User talk:Anonimski/Archives/2014/January

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

DYK for Anti-Serb pogrom in Sarajevo

On 6 January 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Anti-Serb pogrom in Sarajevo, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that following the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand, there was an anti-Serb pogrom in Sarajevo? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Anti-Serb pogrom in Sarajevo. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Nyttend (talk) 16:02, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anti-Serb pogrom in Sarajevo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Slovene (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Serbs supported assassins of Serbs?

With this edit (diff) you added information that 100 Serbs were arrested on suspicions of supporting the assassins. I assume they supported assassins of Franz Ferdinand? If that so then that information does not refer to this article but to article about Ferdinand's assassination. Otherwise someone might be mislead to believe that Serbs were arrested for supporting assassins of Serbs killed during this pogrom.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 21:22, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Ah, my mistake, I will add that now. Anonimski (talk) 21:23, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Image

Your replacement of the image which was previously in the infobox is appropriate. Still, I believe that previous image is illustrative and should have its place in the article. Don't you agree?--Antidiskriminator (talk) 16:39, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Yes, I agree. I first thought about putting it back somewhere in the article when/if my book request goes through, so I can scan it in higher resolution. However, if you want to put it back now, that's OK for me, maybe it'd be good as well. I'm not sure where to place it though, maybe below the image of Vancas? Anonimski (talk) 16:52, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Yes, it belongs to that section, but maybe with smaller size until you obtain better version?--Antidiskriminator (talk) 18:10, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Momcilo Gavric

Thanks for pointing me to that article. To be honest, that topic is not subject of my primary interest. I like to research and write articles on Ottoman Empire and its history on the territory of Balkans. Nevertheless, I will try if I can find some pictures of Gavric. --Antidiskriminator (talk) 19:27, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

On Politika website it says that online archives exist for period starting with 2 July 2006.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 19:33, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Here is a link to website with text about Gavric. Dan Veterana 28. jun
Link to website with information about a book on Gavric
Link to the website (maybe personal?) with more images on him.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 20:01, 12 January 2014 (UTC)