Wikipedia's search engine ranking justified
- News and notes: German Wikipedia continues image filter protest
- Discussion report: Proposal to return this section from hiatus is successful
- WikiProject report: 'In touch' with WikiProject Rugby union
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Abortion case stalls, request for clarification on Δ, discretionary sanctions streamlined
- Technology report: Wikipedia Zero announced; New Orleans successfully hacked
[edit] Hungry?
| You look hungry. Danhomer (talk) 03:30, 4 November 2011 (UTC) |
[edit] The Signpost: 7 November2011
- Special report: A post-mortem on the Indian Education Program pilot
- Discussion report: Special report on the ArbCom Elections steering RfC
- WikiProject report: Booting up with WikiProject Computer Science
- Featured content: Slow week for Featured content
- Arbitration report: Δ saga returns to arbitration, while the Abortion case stalls for another week
[edit] The Signpost: 14 November 2011
- News and notes: ArbCom nominations open, participation grants finalized, survey results on perceptions on Wikipedia released
- WikiProject report: Having a Conference with WikiProject India
- Arbitration report: Abortion and Betacommand 3 in evidence phase, three case requests outstanding
[edit] The Signpost: 21 November 2011
- Discussion report: Much ado about censorship
- WikiProject report: Working on a term paper with WikiProject Academic Journals
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: End in sight for Abortion case, nominations in 2011 elections
- Technology report: Mumbai and Brighton hacked; horizontal lists have got class
[edit] The Signpost: 28 November 2011
- News and notes: Arb's resignation sparks lightning RfC, Fundraiser 2011 off to a strong start, GLAM in Qatar
- In the news: The closed, unfriendly world of Wikipedia, fundraiser fun and games, and chemists vs pornstars
- Recent research: Quantifying quality collaboration patterns, systemic bias, POV pushing, the impact of news events, and editors' reputation
- WikiProject report: The Signpost scoops The Bugle
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 06:08, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned non-free image File:Lev Yashin.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Lev Yashin.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}to your talk page. - If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:21, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
[edit] The Signpost: 05 December 2011
- News and notes: Amsterdam gets the GLAM treatment, fundraising marches on, and a flourish of new admins
- In the news: A Wikistream of real time edits, a call for COI reform, and cracks in the ivory tower of knowledge
- Discussion report: Trial proposed for tool apprenticeship
- WikiProject report: This article is about WikiProject Disambiguation. For other uses...
- Featured content: This week's Signpost is for the birds!
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 18:03, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned non-free image File:Obruchev za tainami plutona.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Obruchev za tainami plutona.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}to your talk page. - If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 19:17, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Non-free rationale for File:Polunin in Israel.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Polunin in Israel.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:27, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
[edit] The Signpost: 12 December 2011
- Opinion essay: Wikipedia in Academe – and vice versa
- News and notes: Research project banner ads run afoul of community
- In the news: Bell Pottinger investigation, Gardner on gender gap, and another plagiarist caught red-handed
- WikiProject report: Spanning Nine Time Zones with WikiProject Russia
- Featured content: Wehwalt gives his fifty cents; spies, ambushes, sieges, and Entombment
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 17:13, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned non-free image File:Amalrik.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Amalrik.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:51, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
[edit] File:Amalrik.jpg
I have just rescued File:Amalrik.jpg, which you uploaded, from probable deletion on Christmas Day. Somehow it was removed from the article Andrei Amalrik and tagged with an "orphaned image" template. I had just uploaded a file with Amalrik's signature to the Commons for use in the article, so I caught the potential deletion before it took place. Both the image and the signature file are now displayed in an infobox, and I have deleted the "orphan" template from the image file page. Since you're an administrator, you can judge whether I've acted correctly. By the way, I actually met Amalrik in 1977 in Bloomington, Indiana. -- Cuppysfriend (talk) 00:21, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot! The problem is that the file is claimed under "fair use" and the fair use rationale that I wrote is not very convincing. It was OK a few years ago but Wikipedia seems to significantly raise the requirements for fair use since then. I do believe that the fair use claim is valid but it will be difficult to argue if somebody would put it to deletion. Do you by any chance have an Amalrik photo with your copyright that you can release as GFDL or Creative Commons? Or may be you know an Amalrik photo with a story behind it so the fair use claim will be of better merit? Alex Bakharev (talk) 02:25, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- Glad to have been of help, but no, I don't have a free-use photo of Amalrik, but I've been looking for one. More things are being digitalized all the time, so maybe something will turn up. Cheers! -- Cuppysfriend (talk) 23:35, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks! Cheers indeed!
- I found this using a Bing search: http://www.belousenko.com/wr_Amalrik.htm Since I don't read Russian, maybe you can look at it and see if the photo of Amalrik can qualify as fair use. Also, would you please check my Google-translation Russian in the description of the Amalrik signature file and correct it? http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Andrei_Amalrik_signature.JPG More cheers! -- Cuppysfriend (talk) 00:04, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
- Glad to have been of help, but no, I don't have a free-use photo of Amalrik, but I've been looking for one. More things are being digitalized all the time, so maybe something will turn up. Cheers! -- Cuppysfriend (talk) 23:35, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
[edit] The Signpost: 19 December 2011
- News and notes: Anti-piracy act has Wikimedians on the defensive, WMF annual report released, and Indic language dynamics
- In the news: To save the wiki: strike first, then makeover?
- Discussion report: Polls, templates, and other December discussions
- WikiProject report: A dalliance with the dismal scientists of WikiProject Economics
- Featured content: Panoramas with Farwestern and a good week for featured content
- Arbitration report: The community elects eight arbitrators
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 03:22, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
[edit] The Signpost: 26 December 2011
- Recent research: Psychiatrists: Wikipedia better than Britannica; spell-checking Wikipedia; Wikipedians smart but fun; structured biological data
- News and notes: Fundraiser passes 2010 watermark, brief news
- WikiProject report: The Tree of Life
- Arbitration report: Three open cases, one set for acceptance, arbitrators formally appointed by Jimmy Wales
- Technology report: Wikimedia in Go Daddy boycott, and why you should 'Join the Swarm'
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 02:53, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
[edit] The Signpost: 02 January 2012
- Interview: The Gardner interview
- News and notes: Things bubbling along as Wikimedians enjoy their holidays
- WikiProject report: Where are they now? Part III
- Featured content: Ghosts of featured content past, present, and future
- Arbitration report: New case accepted, four open cases, terms begin for new arbitrators
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 14:58, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
[edit] Whitewashing of Boris Berezovsky article
Privet! I'd appreciate if you could comment at this section http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:ANI#Whitewashing_of_Boris_Berezovsky_article Thank you! 170.148.198.157 (talk) 09:20, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you for your contributions! At least one unbiased opinion. Now you've finally noticed about the timing of the article. Didn't you know that before?( 170.148.198.157 (talk) 11:14, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
[edit] The Signpost: 09 January 2012
- Technological roadmap: 2011's technological achievements in review, and what 2012 may hold
- News and notes: Fundraiser 2011 ends with a bang
- WikiProject report: From Traditional to Experimental: WikiProject Jazz
- Featured content: Contentious FAC debate: a week in review
- Arbitration report: Four open cases, proposed decision in Betacommand 3
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 03:38, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia Day Melbourne Meetup
Hi there. Just inviting youmto the Melbourne meetup this Sunday at 11am, to celebrate our 11th anniversary. Details on that page. Hope to see you there! SteveBot (talk) 01:41, 11 January 2012 (UTC) (on behalf of Steven Zhang)
[edit] The Signpost: 16 January 2012
- Special report: English Wikipedia to go dark on January 18
- Sister projects: What are our sisters up to now?
- News and notes: WMF on the looming SOPA blackout, Wikipedia turns 11, and Commons passes 12 million files
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Beer
- Featured content: Lecen on systemic bias in featured content
- Arbitration report: Four open cases, Betacommand case deadlocked, Muhammad images close near
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 05:28, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
[edit] The Signpost: 23 January 2012
- News and notes: SOPA blackout, Orange partnership
- WikiProject report: The Golden Horseshoe: WikiProject Toronto
- Featured content: Interview with Muhammad Mahdi Karim and the best of the week
- Arbitration report: Four open cases, proposed decision in Muhammad images, AUSC call for applications
- Technology report: Looking ahead to MediaWiki 1.19 and related issues
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 17:43, 26 January 2012 (UTC)