User talk:Andrzejbanas

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

February 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Homogenic may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:40, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Image of DVD cover[edit]

Dear user, I think the image of the DVD cover you have been repeatedly removing from the home media section of the article Toy Story 3 justifies its use in the section. Even as per the page of which you gave me the link the image justifies its place in the article. It is inserted to illustrate a section in the article entirely dedicated to the DVD. The cover art is there to illustrate the DVD, as the topic of discussion in the section. It is used just as the movie poster or the cover of the soundtrack album for the film. They too do not help the audience understand more about there object, they are just to serve as a visual identification of the object discussed. The same is the case here. If you think the image here should be removed , then remove the other two too. But that will not be appropriate. You might say that the poster serves as visual identifier of the main article subject so it justifies. But what about the soundtrack album cover? The DVD is discussed on at least as much as that if not more. Still there is a place in the soundtrack album infobox used there for the pic. As such it is allowed. The same way this image is also allowed. Anyways it does not really matter to me whether the image is present in the article or not. It will just be better if it is there. Anyways, i just hope this won't affect our relations and that we will remain friendly wahtever consensus develops over this between us. :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by King Of The Wise (talkcontribs) 17:13, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Viva la Vida[edit]

User:Flat Out undid back to dance-pop and alternative dance in the infobox, which were does not mention from any sources. Under 'Composition' section says the song being labeled as "baroque pop" and "chamber pop" from sourced, that means baroque pop as a genre. 183.171.178.239 (talk) 00:40, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

I have no view on the genre, thanks for opening up discussion. Allmusic is a good place to start looking for a reliable source. Flat Out let's discuss it 01:34, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Crimson Peak[edit]

Hey, not trying to argue, just trying to understand, but you stated that "per WP:RS,& WP:SUBJECTIVE we need third-party sources not related to the production", how is Collider not a reliable source? I've seen them used and have used them in numerous articles. And if it's a quote straight from the director, writer and producers mouth, why then not put it? LADY LOTUSTALK 12:33, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 1[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ringo Lam, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Variety (film) and Danny Lee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

An RfC that you may be interested in...[edit]

As one of the previous contributors to {{Infobox film}} or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!

This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} (tec) 18:26, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

March 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to All I Need (Air song) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • | Genre = [

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:40, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Arrow Films releases may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • publisher=All Media Network|accessdate=March 31, 2014|author=Bozzola, Lucia|title=Obsession (1976))}}</ref>
  • publisher=All Media Network|accessdate=March 31, 2014|author=Hastings, Michael|title=Pervert (2005))}}</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:12, 31 March 2014 (UTC)


Only Girl (in the World)[edit]

Can you figure it out? Entertainment Weekly says "Europop dance cut".[1] (So what do I choose, Europop or Eurodance? But it was refused.) There's Pitchfork says "an electro take on "Funkytown"-style riffing on the verses, Euro-pop catharsis everywhere else-- moves "Only Girl" into classic disco territory, which is a nice relief from modern dance pop's congested take on four-to-the-floor thump." [2] 183.171.179.244 (talk) 07:56, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Love Profusion shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
You knew very well than to edit the article more than three reverts when under discussion Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 14:52, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 20[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Glass Swords, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ecstasy and Digital download (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Summertime Sadness genre[edit]

Before reverting the article again, please consider my perspective on the song's genres. I have initiated dialogue before with you on Born to Die (Lana Del Rey album) for this precise reason. I beg of you to do me the honor again: Talk:Summertime Sadness#Genre. Clearly we feel strongly about the proper labeling of genres and Lana Del Rey. I respect that you want what is best for the article. As do I. Thank you. --Thevampireashlee (talk) 03:00, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Stop icon Your addition to Burning Paradise has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:46, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 29[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Black Sabbath (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Galatea (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Eclipsefilmposter.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Eclipsefilmposter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. James086Talk 05:18, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Gamera2.jpg)[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading File:Gamera2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 15:42, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 5[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of Italian films of 1963 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Richard Harrison, Frank Wolff, Richard Lloyd, Sean Flynn, Joe Robinson and Tony Kendall
Aphex Twin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Derrick May
Black Sabbath (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Twitch

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:La ragazza di Bube.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:La ragazza di Bube.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:05, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

E.T.[edit]

Hey, I saw there was an issue with the genre for "E.T.". Just for clarification, the Billboard sources says:

Anokute reteamed Perry with serial hitmakers Lukasz "Dr. Luke" Gottwald and Max Martin, who made sure "Teenage Dream" bounced as much as rocked. "Katy definitely knows what she wants and doesn't want," says Gottwald, whose five credited songs include "Gurls," "Teenage Dream" and the celestial hip-hop track "E.T.," which he'd originally intended for Three 6 Mafia. "She has an amazing voice, great taste and she makes great videos. It's nice to work with an artist who can deliver your music so well."

Taken from [3]. Hope this helps solved this little misunderstanding :) Giacobbe talk 15:20, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Stars Dance[edit]

Just for clarification, Allmusic reviewer does not mention the album is electronic, then electronic which came from genre sidebar. 183.171.176.158 (talk) 03:25, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The-Ghost-1963-poster.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The-Ghost-1963-poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 21:47, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Scott Pilgrim[edit]

I completely see where you're coming from with your revert, don't get me wrong. However, BFI is an extremely reliable source when it comes to a film's nationality, and it's not like they just make things up, especially considering that the infobox film template says:

I understand, Dentsu isn't a major company involved with the filming. But if BFI lists it as a co-production of the UK, the U.S., and Japan, that should be reflected. For instanced, FA Dredd is listed as being "a South African/British co-production". However, its production companies are British, American, and Indian. This is because the film itself states that it is a production of the United Kingdom and South Africa (where filming occurred).

Basically, the fact that BFI calls the film a co-production of those countries makes it a very reliable source saying that's so. Corvoe (speak to me) 16:29, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Black Sabbath[edit]

You're welcome - I do a lot of copy-editing! Eugene-elgato (talk) 18:33, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Red Lights (song)[edit]

Can you removed genre with unreliable sources that JayJ47 added? Thanks.

P.S. If User:JayJ47 did it again with unreliable sources. 183.171.179.230 (talk) 15:43, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Genres in Music Articles[edit]

hi. Can you suggest what sources are best for verifying the genres of songs? It's not very helpful if editors keep removing genres without suggesting which sources are best to back-up the genres of songs. Also, this need to reference the genres of songs seems to be a relatively recent development on wikipedia, so if this is the case, you or someone else should make this known in the article guidelines for record charts and also provide examples of what references can be used to verify the genres of songs. JayJ47 (talk) 04:15, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 16[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of comedy films of the 2010s, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Nelson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Unconditionally[edit]

It was User:Lil-unique1's fault, it's not fair. He added electronic music in the infobox that he told the introduction is electronic, which it says "minimalist electronic production", but I think electronic music is not the song's genre because is talking about production, and Muumuse is a blog (where it says power pop), and electronic dance music has no citation. 183.171.179.107 (talk) 15:23, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Hercules, Samson and Ulysses.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hercules, Samson and Ulysses.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:07, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 25[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hello Kitty (Avril Lavigne song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:48, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Butterfly (Crazy Town song)[edit]

Hi there! Why bother reverting the sample info about Butterfly (Crazy Town song) when it'd take just as long to Google a source? Wouldn't it at least be better to use the Template:Citation needed? --Mathias-90 (talk) 09:15, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Scaruffi source[edit]

The consensus of January is no more. There's a new discussion. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Albums#Piero_Scaruffi_as_a_reliable_and_published_source Could you write your point of view? Thanks Woovee (talk) 16:45, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 7[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of adventure films of the 2010s, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Alan Taylor and Richard Armitage (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Circle of Life[edit]

I remove unsourced genres but semi-protection on it. 183.171.177.241 (talk) 07:29, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Recess (song)[edit]

Can you reach it through semi-protection? I just found out the source is incorrect, it says other songs' genre 183.171.178.202 (talk) 13:38, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Revert of Harlan Ellison quote[edit]

@Andrzejbanas:I don't want to get into an editing war, so I will state may case and if you disagree, you won't hear another peep about it. I think the exact quote is essential, since it states exactly what is in the film as "credit". there is no "based on" as some people claim, or any mention of specific works. And yes the quote is not in the cited source, I thought the statement makes it clear that it is in the film and the film is considered a primary source and thus can be quoted with not other citation required. Anyway, if you change your mind, re-add it, otherwise it will stay as is. Take care!AbramTerger (talk) 22:48, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

@Andrzejbanas: But my point remains that it IS cited. It is explicitly written and displayed within the film. The film is a Primary source and can be referenced without any need of further citation. That quote is in all current copies of the film, whether on DVD, VHS, Blu-Ray or even remastered in Theaters. The quote was put in the movie while it was still in theaters. I recall seeing it at the end of the film when I first saw the film.AbramTerger (talk) 23:03, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Pure Heroine[edit]

Why, hello there! My name is Tristessa, your friendly neighbourhood mediator from the Mediation Committee. I promise that I don't bite! I'll be the mediator handling your dispute over the categorisation of the Pure Heroine article. I've asked all of you a question about the article on the Mediation Committee case page, and I'd be really grateful if you'd come along and have a chat with me about it, at the following page:

Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Pure Heroine

Please do remember that mediation is completely voluntary and, if at any time you don't want to participate further, you can stop being involved. My job is to help you to be able to solve this together, however, and I hope you'll talk to me if you need to. I look forward to your participation. Thanks, --Tristessa (talk) 21:16, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Contested PROD[edit]

An article you PRODed, was contested post deletion and restored as "objected PROD" - Synthwave  Ronhjones  (Talk) 18:59, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

"Pretty Little Ditty" mention on "Butterfly" page[edit]

Hi, you recently reverted my edit to Butterfly (Crazy Town song) which added a reference to "Pretty Little Ditty" in connection with a critic's quote. Your edit bore the note "not mentioned in the source". If you read the source carefully, you will see that the critic did in fact link directly to "Pretty Little Ditty" over the text "the song where it came from". Furthermore, the current excerpt makes little sense, since it refers to a specific song but does not identify that song - hence my addition. The original source makes the referenced song clear via hyperlink, but the current state of the article does not preserve this meaning, and therefore needs to be corrected.

Please read sources closely before reverting changes on these grounds. Out of respect for your good faith, I will not revert your own reversion, and would welcome your input on the article talk page before I re-add the missing information from that source. Jerodast (talk) 22:06, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Mediation Committee notification[edit]

MedCom laurel.png

Dear Andrzejbanas: I'm writing to you regarding a Mediation Committee case that you are involved in, or have some connection with, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Pure Heroine. I've received no reply from any mediation parties to my message dated 23:19, 26 May 2014. Could you please review what I've written at the case talk page, and respond if you wish to? If you have any questions or concerns relating to this dispute or this mediation, please do let me know. Thank you very much. Best regards, Tristessa (talk) 02:35, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

THE DARK KNIGHT[edit]

Hello, I'm WARNER one, I notice you recently made a change to THE DARK KNIGHT, ignoring brackets <..! !...> with DO NOT in it. Don't worry I restored it for you. Please read in future. Thank you, WARNER one 9999

Sorry it was meant to say do not change to American-British 9999 — Preceding unsigned comment added by WARNER one (talkcontribs) 17:49, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Comment on FLC[edit]

Hello Andrzejbanas. Do you have some spare time to review List of thrash metal bands, a feature list candidate of mine? You can leave comments or vote at the review page. Kind regards.--Retrohead (talk) 20:12, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Me again. I don't mean to bother you, but can you at least tell me whether you intend to review the list, or should I seek comments from someone else. Thank you.--Retrohead (talk) 13:45, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Garbage album genres edit[edit]

Please do not remove the genres again. As I stated in the edit summary, the album is independent and officially uses indie rock guitars (something stated by the band themselves), and songs like Milk, Queer, A Stroke of Luck incorporate downtempo. If you're not familiar with these genres then familiarize yourself, but don't remove them. Lapadite77 (talk) 15:18, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Quit removing the genres. Subgenres that are part of the main, official genres do not need a source, and both indie rock and downtempo elements are blatantly incorporated in the album. The album page itself (& Milk and Queer pages) states trip hop (derivative of downtempo), and in case you don't know, indie rock is derivative/a sub genre of alt rock. Again, blatantly obvious the album incorporates indie rock and it was stated by the band themselves. Remember you are not the arbitrator here. If you have a problem with the genres being included, discuss it the talk page (where consensus can be reached) or take it up with administrator (which I will if you engage in edit war)- don't just repeatedly revert edits. Lpdte77 15:45, 24 June 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lapadite77 (talkcontribs)
You're now rummaging through the band's pages, deleting things as you please? --Lpdte77 (talk) 16:51, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Garbage (album) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Lpdte77 (talk) 00:30, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

File:2019-after-the-fall-of-new-york.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:2019-after-the-fall-of-new-york.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Green Giant (talk) 17:16, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:2019afterfallnewyork.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:2019afterfallnewyork.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:08, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

June 2014 warning[edit]

Information icon Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you.

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Button sig.png) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --Lpdte77 (talk) 19:16, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

June 29[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from changing or reverting genres without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. --Lpdte77 (talk) 01:43, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Native (album)[edit]

Can you edit with the album's genre as said on 'Critical reception' section? 183.171.164.178 (talk) 03:51, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Fantstic-planet-poster.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fantstic-planet-poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:52, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

West Coast (song)[edit]

I'm not sure that the song is pop or not. Billboard says "a fragile pop chorus" that is a part, not a whole track. 183.171.167.168 (talk) 16:03, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Chaos AD[edit]

It's not fucking death metal. It's groove metal. Listen to the album. Listen to Altars of Madness. Hear the difference. I've cited an article. Stop fucking changing the genre. Thanks. 82.109.233.82 (talk) 12:00, 03 July 2014 (GMT)

Disambiguation link notification for July 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of action films of the 2010s, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Edge of Tomorrow. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:BlackSampson.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:BlackSampson.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 23:10, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Fantstic-planet-poster.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fantstic-planet-poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:31, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Clarity[edit]

Please refrain from changing music genres, as you did to Clarity, without providing a source, and without establishing a consensus on the article's talk page. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive, and you could be indefinitely blocked. 23:17, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 12[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of comedy films of the 2010s, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mike Smith and Christopher Miller. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

July 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kung Fu Hustle may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • br/>China<ref>{{cite web|url=http://explore.bfi.org.uk/4ce2b8ab78dea|work=British Film Institute]]|title=Gong Fu|accessdate=July 12, 2014}}</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:41, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Lamberto Bava may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • ' with his father and in 1980 directed his first solo feature film ''Macabre (1980 film)|Macabre]]''.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:01, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 15 July[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:32, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Elviramistressofthedarkposter.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Elviramistressofthedarkposter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:30, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 19[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aces Go Places 3, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Raymond Wong. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Rude Boy (Rihanna song)[edit]

I removed unreliable source, but User:Calvin999 reverted it. I think should check every section. 183.171.162.115 (talk) 16:39, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

I reverted your removal of the genres from the lead. I didn't see the unreliable source in the info box, that was clearly added before.  — ₳aron 11:27, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Lamberto Bava[edit]

I understand you're frustrated with that IP, but leaving edit summaries and giving warnings is very useful for administrators. Thank you. 207.157.121.52 (talk) 18:16, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 2[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of comedy films of the 2010s, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Steven Brill, David Cho and Xiao Yang. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

August 2014[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Dogmaticeclectic. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Atomic Betty, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Did you even read the sources in question? Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 16:18, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Your revert[edit]

Your revert has confused me, seeing as you were the person to remove pop from the genre field in the first place. Secondly, Entertainment Weekly categorises albums rather crassly; as seen with Beyoncé which, if we used their source, would be nothing but a pop album, which it certainly isn't. I'd say there was one pop song on 4, yet almost every track is R&B in some respect. —JennKR | 21:26, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 9[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Advance (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Post (album). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Lukejordan02 (talk) 12:36, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Lukejordan02 (talk) 17:39, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Unblock request[edit]

File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Andrzejbanas (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblock)


Request reason:

Hello. I was blocked after a Three revert rule. A was trying to suggest to a user that even material unsourced should be removed and it's up for them to find info before re-adding it. I didn't realize the shortcut of WP:BURDEN. I'd like to discuss it with them further so we can edit wikipedia better. I'll avoid editing the said article that caused my block in the first place. (outside it's talk page in case anyone wants to chime in with an opinion.)

Outside that, I have to Good Article's nominated. In case someone chooses to review them during this period, I'd be unable to respond via the block. I'd like to be able to contribute. I think my edit record shows I don't vandalize indiscriminately and try to civil with users. Either way. If it stands it stands. I'm good either way!

Quick edit: I'd also like to undo stuff like this [4]. It drives me mental! ;)

Decline reason:

To be honest, my concern with unblocking you early, is that this was tried before, and since then you've got blocked for edit warring. PhilKnight (talk) 21:03, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first and then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page for as long as you are blocked.

Uninvolved comment I just came across this while browsing the noticeboard and I'd like to note that this is his third block, and he's the one that actually breached 3RR. While the other editor got a two week block, he received 48 hours (which I found unfair and have left a note for the blocking admin). Dusti*Let's talk!* 18:48, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
Hey Dusti. Fair enough. I honestly thought he did fourth first btw. I guess I was too quick on the trigger. I was trying to communicate him via his talk page and the article's talk page with no luck. Oh well, edit under fire and I'm going to get burned. Andrzejbanas (talk) 18:51, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
Hey Dusti I just saw this edit, how uninvolved are you? Andrzejbanas (talk) 18:55, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
Entirely uninvolved. Notice that I've not edited the page at all, nor was I involved with the discussion at 3RR (I've recently interacted with the user and gave them guidance on the ANI noticeboard). Dusti*Let's talk!* 18:59, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Andrzejbanas, as you've already put the unblock request before I could place the block notice, I presume you're aware of the procedure. I shall clarify that the reason Luke got a 2 week block was because he has already been blocked for 2 weeks earlier this year. I had an option of blocking Luke for a month, but decided against it as the previous time, Luke had taken some kind of corrective measure - ergo the two weeks block for Luke this time to prevent continued disruption. In your case, if your previous block would have been two weeks, I would have increased the same to a month, again to prevent disruption as both you and Luke should have known better, given that both of you have already been blocked recently. Noticing that you've had a block of 24 hours in the recent past, and still do not seem to realise the gravity of breaking 3RR, I've given you a 48 hour block. Do note that I've not yet considered your edit warring on any other articles. My suggestion to you would be to read up on our 3RR and edit warring policies extremely well in the coming two days, so that in the future, you do not disrupt the project even by mistake. Take care. Wifione Message 19:17, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi Dusti. I accept that you were uninvolved but could you please give us a direct link to the conversation an ANI. I looked for it but am running out of time to continue the search. I ask because Luke had previous guidance here User talk:Ponyo/Archive 22#Sorry.2Fand a question and here and I just want to be able to see your attempt to aid Luke. Please note that Ponyo's reason for the unblock back in June states "I have unblocked your account based on our conversation below and your expressed commitment to gain consensus for your edits as opposed to reverting in the future." Luke made no attempt whatsoever to gain consensus in the current situation. Now I am not saying that Andrzejbanas' hands (er I mean typing fingers) are clean in this and I wish that the edit warring had not occurred. Thanks to you both for your time and I will understand if you do not wish to reply Dusti. MarnetteD|Talk 19:25, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
@MarnetteD: the thread is located here. Dusti*Let's talk!* 19:28, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
Thanks Dusti. I appreciate your finding that for me. Cheers. MarnetteD|Talk 19:36, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
man didn't realize this would be such a production. Hi Wifione, I have to admit I'm pretty unfamiliar with the unblocking procedure as a) i've been blocked only once before I believe, and even though I've been editing with people for about oh...8 years? I've usually dealt with people via comments or the talk page. Anyways, I'd still like to stress the predominate reason I'm requesting unblock was not because "I didn't do anything!", it's more about edits like that article I mentioned above and also about those two GA's which I'm still fine tuning and would like to be there in case some one edits it. I can leave those other articles alone in the mean time. Andrzejbanas (talk) 20:00, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi A. You may want to ping Wifone in case they haven't put your talk page on their watchlist. Whatever happens hang in there and I do appreciate all the work you do here at WikiP. Cheers. MarnetteD|Talk 20:12, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
Right. I keep seeing that feature and forgetting to, y'know. learn it. Apparently I can't thank people when I'm blocked Marnette. But imagine this is text has a been green smile face and speech saying "Thanks!" near it. Andrzejbanas (talk) 20:26, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
Here you go Andrze, it's {{ping|username}}. I'll go ahead and ping @Wifione: for you. Dusti*Let's talk!* 20:34, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
Thanks @Dusti:! Don't we need a third party mod or something to come in and look at this then? I think that's what happens.Andrzejbanas (talk) 20:51, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
No worries. I'll just cross my fingers that no one edits the GA noms. Thanks though @PhilKnight:. Andrzejbanas (talk) 21:05, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi Andrze, I appreciate your responses. I'm not ready to remove the block given that your understanding of edit warring and 3RR post the past block should have been extremely clear. I'm not sure whether you still understand 3RR and edit warring, and therefore fear continued disruption. Have you given the pages I linked to a good read? My suggestion remains the same. Take the time out to read up our policy pages. Your depth of editing has to be combined with the understanding of our guidelines and policies. Please ensure that you give a statement clearly while your block is played out that you've read and completely understood what is edit warring and the consequences of edit warring. Once you resume editing, please note that these words would be held up to you to remind you of your editing deportment in the future. Take care and best. Wifione Message 04:06, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi @Wifione:, I'll give it a good read. No worries, I have other projects I can work on. I try to stay away from wiki at the moment cause my watchlist is driving me nuts. ;) I'll re-read it once I'm back in though! Andrzejbanas (talk) 10:50, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
A, do you have any Criterion Collection DVDs to catch up on? I picked up Red River the last time B&N had their half price sale (along with The Throne of Blood and a couple others) and I still haven't had time to get to it. Enjoy your time and Best Regards to you. MarnetteD|Talk 10:57, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Criterion[edit]

@MarnetteD:, tons! I received a nice gift of the Jacques Demy set which has a lot of good information and great transfers all film except Lola which is about as bad as Criterion's 1998 dvd for Branded to Kill. I also one a big on ebay for To Be or Not To Be which I'm looking forward to getting around too. It's just a matter of taking the time to watch 'em and their bonus features. I've also got a regionless player so I've been able to get blu rays from the Masters of Cinema, BFI and Arrow Video as well. Might watch something tonight. Too bad I can't even edit a sandbox under the ban, would be good to make notes on. Andrzejbanas (talk) 12:50, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply. To Be or Not To Be is a treat. Having only seen the codified Jack Benny persona as a youngster it was a delight to see how talented he was before that. Region free is the way to go. I have been a UK TV addict since I was a kid watching The Avengers and The Prisoner and my RF player has allowed me to more than double my DVD collection. I have found numerous sets that were less expensive (even including the shipping!) to buy from Amazon UK than from Amazon US. I got a very nice set of Werner Herzog's early films on blu ray recently and that is filling up my time at the moment. They will go to the sidelines tomorrow though as the anticipation of new Doctor Who episodes takes over. Having been a fan of Peter Capaldi since Local Hero back in the early 80s I am looking forward to his take on the role. Cheers again. MarnetteD|Talk 13:01, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
@MarnetteD:, I'd really like to see some of those. I'm not as crazy about tv items as I find most of them aren't as strong or having as big as ideas as films do. The only shows I've picked up to really enjoy was the new Twin Peaks blu ray and Top of the Lake. Both are by film makers which probably comes as no coincidence either. The Herzog set is also impressive but I really need to watch my pennies as of late. At least I have a good amount of product to catch up on. Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:05, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
I sure do know what you are talking about when it comes to budgets. The WH set was my birthday present to myself but getting it has lead to watching my pennies for the next month or two. Have fun!! MarnetteD|Talk 13:14, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Fresh start[edit]

Hi, I just want to say I want to forget all of the previous crap and move on, I apologise for all the wrongdoings I did and appreciate you as an editor and for all of the contributions and good you have done for wiki, kind regards. Lukejordan02 (talk) 22:00, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 24[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of crime films of the 2010s, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Gareth Evans and Frank Miller. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Black Sabbath (film)[edit]

Hello, obviously you know this film better than I. So I cannot help but accept to stand corrected. Still I think that the quoted book by Howard Hughes is an overwhelmingly reliable reference and thus worth being mentioned. At least the film being in this book shows once more that this film has cultural significance. I take it now the set wasn't simply used again but once dismantled and then rebuilt. Maybe Hughes meant just the design was used again. Anyway, if something isn't unequivocal it doesn't belong into a proper Wikipedia article, right you are. Nordhorner II (talk)I am not a number! I am a Nordhorner. 08:34, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi @NordhornerII:! I'll see if I can take a second look at the commentary, but Lucas (who is probably the biggest Bava expert around) says it resembles it, but it's not the same one. Even with my eyes, I thought it was the same too. I'll see if I can double check that commentary tonight, because I don't want to leave out info.

Glad someone is as interested in Bava as I am to even bother to add sourced material. The only edits I end up making to that article are people changing the plot to match the AIP version on Netflix. :) Andrzejbanas (talk) 11:59, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

LTA report on a long-term vandal[edit]

I noticed that you've fought vandalism on Hong Kong films, so I figured I would alert you to Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Martial arts vandal, which may help you. One thing that I've found helpful is to wait until the vandal gets blocked, and then revert his edits. Otherwise, he'll edit war endlessly with you. I've been submitting reports to the appropriate noticeboards as soon as I see him, so it usually only takes an hour or two before he's got another lengthy block. Unfortunately, he does return rather quickly under new IP addresses. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:39, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Season of the Witch (1973 film), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Belle du Jour, McFarland and Anchor Bay. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Barnstar of Reversion Hires.png The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thanks for helping with the Martial Arts Film Vandal recently. ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 15:26, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
haha. Thank you! Andrzejbanas (talk) 16:43, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

September 2014[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Atomic Betty. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 18:01, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Enough is enough[edit]

Stop vandalizing the article Atomic Betty. You've repeatedly added back a citation that is essentially spam as it provides no information of use to the article whatsoever, in addition to making other questionable changes. Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 18:04, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

I would agree with the Science Fiction genre per the citation that he's providing. I don't see it being spam, as you can see on the left hand corner they're classifying it as Science Fiction. Now, the removal of genres is something entirely different, though they're unsourced. Dusti*Let's talk!* 18:29, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
Note that this discussion has now moved to the article's talk page. Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 18:37, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 17[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of horror films of 2014, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Douglas Smith. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Dynamic IP addresses[edit]

Hi Andrzejbanas,, I've deleted the SPI you submitted at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/90.221.151.47 as the IP address in the range are dynamic which means they change without the person using them being able to prevent it. You can sometimes find this out by going to the IP's contributions page then clicking on "Geolocate" at the bottom, sometimes a guess of whether they are static or dynamic is listed as well as the company which owns the IPs. I have merged it into Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/90.200.85.232. Regards, Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 00:45, 21 September 2014 (UTC)