User talk:Aljullu

Welcome to Wikipedia

Welcome!

Hello, Aljullu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 

— Moe ε 19:53, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

Catalan culture challenge

I've seen on your userpage that you speak Catalan: From March 16 to April 15 we will be organising the Catalan Culture Challenge, a Wikipedia editing contest in which victory will go to those who start and improve the greatest number of articles about 50 key figures of Catalan culture. You can take part by creating or expanding articles on these people in your native language (or any other one you speak). We look forward to seeing you! Amical Wikimedia--Kippelboy (talk) 08:41, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Recent edit to Utility cooperative

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your recent edit to Utility cooperative added the name of an apparently non-notable entity. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article to establish notability. If you wish to create such an article, please confirm that your subject is notable according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you! Param Mudgal ^talk? 11:47, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Aljullu. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Aljullu. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Carles Puigdemont, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Template talkpage

I left you my aswer on INH issue--ILoveCaracas (talk) 00:49, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Catalan independence

Hola Aljullu. No te niego que soc anti indepe, pero para que nos entendamos. Creo que se puede crear una seccion estable en las que los antis y pros esten de acuerdo. Te parece si lo intentamos? Creo que la forma de conseguirlo pasa por no entrar en el fondo, y no escribir nada que pueda rebatirse con un "si pero...". 94.204.228.165 (talk) 21:01, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

BallenaBlanca

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Iñaki LL (talk) 22:10, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Sourcing

Your addition of unionism requires a source and so I have reverted your addition. I have every right to remove unsourced statements, see WP:RS. ♫ RichardWeiss talk contribs 19:19, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

October 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Catalonia, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dom from Paris (talk) 15:41, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

@Domdeparis: thanks for noticing! I already added a source. Usually, when a statement doesn't have a backing reference, you would add Template:Citation needed instead of removing the sentence. --Aljullu (talk) 15:46, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

There was no need for a citation needed tag because there was already a citation but what was in the text did not reflect the source. You should not have reverted my edit without first adding the source as was requested. This is policy, everything in wikipedia has to be verifiable especially with a topic as touchy as this one. You have reinstated the word embezzlement which is not the charge that is being brought as per the sources but "misuse of public funds" this is potentially much more serious. Please do not WP:SYNTH sources. Dom from Paris (talk) 16:05, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

@Domdeparis: Thanks for fixing that, you're right the source says 'misuse of public funds' instead of 'embezzlement' (even though other sources say the opposite [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]). I'm not sure if there is a difference between them in Spanish law, so I thought both definitions were ok and I just left the one that was there prior to your edit, but I have no problem with any of them. --Aljullu (talk) 16:16, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Aljullu. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Aljullu. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Nationalist

The level of the discussion at the talk page of Puigdemont is so low I don't want to answer there. I still don't see a reason to change or remove the original term, but as far as I'm concerned either one of the three ('nationalist', 'pro-independence' or 'independence supporter') is fine. to answer your last question not with all, but politicians with a very defined ideology do. Check Julio Anguita, Pandeli Majko, John Ellis (Liberal politician), John Smith (Conservative politician) etc. For nationalist politician there are countless examples as I showed you as you can easily find yourself, and they are included mainly in the lead of politicians that seek independence or a higher degree of autonomy for their region. I did not see the term used in the lead of any of the examples cited by Iñaki. In English, nationalist by itself does not carry the negative connotation mentioned by Iñaki. See Nationalism which states:

In practice, nationalism can be seen as positive or negative depending on context and individual outlook. Nationalism has been an important driver in independence movements, such as the Greek Revolution, the Irish Revolution, the Zionist movement that created modern Israel, and the dissolution of the Soviet Union. Conversely, radical nationalism combined with racial hatred was also a key factor in the Holocaust perpetrated by Nazi Germany.

--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 16:41, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Stories from Reuters and other press agencies

I noticed that the link you added here had broken, so I replaced it. This is something that happens with stories from news agencies such as Reuters, Associated Press, and AFP that are republished in newspapers and other media. When you find a story from one of them, it's best to go to the agency's site and link directly to their version. The stories still may disappear, but they're likely to last much longer than at one of the sites that republishes their content, such as the New York Times or MSNBC. Cheers, BlackcurrantTea (talk) 15:27, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:European Language Equality Network

Hello, Aljullu. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "European Language Equality Network".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:30, 16 March 2021 (UTC)