User talk:Amalthea

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Feel free to insult me!

Main page history[edit]

I miss it. Did I miss a change? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:42, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

A change in the API broke the tool, and you are the first to report it. :( Amalthea 11:54, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
Fixed, thanks for the report. We're missing a month's worth now of course ... Amalthea 12:03, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

E-mail sent to you[edit]

Mail-message-new.svg
Hello, Amalthea. Please check your email – you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.

NintendoFan (Talk, Contribs) 10:49, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

User:Amalthea (bot)[edit]

Hello Amalthea, I was reviewing currently approved bots with unusual flags, an noticed yours has the rollbacker flag. Which bot task requires this permission? Thanks, — xaosflux Talk 02:00, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

None currently, I've removed it from the group. Thanks, Amalthea 08:52, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Fields Medal page[edit]

Hello there,I'm that user who's been the victim of editing the Fields Medal page(i.e.I got blocked with charge of Vandalism.).I've got three question:1)When the current protected status of that page ends,Does the page current contents remain in place or they are replaced with the old version? 2)I've prepared a new and somehow comprehensive table about Fields medalists.I posted this table on the discussion section of the Fields Medal page,and I request for comments about this(If You come there and see my that table I will be really glad,and don't forget to put your comment about it down there!;-)),but so far,just one person did so.Is it normal? 3)Should I submit a request for edit to replace the new table with current one?Or should I wait for reaching a consensus?Thank You. Rezameyqani (talk) 07:50, 19 August 2014 (UTC)Rezameyqani (talk) 08:19, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

SPI overview page stopped updating[edit]

Hi. It appears that your bot has stopped updating the SPI overview page (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cases/Overview). The last update was 10 hours ago (this edit). — Richwales (no relation to Jimbo) 04:06, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Fixed, thanks for the notice! Amalthea 13:26, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi Amalthea, I think your bot has had another hiccup as the SPI page hasn't updated in several hours.--Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 21:17, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
Thanks, Ponyo -- seems to have recovered on its own, but I'll try and find out what caused it.
Cheers, Amalthea 07:24, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────Stopped again. :-( — Richwales (no relation to Jimbo) 04:56, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Somewhat unrelated, but Template:Webhostblock links to a non-existent section there. ⁓ Hello71 19:52, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Cyberoam[edit]

Hi I may be completely wrong but this page

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyberoam

seems to me to be

a) a blatent advert and b) may be repetition of a previously deleted page since you deleted the talk page

It was (re?)created a few days after the previous page was removed, probably for the same concerns.

All of the links and x-refs are basically Google fodder for the company's own products. I would prefer if this kind of thing was deleted.

I was going to tag it as spam with this on the talk page them saw you had deleted the previous talk page as it was linked to a non-existent page

What to do?

Tumbles — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tumbledown (talkcontribs) 19:18, 27 September 2014 (UTC)