User talk:Aminami
My name is Anand Khare, Currently I am located in Ropar (Punjab) in India. To contact me you can mail me at my email id anandkhare@hotmail.comAnandkharebsnl (talk) 11:02, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Suresh Kumar Shetkar[edit]
A tag has been placed on Suresh Kumar Shetkar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Laurent (talk) 14:39, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
I have reverted your comment here. Wikipedia is not interested in the opinions of Rio Tinto. --Anthony.bradbury"talk" 21:07, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
Copyright problems with Inside : Mumbai Terror Attack[edit]
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Inside : Mumbai Terror Attack, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.gomolo.in/features/article.aspx?ArticleID=241. As a copyright violation, Inside : Mumbai Terror Attack appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Inside : Mumbai Terror Attack has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Inside : Mumbai Terror Attack and send an email with the message to permissions-en
wikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions. - If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Inside : Mumbai Terror Attack with a link to where we can find that note.
- If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Inside : Mumbai Terror Attack.
- If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Inside : Mumbai Terror Attack and send an email with the message to permissions-en
However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Sarilox (talk) 17:44, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
Unblocked me[edit]
{{unblock-ip|1=59.95.96.232|2=Abusing [[WP:Sock puppetry|multiple accounts]]: Abusing [[WP:Sock puppetry|multiple accounts]]: Please see: [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aminami]]|3=Shirik}} Dear All I have been blocked for editing anything on Wiki by Shirik. reason is multiple account. Here I am assure you that I dont have multiple account. You deteceted all accounts as multiple by same IP address. I provide services in the organisation where Mr. Hishmi works that organisation works on local network and internet sharing so whenever i log with the network of that organisation I use same IP which other blocked user use. you thought that I am same user. You can see my all previous edits. I given my comment on Hishmi Jamil Husain Page but that was my openion and infact asked others that if my openion is right or wrong? Please see my previous edits and tell me can i bypass policy of Wiki? I request you spare me from other blocked accounts so that i can make more updates Aminami (talk) 04:17, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
Aminami (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have been blocked for editing anything on Wiki by Shirik. reason is multiple account. Here I am assure you that I dont have multiple account. You deteceted all accounts as multiple by same IP address. I provide services in the organisation where Mr. Hishmi works. That organisation use local network and internet sharing so whenever i log on that organisation I use same IP which other blocked user use. you thought that I am same user. You can see my all previous edits. I given my comment on Hishmi Jamil Husain Page but that was my openion and infact asked others that if my openion is right or wrong? Please see my previous edits and tell me can i bypass policy of Wiki? I request you spare me from other blocked accounts so that i can make more edits.
Decline reason:
In addition to the WP:CHECKUSER evidence there is compelling behavioral evidence that suggests that you are in fact the same person. Beeblebrox (talk) 07:57, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- I'm not an admin so can't unblock you, but I don't think you're a sock and am trying to get you unblocked. Hopefully it will be resolved soon. SmartSE (talk) 16:01, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
Aminami (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
- Please tell me how can I prove that I am not the same person you merge with me? I can provide any evidence that I am not same person *I have already mention that I used same IP with other users because sometime we use same network due to the same office. *The page of Hishmi Jamil Husain (Which was the main reason for blocking me)was created by a user hishmi. I saw the page and inserted few links only. *There is no reason for me that first I will create another id like hishmi and than I'll create a page of Hishmi Jamil Husain however I had already created many article and faced lot of AfDs. *I have already created many articles and faced lot of AfDs but never use slang language or abuse to participants, you can see my history, why should I do this for Hishmi Jamil Husain? *I never tried to create fake or non notable articles, and my editing history is very fair. *and if these arguments do not satisfy you I only can assure you that I'll take care so that I do not get blocked in future.
Decline reason:
If that's the case, then you have your coworkers to blame. In any event, 
Confirmed as a sock puppet. Talk page editing privileges revoked. –MuZemike 16:31, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Related discussion[edit]
To any admins reviewing this unblock request, please see User_talk:Tnxman307#User:Aminami. Thanks SmartSE (talk) 15:49, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
I'm confused! You may wish to make a WP:CLEANSTART SmartSE (talk) 16:41, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
Nomination of Archana Sharma for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Archana Sharma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Archana Sharma(2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — Finemann (talk) 23:36, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Archana Sharma[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Archana Sharma, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. — Finemann (talk) 23:42, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
File:Ajay Awasthi Shooting.jpg listed for deletion[edit]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ajay Awasthi Shooting.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sreejith K (talk) 12:26, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
Notification of automated file description generation[edit]
Your upload of File:Arunima Kumar at Khajuraho Dance Festival.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.
This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:18, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Sanjeev Nag for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanjeev Nag until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.