User talk:Andreas Philopater

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome![edit]

Although some prefer welcoming newcomers with cookies, I find fruit to be a healthier alternative. Face-smile.svg

Welcome to Wikipedia, Andreas Philopater! I am Fetchcomms and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time. I just wanted to say "Hi!" and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some important pages that you might find helpful:

But don't forget to:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh, and when you post on talk pages you should always sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post (AKA your signature). If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, visit the help chat, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!  fetchcomms 00:36, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Nathaniel Westlake[edit]

I see that you created this article and cited his entry in "Stained Glass Marks and Monograms" by Joyce Little. Do you still have access to this publication? I have recently created an article on Francis Skeat and I would be most grateful if you could add any additional information that may be contained in Little's book. Thanks for any help you can give. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 07:03, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Sorry - as a translator I move from topic to topic, and don't get to the bottom of any of them. I don't have a copy of this book in my possession. (I can find it in a library, but I imagine it would be just as much trouble for me as for you.) --Andreas Philopater (talk) 14:01, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Autopatrolled[edit]

Wikipedia Autopatrolled.svg

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

  • This permission does not give you any special status or authority
  • Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
  • You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
  • If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it
If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing!HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:47, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Survey for new page patrollers[edit]

NPPbarnstar.jpg

New page patrol – Survey Invitation


Hello Andreas Philopater! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

  • If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
  • If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.


You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Wiki Media Foundation at 11:04, 25 October 2011 (UTC).


A barnstar for you![edit]

Barnstar of Diligence Hires.png The Barnstar of Diligence
For fixing the problems of The bride is beautiful, but she is married to another man. Bearian (talk) 20:12, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

So obvious : great job Andreas. Would you(*) mind performing the same on Azzam Pasha quotation that needs the same work not much more difficult as for the bride married to another man...

(*) Why you and not me ? Because there is right now a momentum and you have a "virginity" on the topics related to the I-P conflict that will permit to make improvements fast and with consensus around you.

Pluto2012 (talk) 21:17, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the vote of confidence, but having looked at the Azzam Pasha quotation article, I think it is rather more of a hornet's nest than this one, and I'm not especially inclined to touch a question so far from my areas of expertise. I tried to trim back "bride is beautiful" to something that addressed the issues raised at AFD (which is one of the things that AFD is good for). I wouldn't know how to begin to do the same for Azzam Pasha. --Andreas Philopater (talk) 21:34, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Aileen Soares[edit]

Hi! I see you have kept the article in your userspace. I nominated it for deletion but changed my mind after going into detail, however it was still deleted. I want to take it back to the mainspace but will need to work on the structure first. Would you mind if I do the modifications in your space? Samar Talk 08:01, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Never mind, I have re-created the article, please see this. Samar Talk 12:01, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
Well, that doesn't seem to have lasted long. Do feel free to work in my userspace until we have something speedy-proof. --Andreas Philopater (talk) 20:19, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
Yes, unfortunately another admin immediately deleted it. Again notability issue. Also I could find only 4-5 good references in newspaper and a couple more in the school website but nothing beyond that and information about her is very limited. With this I am sure the article will be deleted again, unless she wins an award or more information about her is available. Samar Talk 05:47, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
Would you be willing to put all the references/info you have in the userspace version? I'd like to take a look. --Andreas Philopater (talk) 06:37, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
References
  • School website
[1] - short biography on the SJC website
[2] - no substantial info
  • The Express Tribune
[3] - No extensive details except that she will receive a 'bouquet'
[4]
[5]
[6]
  • Dawn News
[7]

Featuring your work on Wikipedia's front page: DYKs[edit]

Symbol question.svg Thank you for your recent articles, including Sebastiano Montelupi, which I read with interest. When you create an extensive and well referenced article, you may want to have it featured on Wikipedia's main page in the Did You Know section. Articles included there will be read by thousands of our viewers. To do so, add your article to the list at T:TDYK. Let me know if you need help, Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:05, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
Thanks, I'm flattered. What did you have in mind? "Did you know that the first Polish Royal Posts were run by Italian bankers?" --Andreas Philopater (talk) 15:19, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
That sounds interesting enough, I'd just add a note about 16th century somewhere. Let me know if you need any assistance with the DYKing process. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 23:25, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Please note that due to DYKs being on a time limit (~5 days since the article's creation), it should be nominated today. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 16:26, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Face-smile.svg Piotr, I'm sure Andreas won't mind if you nominate this article yourself before the time runs out before the end of the day. Cheers! Poeticbent talk 17:54, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
There, all done. Although I'm not sure I did it right. --Andreas Philopater (talk) 22:37, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

I don't intend to change Vilnius, but this case is different from Kraków. Kraków name stayed the same throughout history, as far as its mostly Polish speaking inhabitants were concerned. Vilnius, however, became throughout polonized, to a degree that its Lithuanian name was not used much for several centuries (it was inhabited, in 1939, by something like 40% Poles, 40% Jews, and <10% Lithuanians). The name Wilno is also used in English literature. It is often a good idea to mention it in text if the subject is related to Poland and concerns the polonized period. It is not required, though. (It's a little bit like the Constantinopole/Instanbul case, for example; see also WP:NCGN for some relevant reading). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 16:33, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Well, reading that, what strikes me is that if a widely accepted historic English name for a specific historical context has preference, and it should be followed by the modern English name in parentheses on the first occurrence of the name in applicable sections of the article in the format: "historical name (modern name)", then we should be using Cracow in the Montelupi article, with Cracow (Kraków) at first mention... --Andreas Philopater (talk) 22:46, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Not a bad job for your first DYK entry. Keep up the good work!--SGCM (talk) 22:59, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Sebastiano Montelupi[edit]

Symbol question.svg Hello! Your submission of Sebastiano Montelupi at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! SGCM (talk) 22:57, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Roberto Bandinelli for DYK[edit]

If you could expand it just by 50 words, it will no longer be a stub, and will be eligible for DYKing, too. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 18:04, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Busy week. No way I can do that in time. --Andreas Philopater (talk) 20:55, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Sebastiano Montelupi[edit]

Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:02, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Followup RFC to WP:RFC/AAT now in community feedback phase[edit]

Hello. As a participant in Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Abortion article titles, you may wish to register an opinion on its followup RFC, Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Abortion advocacy movement coverage, which is now in its community feedback phase. Please note that WP:RFC/AAMC is not simply a repeat of WP:RFC/AAT, and is attempting to achieve better results by asking a more narrowly-focused, policy-based question of the community. Assumptions based on the previous RFC should be discarded before participation, particularly the assumption that Wikipedia has or inherently needs to have articles covering generalized perspective on each side of abortion advocacy, and that what we are trying to do is come up with labels for that. Thanks! —chaos5023 20:25, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Roberto Bandinelli[edit]

Hi Andreas Philopater. Please, see your new baby at Template:Did you know nominations/Roberto Bandinelli. Cheers, Poeticbent talk 17:22, 25 October 2012 (UTC) Thanks Poeticbent. --Andreas Philopater (talk) 21:52, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Roberto Bandinelli[edit]

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 16:04, 29 October 2012 (UTC)


Treccani image[edit]

Hi Andreas. I saw your question in the edit summary. The image on it.wiki cannot be transferred to Commons because it's not quite free. But I believe it's "free enough" for en.wiki so you can copy the image on it.wiki and upload it on en.wiki. You should also copy the source info from it.wiki and use the template {{PD-Italy}}. I should say that while I have a solid understanding of the basic rules surrounding images on en.wiki, I'm no expert so you might want to double-check the info I just gave. Cheers, Pichpich (talk) 02:57, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

File:TheArtist (journal) cover.jpg missing description details[edit]

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 09:15, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Kraków[edit]

Just to explain my edit to the Kraków article, I want the article to provide information on how the Poles and Jews of Kraków were treated not how those two groups in general were treated. Rsloch (talk) 15:06, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Your edit does not have this effect. That the Nazis envisioned a city ethnically cleansed of Poles and Jews is hardly inconsequential to their treatment. --Andreas Philopater (talk) 15:45, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Didier Pollefeyt[edit]

Hi Andreas,

Thanks for the coomments on Didier Pollefeyt. I made some changes to the external references, adding google books, policy documents and news paper articles. The links to the sources within KULeuven are kept for the reader's convenience.

I hope this meets your expectations (I undid the banner you added). If not, please contact me.

Theology002 (talk) 07:28, 11 January 2014 (UTC)


MiG29VN[edit]

I wish to warn you about MiG29VN's behavior. He has falsely, deceptively and deviously blamed me of "vandalism" (as evidence here) and explained here (the paragraph begins with "The main reason the inclusion of the Hue Massacre "Dispute/Denial" section"'), in order to get other editors to swiftly remove content from others that he doesn't like and get editors on his side. Now he's blaming you for "vandalism". This is just to let you know what he's doing.

Thank you for your message. --Andreas Philopater (talk) 22:51, 24 April 2014 (UTC)