Your addition to Social skills has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. MrOllie (talk) 20:05, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
Alishayankhan0, you are invited to the Teahouse
Recent edits to Consumer protection
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to the Consumer protection article. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. Thank you! Technopat (talk) 19:16, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Advertising regulation. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.
Note: Incoherent English of these edits is indistinguishable from vandalism. See Competence is required. Dennis Bratland (talk) 19:53, 31 July 2013 (UTC)