User talk:Alkazzi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Image copyright problem with Image:Bsi logo.gif[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Bsi logo.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 14:00, 15 October 2007 (UTC)


Fair use rationale for Image:BSI logo.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:BSI logo.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 14:25, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

October 2007[edit]

Information.svg Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from British Standards. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as the text has been restored from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. OnoremDil 15:14, 15 October 2007 (UTC)


Fair use rationale for Image:Bsi logo.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Bsi logo.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI 14:51, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Bsi logo.gif)[edit]

Nuvola apps important blue.svg Thanks for uploading Image:Bsi logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:38, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:BSI logo.gif)[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading Image:BSI logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:04, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Kitemark.pdf)[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading Image:Kitemark.pdf. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:21, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Guidance on footnotes[edit]

Hi, in ISO 9000 you are adding rather redundant looking citations. As footnotes in Wikipedia articles are hyperlinks it is not necessary to put in Harvard style parenthetical citations in the text as well as footnotes. You should note that it is also unnecessary to ever repeat a footnote as if the <ref> tag is named (like <ref name="Times2010">Citation here</ref>), you can include a second footnote to the same footnote text by using the name in a single ref tag (like <ref name="Times2010"/>, note the use of "/"). Lastly (more unusually) if you fancy using Harvard style inside footnotes, you can create a separate Sources section and cross refer to it in an footnote or by embedding the reference anywhere in the text using {{harv}} templates, you can see an example at Hoxne Hoard. See WP:FNNR for some principles behind more complex layouts.

Some standard guidelines

Footnotes can be added inline to the body of your text using <ref> tags. An example looks like:

JavaScript is used on webpages today.<ref>Smith, John (2005), ''JavaScript 101'', ISBN 938223445333</ref>

And the resultant text would look like: JavaScript is used on webpages today.1

With the superscript 1 being a link to a footnote at the bottom of the page automatically created by inserting the code: {{reflist}}

An easy to follow standard guide is at WP:Referencing for beginners with citation templates and a primer for general editing is at WP:How to edit a page (concise).

Thanks, (talk) 18:43, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Your article has been moved to AfC space[edit]

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Alkazzi/BS OHSAS 18001 has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/BS OHSAS 18001, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 11:34, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

AFC-Logo Decline.svg
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

AFC-Logo.svg
ISO 20121, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

ChrisGualtieri (talk) 04:30, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

ISO 50001[edit]

Hi! Why did u delete the link to the contents? I think it is an important one... ISO_50001#External_links --FW8100 (talk) 10:24, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

organisation in ISO 9000[edit]

I have sources that indicate "organisation" is British English, including wikt:organisation. Do you have some source that states otherwise? --A D Monroe III (talk) 21:56, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

The source that states otherwise is the Oxford English Dictionary, which accepts 'organisation' but prefers 'organization'. In the context of ISO 9000 - which is owned by the International Organization for Standardization (note the spelling) - it seems more appropriate to use the 'z' spelling.

I'll go along with that. I prefer 'z' myself. But, on something that isn't cut-and-dried, your edit summary seems a bit harsh. The article used 's' for months or years, and got changed recently without comment; I assumed it was just another American 'correcting' the British spelling. --A D Monroe III (talk) 15:27, 20 November 2013 (UTC)