User talk:Angeldeb82

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome!

Hello, Angeldeb82, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --Kf4bdy 04:31, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

huhhh?[edit]

WHY YOU WANT TO PUT PICHURE THAT DON'T EXIST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1205.250.5.46 18:08, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Are you crazy? I never said I wanted a picture that doesn't exist! Do I look like a nut to you? --Angeldeb82 19:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:DPJackandMaddie.png)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:DPJackandMaddie.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 16:38, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:SaddamGrave.jpg[edit]

Nuvola apps important.svg

Thanks for uploading Image:SaddamGrave.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 03:23, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Okay, I've copied the Fair Use Rationale explanations from Image talk:SaddamGrave.jpg and put it onto its image description page, so do you think it's okay if I delete the warning template? --Angeldeb82 04:05, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:SaddamGrave.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:SaddamGrave.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 20:01, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

That's okay. I couldn't save the picture because it was from Reuters, and Wikipedia does not accept images like that one as Fair Use. Besides, I gave a message for people working on the Saddam Hussein article to find me a picture of Saddam's grave that is similar to the one that is about to be deleted, only public domain this time. I hope you will forgive me. --Angeldeb82 00:46, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Find-a-Grave[edit]

This from the forum section: The board is currently closed while we perform some routine maintenance. Rklawton 03:19, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Good, because now it's finally updated. --Angeldeb82 18:09, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Dear Angeldeb82, thanks for the work on William Corder at find a grave. As a person that has seen the display about the red barn murder I think the word 'remains' might give the wrong impression. The museum has a copy of the Curtis book bound in his skin and a part of his scalp. Up to you if you want to change the entry just thought I would let you know. Thanks Edmund Patrick ( confer work) 20:35, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Okay, I've changed the bio entry for that matter, because, after all, his scalp and a book bound in his skin are a part of his remains. --Angeldeb82 (talk) 20:27, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

October 2[edit]

Yes check.svg Done. I've warned the new vandal. Unfortunately, you can't get a block on the first offence, which is the case here. Users must have an only warning or a last warning, or, for registered users, have made enough vandalism edits (usually >5) to be considered a vandalism only account, to be blocked. NF24(radio me!Editor review) 14:00, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Birthdate of Elisabeth of Hungary[edit]

Hi Angeldeb,

You had asked me about my source for Elisabeth of Hungary's birthdate of July 7, 1207. First a little background. My parents are German immigrants to the US. My ancestors lived in Marburg and I went to university there for a year. I have studied Elisabeth for many years, as my mother's family claims to be descended from her through Margarethe, an illegitimate daughter of Landgrave William II of Hesse. (Don't know if that's true, though!) I was fortunate enough to be in Marburg in April 2007 when the preparations for Elisabeth Year were gearing up, and there were many exhibits and banners throughout the town which listed her birthdate. She was a royal child, so records were kept of the birth, and it was especially noted that the date was a "triple seven" -- 7/7/1207 -- so it was easy to remember. Hope this helps! Let me know if you have other questions. Haddison (talk) 21:26, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

VG Ratings[edit]

Hey, saw you adding info to the {{VG Ratings}} templates on several Phoenix Wright articles. Could you possibly use {{Cite web}} instead of linking via [these tags]? Cite web templates are preferred and easier to navigate. Thanks. NOCTURNENOIR ( t • c ) 04:18, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. I'm gonna have to try when I get a chance, okay? --Angeldeb82 (talk) 04:22, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Yep. Thanks for your hard work! NOCTURNENOIR ( t • c ) 04:24, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Try taking a look at User:Mr.Z-man/refToolbar, which has helped me use the {{cite web}}. It's a really useful script. NOCTURNENOIR ( t • c ) 04:32, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, I took a look at that one. Unfortunately, there is no "Cite web" button anywhere on the "edit section". This stinks. :( --Angeldeb82 (talk) 04:45, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Take a look at the script I linked. That should add a icon to your editing toolbar (even if you access edits through "Edit Section." It will display {{Cite}}, but upon clicking it, the option to cite web, book, journal, etc, will appear in the form of buttons. Hope this helps! NOCTURNENOIR ( t • c ) 04:51, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Heya, just another quick message... I talked to a few users from WP:VG and they have tended to agree that each Reception section should have around 10 of the most well-known reviews instead of having loads of loads of reviews. Additionally, most WP:FA and WP:GA articles in the Video Games section run around 10 reviews. I have therefore begun to remove some of the reviews that you added. Just wanted to let you know! NOCTURNENOIR ( t • c )

Hello :)[edit]

Err... apparently you don't know how to revert edits. You can found out how to do it by clicking on the link (revert), but I suppose I can tell you how normally: At the top of the page, near the "EDIT" button there is a "HISTORY". Click on that, you can go back and foward edits via those arrows (they are labled), and there is a thingy near the edit summary (in italics) that says (undo). Click on it and it'll set an edit page to what the page was like before that edit was made, and then you can "Save Changes" and revert it.

Help at all? :)--156.3.74.84 (talk) 20:42, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

[edit]

See the "There is a problem with the image storage. We are in the process of fixing it." right below the tabs, and also http://techblog.wikimedia.org/ . Please note that Talk:Wikipedia should only be used to discuss Wikipedia's article about itself; it's not for discussion about Wikipedia generally. --Cybercobra (talk) 03:04, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

October 2009[edit]

Information.svg Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Windows Update are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Logan | Talk 23:25, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

You can't trust Wikipedia ya'know  ;-)[edit]

Way back in 2007 you changed a date in the article Hanging. And way? Because you checked the article Adolf Eichmann at that time and it said "June 1".

And the change from "May 31" to "June 1" was made by an administrator (!), back in 14 March 2007, just a couple days before you copied that date.

Why did they make Jmlk17 make that change? Well, I'm not sure, and can't ask as Jmlk17 is 'gone'. The article's archives have some discussion back and forth in 2004. But it really would have been nice for Jmlk17 to include an "edit summary" explaining why.

Not to worry, as both articles have been changed back since, and I was just tracking down odd changes. But it is a good example where 'we' have to know when to trust and when to check... Oh, and how important edit summaries are.  ;-) Shenme (talk) 04:31, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

I didn't know that an admin made the wrong change. But anyway, I'm glad you told me.  :) --Angeldeb82 (talk) 15:52, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

ABC and CPR[edit]

Hi there,

just thought i'd give you a direct response as you posted the same request on a few article talk pages. The switch to doing compressions first has been international standard for several years now, but this is only performed on a patient who isn't breathing and you therefore need to open the airway and check breathing before starting. In the ABC article you can see this mentioned, as it is frequently taught as (check) Airway, (check) Breathing, (do) Compressions.

Hope that helps clarify! Any questions, give me a shout.

Regards, OwainDavies (about)(talk) edited at 06:47, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

re:TMI[edit]

Ok, I'll break down the reason for the revert. The over-riding reason is that articles on fiction on Wikipedia shouldn't focus on the minutae of a character and shouldn't stray off topic. They should instead cover the fictional plot details as concisely as possible while maintaining a grip on the real-world parts of the character. For writing directly on plot, this means don't use 10 words when 1 will suffice: cut out the excess stuff and grab what is really relevant. You might benefit from reading over WP:WAF. Remember, these articles should be written as though for an audience entirely unfamiliar with the topic. Ultimately, this article, unlike most of the other Monkey Island articles, has been assessed by the community and classed as a good article, and needs to maintain that standard to keep that status.

1) La Esponja Grande and Feast of the Senses are entirely unexplained terms, they haven't been mentioned in the article before and are just thrown in without context. The general reader won't have a clue what is meant by these terms, and it would be straying off topic to have to go and explain them. It's far better to not refer to them directly at this level of plot detail, rather just talking about a generic "cure for the pox".
2) Noting all the changes Guybrush goes through also strays offtopic from Elaine's character and adds unnecessary fluff to the article. All that is needed is acknowledgement that Guybrush has returned from the dead; the exact nature of that is not pertinent here. Perhaps seeking a more generic word that covers being both a ghost and a zombie is needed, but expanding it to explain Guybrush's undead adventures isn't needed.
3) Elaine's change in clothing is trivial at best.
4) Morgan's role can be glossed over in favour of the more indepth explanation already in the main Tales of Monkey Island article. Elaine's role is the only one relevant on this page. Morgan is only mentioned once before in the article, and having to explain her predicament would be adding more off-topic stuff.

-- Sabre (talk) 18:18, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

Christina Marie Riggs[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Angeldeb82. You have new messages at Joseph A. Spadaro's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Angeldeb82. You have new messages at Joseph A. Spadaro's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

To: User talk:Angeldeb82. Hello. I was just wondering why you feel that Christina Marie Riggs's death date is uncertain or unclear? The official web site for the State of Arkansas lists the execution date as May 2, 2000. This is the link to their website ([1]). Other sources also list May 2. Why do you think that it might be May 3? Is there something that I am missing? Please reply at my Talk Page. Thanks. (Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 21:40, 5 May 2011 (UTC))

Well, NCADP's website said it was May 3, so did the Death Penalty Information Center, and so did the newspaper on the Google Website (the top corner of the newspaper said "Tuesday, May 2, 2000", while the article on her said she was to be executed "tomorrow" (i.e., May 3)). They have to be right when they said "May 3". --Angeldeb82 (talk) 21:58, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi. Thanks! But, I disagree with your statement that "they have to be right". The best source we have is the State of Arkansas Department of Prisons — the government agency that actually carried out the execution. How could they be wrong? Now, they may have a typo in their official website, but that's unlikely. They are a credible source for their own official actions ... and, in fact, they are the original source ... and, thus, the best source. Thanks! (Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 22:03, 5 May 2011 (UTC))
I read all of your sources. The first two sources are probably just copying off of each other. (The wording was an exact replication ... and I think that those two organizations are actually the same group?) So, if there was an error in one report, it would simply carry over into the other. The third source (newspaper article) seems odd, though. I will call the State of Arkansas Prison Department and/or Attorney General ... and see what they can tell me. I can only assume that someone in the State government there must have some official knowledge about this ... especially considering that it was such an important event. I will let you know what I find out. Thanks! (Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 22:11, 5 May 2011 (UTC))
Hi. Sorry for the very, very late reply. I actually did call the Arkansas prison system, and I spoke with their public information spokeswoman. She confirmed that the death date was indeed May 2, 2000. Thanks! Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 22:08, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Jeanne Jugan[edit]

Take your pick: Catholic encyclopedia says 15 May, 1793. And all of these say 1793 anyway. I will not bother to debate this. Take it easy Angel. Cheers. History2007 (talk) 15:06, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Józef Cebula[edit]

Thank you for that interesting article. If you were to expand it a little and add inline citations (see WP:CITE), the article would qualify for front page exposure at T:TDYK. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 21:36, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

looks like you fixed one of my citations[edit]

just wanted to say thanks :) Elinruby (talk) 04:28, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

You're welcome. And it was my pleasure. --Angeldeb82 (talk) 04:35, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

FYI - SOPA news you posted was moved[edit]

Just letting you know (I had nothing to do with it) this move was done. -- Seth Finkelstein (talk) 23:51, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Downward Spiral edit[edit]

I reverted your edit to this article. Per WP:Albums/Ratings template, no more than 10 reviews should be included in the ratings template. Dan56 (talk) 03:59, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 12[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Castlevania: Symphony of the Night, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 1UP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Firefox article needs you![edit]

Your edits have been dearly missed at the Firefox article. Come back! Thanks! ҭᴙᴇᴡӌӌ 00:25, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

I appreciate your contributions to the various Firefox articles and templates - your tireless efforts at keeping up are welcomed! --Wrldwzrd89talk 11:01, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

AfD discussion[edit]

Hi. Would you like to comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indie hip hop? Dan56 (talk) 04:59, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Please don't. Dan56 is canvassing. Arcandam (talk) 06:07, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

R.E.M. edits[edit]

Thanks You've fixed up so many references in these articles—it's really great. —Justin (koavf)TCM 10:02, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

You're welcome, Justin. It was my pleasure.  :) --Angeldeb82 (talk) 16:05, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
Collaborating Let me know if you ever want to work together to improve some articles related to R.E.M. or albums. —Justin (koavf)TCM 04:00, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Sputnik[edit]

Note that Sputnik user reviews should not go on the article, they are non professional, see: Wikipedia:WikiProject_Albums/Review_sites, only staff and emeritus reviews should be put in articles. I have removed the user reviews you added to As the Palaces Burn and Ashes of the Wake. The1337gamer (talk) 06:54, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

I see. Well, thanks anyway. --Angeldeb82 (talk) 16:45, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Java (software platform)[edit]

Sorry, but, what is your source for date release for java se? (Your changing my edit from 28-Nov-2012 to 12-Dec-2012, ok, i don't found any date stamp in the official-download-webpage, so I used the date of the digital signature of the package jre-7u10-windows-i586.exe that I downloaded. I am curious).

EmpatojayosBrand (talk) ??:??, 20 December 2012 (UTC) (manual edit -> I forgot my password) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.106.104.103 (talk)

Cruel Summer[edit]

Hi. Could you comment at this talk page regarding the article Cruel Summer (GOOD Music album)? It concerns attributing an album's proper artist and title/name, as there are somewhat conflicting sources. Dan56 (talk) 02:42, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

GAN review[edit]

Hi. Would you be interested in reviewing my GAN for Song of Innocence? It's been sitting around for a month, and I'd like to nominate it for FA when it passes. If not, no need to reply back. Dan56 (talk) 22:42, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

tmbg refs[edit]

hi! i just wanted to say thanks for sprucing up/adding a lot of the reviews listed on articles for They Might Be Giants releases! i feel sort of silly personally "thanking" you for contributing to wikipedia, since it's for everybody, but seeing other people edit articles about TMBG things in such substantial way is kind of exciting to me! i've been kind of completely re-writing or expanding a lot of the album pages, but since i'm still learning the ropes around wikipedia i probably make lots of small errors and it bums me out that no one's bothered to catch them thus far! sorry if this sounds strange or haughty or something! i am being genuine even though sometimes i don't sound that way on the Internet! ~ Boomur [talk] 04:16, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

You're very welcome. Besides, it was my pleasure. --Angeldeb82 (talk) 14:59, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

May 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to It's Blitz! may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:18, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Yep, I fixed it. Thanks for the info. --Angeldeb82 (talk) 19:08, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 19[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Low End Theory, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Source (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 22:54, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 5[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mr Love & Justice, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Workers Playtime (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Hey Angeldeb82

I'm sending you this because you've made quite a few edits to the template namespace in the past couple of months. If I've got this wrong, or if I haven't but you're not interested in my request, don't worry; this is the only notice I'm sending out on the subject :).

So, as you know (or should know - we sent out a centralnotice and several watchlist notices) we're planning to deploy the VisualEditor on Monday, 1 July, as the default editor. For those of us who prefer markup editing, fear not; we'll still be able to use the markup editor, which isn't going anywhere.

What's important here, though, is that the VisualEditor features an interactive template inspector; you click an icon on a template and it shows you the parameters, the contents of those fields, and human-readable parameter names, along with descriptions of what each parameter does. Personally, I find this pretty awesome, and from Monday it's going to be heavily used, since, as said, the VisualEditor will become the default.

The thing that generates the human-readable names and descriptions is a small JSON data structure, loaded through an extension called TemplateData. I'm reaching out to you in the hopes that you'd be willing and able to put some time into adding TemplateData to high-profile templates. It's pretty easy to understand (heck, if I can write it, anyone can) and you can find a guide here, along with a list of prominent templates, although I suspect we can all hazard a guess as to high-profile templates that would benefit from this. Hopefully you're willing to give it a try; the more TemplateData sections get added, the better the interface can be. If you run into any problems, drop a note on the Feedback page.

Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 21:21, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 30[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ¿Which Side Are You On?, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

July 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tao of the Dead may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • content=179127# |title...And You Will Know Us By The Trail Of Dead - Tao Of The Dead |publisher=''[[Now (magazine)|Now]'' |date=February 10-17, 2011 |accessdate=2013-07-06}}</ref> [[Beats Per Minute

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:59, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Recent edits to Hot in Herre[edit]

Information.svg Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to the Hot in Herre article. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. Thank you! Lsmll 09:57, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Your "tweaks"[edit]

Your "tweaks" aren't tweaks at all, as most of them are wrong. First of all, neither Spin or Popmatters use that rating system, so stop changing it. Just because Metacritic shows 90 as the score for PopMatters, doesn't mean it's 9 stars; PopMatter's website doesn't even show a rating system. Secondly, RapReviews.com is called "RapReviews.com", evident by the massive RapReviews.com title and "© Copyright 2005 RapReviews.com" on their website. Lastly, why are you "tweaking" the titles of the references, when your iteration doesn't make it any more clearer than it already is. The only actual "tweak" you made that benifitted the article at all was the removal of the extra 's' on Rolling Stones.

And before you say that I'm "ruining" the article, I solely changed it from this to what it is now. You would probably know that if you payed attention to the article's revision history, though I suppose you were to busy making your "tweaks" right? Et3rnal 18:57, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Well, all I know is that you've created redirects in links, with Q magazine instead of Q (magazine). I've fixed tweaks yet again, okay? --Angeldeb82 (talk) 19:07, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
Wait a minute. Nevermind. --Angeldeb82 (talk) 19:09, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
Just realized your were the one that made the redirect huh? #FAIL. Et3rnal 19:17, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

October 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Dragon Quest V: Hand of the Heavenly Bride may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • //www.ign.com/articles/2009/02/11/dragon-quest-v-hand-of-the-heavenly-bride-review | work=[[IGN]]] | accessdate=2009-09-30}}</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:37, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Category:Media affected by the Columbine High School Massacre[edit]

Category:Media affected by the Columbine High School Massacre, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Beerest 2 talk 20:58, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Template nominated for deletion[edit]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Firefox release history english[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svgTemplate:Firefox release history english has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Mysterious El Willstro (talk) 08:35, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Hey there[edit]

I have been looking for friendly users for some tips on wikipedia here. So when I want to create a list, what do I do? I am trying to make a list in numerical order and in ABC order. SuperGangsterRapper95868686 (talk) 19:18, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

June 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Godzilla: Save the Earth may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • articles/2004/11/15/godzilla-save-the-earth |title=Godzilla: Save the Earth (Xbox) |publisher=IGN] |accessdate=June 29, 2014}}</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:53, 29 June 2014 (UTC)