User talk:Anupmehra

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Anupmehra

Contribs —— Home —— Talk —— Email —— Identity —— Usercheck


Busy desk.svg This user is busy in real life and and is going to be on Wikipedia in off-and-on doses. This user may also respond to talk page messages or e-mails more slowly than usual, your patience is greatly appreciated. Thank you.
The Signpost
16 July 2014

Be polite, assume good faith and avoid personal attacks.
Sign and date your posts typing four tildes (~~~~)
Put new text under old text. Click here to leave me a new message.

Please comment on Talk:Steve Beren[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Steve Beren. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for your Welcome Message![edit]

Hello Anup Mehra,

Thank you for your Welcome message and I would do my best to provide for Wikipedia with new and correct articles.

Thank You and Best,

--Divyeratnadixit (talk) 12:26, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Willie Jerome Manning[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Willie Jerome Manning. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 01:12, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your participation[edit]

Anupmehra, I would like to take this moment and thank you for taking part in my RfA that happened a while ago. Although it didn't turn out as I had planned, I certainly appreciated all the comments and suggestions given by you and other people. I will learn from all of them and will hopefully run again someday when I'm fully ready. Thank you. TheGeneralUser (talk) 13:30, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ontario general election, 2014[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ontario general election, 2014. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

CURRENT AFFAIRS[edit]

PLEASE SEND ME CURRENT AFFAIRS VIA MY EMAIL ADDRESS — Preceding unsigned comment added by Randhir kumar roy (talkcontribs) 11:50, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Median strip[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Median strip. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Chris McDaniel[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Chris McDaniel. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:USRepSuccessionBox[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:USRepSuccessionBox. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

John Peel (Tamworth MP)[edit]

Thanks you very much editing John Peel (Tamworth MP) while it was under construction.

It was incredibly helpful of you to start editing the page 2 minutes after I had created it, and 1 minute after I had last saved it. NOT

It was even more helpful of you to change the referencing system while it was under construction, only 1 minute after the last save. NOT.

It's really great that instead of creating content for the encyclopedia, you jumped in at breakneck speed to disrupt another editor in the midst of an active editing session.

Great work.

Yours sincerely with love, peace and sunshine, a rather pissed-off BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 00:19, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

  • Hi BrownHairedGirl - I'm very much delighted and pleased to have you on my talk page leaving such a beautiful note for me.
I'm not sure but I heard there is a {{increation}} template for newly created pages going under major edits by the creator. Well, that's really a ugly piece of waste created by some weird person, I guess.
Yes, I'm not a content creator. It seems that some one penetrated into my Wikipedia account to create these articles for something have I been done wrong, I do not remember.
The idea of user space wp:draft and the wp:sandbox is really pathetic.
Thank you again very much, again. Have a good day! Anupmehra -Let's talk! 15:38, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
The existence of {{increation}} is of course a fine thing; I sometimes use that or {{inuse}}, depending on how long I expect to be working on the article. But whatever pointed you towards a newly-created article (whose title didn't even exist as a redlink until a few minutes before its creation) was probably a time-stamped diff, which would have indicated that the page was being worked on. The absence of a warning template should not have been a green light. It should have been evident that the page was under construction, particularly since your two edits were interspersed with one of mine and probably caused created an edit conflict for you.
However you got there, WP:CITEVAR says if the article you are editing is already using a particular citation style, you should follow it; if you believe it is inappropriate for the needs of the article, seek consensus for a change on the talk page. As with spelling differences, unless there is consensus to change, defer to the style used by the first major contributor.
Jumping in promptly and changing the referencing style immediately after the article's creation, without any attempt to discuss, runs completely counter to that guideline. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 15:57, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
Well, It seems that I was intended to make you lose your ongoing changes to that article. I did not receive any edit-conflict notice for my changes I made to correct referencing style for it was not showing sources under references section. Okay, here is the diff. links for two changes I made to the article, first, second. WP:CITEVAR is an invalid argument here, as I was not at. I do NOT care for the citation style, what I did was a fix to make appear sources under references section and delete multiple inline citations of a single source for a single line. If I was at war, I would have been undid your changes, what I did not, at least the page history says so. Prefer to the page history for evidence.
I found a page with some errors and fixed it. That's the bottom line. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 16:22, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
Not so.
You found a page which had just been created, where the only "problem" was that one of the refs was so far unsued. Only 1 minute after the creator's first edit you jumped in and changed the referencing system to an inline one, contrary to WP:CITEVAR.
Your second edit introduced an error, by moving the Craig ref to a sentence which is wholly unsupported by anything in that book. Creating a false reference is not a great idea.
You made no attempt to leave a note for the editor actively working on the article, nor did you respect the existing referencing style. Most of what you did had to be undone.
How exactly was this a helpful use of anyone's time? --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:45, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
This is the version of the article (1) I begin editing with, and this the version of the article resulted after two changes of mine (2). What do you see there? Is it worth such controversial to leave a note for? Well, now you may proceed to WP:ANI as you have got tons of evidence. New editors are a way better, who leaves, "coming soon more details" at the end of the page they create. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 17:09, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
I hoped that by leaving a note I would draw your attention to the fact that you did a pair of useless edits to an article which was only a few minutes old and still under construction. I hoped that you might understand that it was a bad thing that you had changed an existing referencing system, contrary to WP:CITEVAR, that you had created a false reference, and that most of what you did was promptly undone. I hoped that by leaving you a note, you might learn something, and not do this sort of thing again.
Sadly, you seem unconcerned by all of that. I won't take this to ANI, but if your editing does come under scrutiny, this episode will not count in your favour. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:16, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
Re-read your mighty note how pathetic does it actually read. Take your responsibility to use user space drafts or sandboxes to perform experiments and move it to mainspace when you get finished with it or place a {{increation}} template on newly created articles under going expansion to not lose your changes. Sometime even an edit-summary with the same, "under-construction/major expansion" does the trick.
Beside accepting your own fault and expecting me to act like a super natural being like that I knew, there's someone else making changes to the article, so I should prohibit myself, you came on my talk page to leave me such a non-productive, rude and ridiculous message. So, here is the result. I could have been apologize for my good faith edits, if you left me a simple, clear and constructive note here, on my talk page. You just came on here to give out your frustration on me for losing your unsaved changes. This is not the way, I expect an admin and long standing editor to act. Be civil and assume good faith.
And, it'd be my honor to have you watching my contribution history all the time. Thank you very much. Happy editing! Anupmehra -Let's talk! 09:34, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
No supernatural powers required at all. Just a very small dose of common sense.
Just don't leap into a new page one minute after an established editor has done their second edit on. You don't need magic to know that know that it was newly-edited; the page's revision history would tell you that. You don't even need to open the history page if you use [[WP:POPUPS}}: hover your mouse over a link, and it will which will show you how recently an article was last edited.
And don't change the referencing style of a newly-created article while it is clearly still under construction. Simple, and civil. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 01:45, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
Make experiments in your userspace instead, and move it to mainspace when you are finished making it without leaving a redirect. At least act like an established editor. Common sense is what you need most, as when you come running on someone's talk page to give out your frustration for errors being fixed. Templates exist for a reason, for your kind information. Read again, Five pillars of Wikipedia, there, #4. I must say, a weirdy I ever met onto here. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 05:38, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

AFC - Draft:Shinji Takeda[edit]

Hi, you declined my AFC, Draft:Shinji Takeda. I've edited it since then, and added a few more references which I think show notability. Could you please take another look when you get the chance :).

Msmarmalade (talk) 13:41, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

S2i Vector[edit]

Actually the whole lot article is only created by me show i just don't want that notice

@Sivan kumar: - WP:OWNERSHIP. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 19:07, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Seeking Advice[edit]

Hi mate, tailing your note on the talk page of the article Indian Institute of Soil Science, I would like to seek your advice on the presentation of the Vision, Mission and Mandate statements of an organization. I assume these are worded by the organization carefully and one should represent them as they are, rather than reword them with a view to avoid copyright violation; I guess presenting them as they are amounts to fair use. I am at a loss to exactly pin the issue down, would you add your comments? Cheers! --jojo@nthony (talk) 13:39, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Hello jojo@nthony, Actually, most of the times we do not wp:copy paste texts from other sources into Wikipedia. We only copy-paste when the subject of the article, or someone related to the subject has said something important, even in that case we place the copied texts in to wp:quotations. In present case, as you say, they are carefully worded by the institution and one should keep them in their original form, I'd say, they are worded to give audience, reader a message about the institution by the institution. It can easily be reworded to retain the meaning but having words changed to minimize/remove possible copyright violation. Just like, I modified yours here, "[..]these are worded by the organization carefully and one should represent them as they are[..]" to "they are carefully worded by the institution and one should keep them in their original form". I may edit the article in question sometime soon to exactly demonstrate what I mean by "re-wording". However, there are few exemptions under which we do rarely use non-free contents, can be found here. Hope, it does help. And, sorry for the late reply. I actually am a little bit busy these days around and answer talk page messages and emails more slowly than usual. You may opt to live chat with some experienced editors to get answered your queries instantly here. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 20:31, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Thanks mate, I am presently working on the WikiProject India requested articles on organizations and this would help. Thanks once again for your time. --jojo@nthony (talk) 05:23, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

New article review[edit]

When you review new articles please do not label them as test pages unless they clearly are indeed test pages. If you do not know how to correctly label them then do not do so at all, and leave them to be reviewed by an editor who can do it correctly. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 20:46, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

@Anthony Bradbury: - I'm sorry but I'm not sure what are you talking about. Marking pages as patrolled or Csd tagging? Can you please explain? Anupmehra -Let's talk! 20:50, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
I am not intending to criticize you. you have reviewed a number of pages and labeled as CSD test pages, which appears not always to be appropriate, although the CSD assessment is essentially correct. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 20:56, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
I'm a little bit confused. I just visited my CSD log and found there's none CSD-G2 in my last 100 taggings. Last csd tagging under G2 criteria was around 45 days ago and the deleting administrator deleted it for the same reason. Although, there were few wrong CSD#G2 taggings but they were all around three months back. I didn't repeat it since then. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 21:16, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of wars and anthropogenic disasters by death toll[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of wars and anthropogenic disasters by death toll. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Cory Gardner[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Cory Gardner. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Zarine[edit]

Dear User:Anupmehra, I hope you are doing well! Could you please watch the Zarine Khan article? Since the last time we discussed the article, I just noticed that the information and references have been removed. I am not always that active on Wikipedia so I thought I would inform you. With regards, AnupamTalk 01:11, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi Anupam, Yes, I'm good. I guess the same for you. That page is already in my watchlist, but again I'm too, not much active as earlier. However, I'll try to take a look there whenever I log in here. I'm glad, you were here. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 06:59, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

July 2014[edit]

Stop icon Do not add personal information about other contributors to Wikipedia, as you did at User:Anupmehra. Wikipedia operates on the principle that every contributor has the right to remain completely anonymous. Posting personal information about a user is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's harassment policy. Wikipedia policy on this issue is strictly enforced and your edits have been reverted and/or suppressed, not least because such information can appear on web searches. Wikipedia's privacy policy is there to protect the privacy of every user, including you. Persistently adding personal information about other contributors may result in you being blocked from editing. CutestPenguin {talkcontribs} 07:36, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

@Cutest Penguin: - Are you alright? See, WP:USERPAGE. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 07:40, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
That I have already seen, you too have a look of Wikipedia:USERPAGE#Personal_and_privacy-breaching_material. CutestPenguin {talkcontribs} 07:44, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Hahaha.. So, You are saying I'm harassing myself? I didn't knew that. Thanks and Go make some useful contributions rather than wasting yours and most importantly my time. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 07:48, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
I informed you as per as Wikipedia's policy! well its your choice. Thanks CutestPenguin {talkcontribs} 07:52, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Man, Harassment or attempt of harassment is when I write personal info. about some other editor on mine or some other editor writes about me on his user page. Editors are free to choose their wp:real name as username, or even write a short autobiography on theirs user page. You mis-understood the WP:Harassment, despite the word defines it well. You may have a look at WP:PRIVACY.
  • Fun-fact: This is first warning template on my user talk page since I began editing Wikipedia around 3 and half year ago.
By the way, thanks and Happy editing! Anupmehra -Let's talk! 08:04, 15 July 2014 (UTC)


Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Imran Khan (actor) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • com|date=8 February 2012|accessdate=13 January 2013}}</ref> He has endorsed several products (including [[Coca-Cola]], [[Levi Strauss & Co.|Levis]], [[MTS India]], [[Maaza]], Bru and [[Lux (

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:47, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Blindsec[edit]

HI

I am trying to create a page for Blindsec, an Information Security Company. But i have received a message saying "Speedy deletion nomination."

Please help me with this, as it's not the Spam.

Thanks Abhishek Sharma — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abhishek blindsec (talkcontribs) 08:33, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Hello Abhishek blindsec - Yes, I noticed you wrote an article on Blindsec Consulting. The newly created article was tagged for speedy deletion by me because I find it not in accordance with Wikipedia standards, as such Wikipedia articles must be written from a neutral point of view. You may also review Wikipedia notability guideline of inclusion for companies and organizations. I'd request you to first acknowledge yourself with Wikipedia policy and guidelines before writing an article on any subject so it does not get deleted. And, please start with WP:Article Wizard, so even when not in accordance with Wikipedia policy and guidelines, it'd not be deleted but declined with some helpful comments by reviewing editors to improve the article to make it in compliance with Wikipedia policy and guidelines. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 08:51, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Kick (the film)[edit]

The edit that I had done was confirmed by Taran Adarsh on his twitter account. — Preceding unsigned comment added by OSAAMA (talkcontribs) 09:16, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Need your valuable feedback: Draft:Yookos[edit]

Hi Anupmehra,

Thank you for reviewing, I really appreciate it. I could not locate where it does it sound promotional. Additionally, I just cross-checked the links which I shared under References, they landed on to Google. I'm sorry about that, I will be updating the links. Besides, do you have anything more to share about what you term as "reliable sources"?

I'd be glad to hear from you as soon as possible so that I can resubmit the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ndumiso Sambo (talkcontribs) 06:39, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Hello Ndumiso Sambo - You are required to cite your sources in the body of the submission as inline citations. Please see, Referencing for beginners for how to do it. Citations help to identify reliable sources on which an article is based. Claims not supported by any reliable source sound promotional. Just convert external links under References into footnotes and re-submit. Regards, Anupmehra -Let's talk! 07:07, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for writing back and guiding. Need one confirmation- I am supposed to change the links only, right? Is the language of the article fine? Ndumiso Sambo (talk) 10:23, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
@Ndumiso Sambo: Yes, convert the external links into inline citations. The language of the article will be determined after examining reliable sources. If multiple reliable sources write, Yookos is the biggest brand of this universe, then writing the same is fine but if none says so, and you write the same, then it is not fine. Hope, it is clear. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 10:43, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

New Page Patrol[edit]

Hi. Dr Viney Pushkarna was clearly unsuitable for inclusion in Wikipedia yet you marked it as patrolled. Please take a moment to fully review and understand the instructions at WP:NPP and WP:DELETION. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:26, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Hello Kudpung - Thank you for your kind advice. Yes, the page was clearly unsuitable for inclusion but suitable for speedy deletion. That's why I tagged it for the same. Please note that, when one tags a page for speedy deletion using twinkle, it automatically marks the following page as patrolled. It appears that, csd tag was removed by the creator of the article and the article was later expanded to make it eligible for deletion under A7 and G11 criterias rather than mine G1. You may find the CSD notification on the creator's talk page (diff. link) and an entry in my CSD log at #25 under July 2014 section. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 14:13, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. You're quite right. I'm sorry I bothered you. My bad for not having checked the page history. I usually do but this page was such a mess I simply forgot to look and retagged it for deletion. I would have course have deleted it myself if I had seen the first CSD tag.--Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 18:31, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Michael Douglas[edit]

Hello. I have noticed on the revision history page of Michael Douglas that you were quite unclear of my recent edits for Douglas. On my defense, it is quite common in Wikipedia to leave the Edit summary blank upon submitting the article's change. If you wish for more explanation, feel free to send a message to my talk page. Thank you. Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 21:10, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Scholar[edit]

He is well known as a scholar, however it is a pending review. 109.157.151.98 (talk) 13:44, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Nikola Tesla[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Nikola Tesla. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Please review my draft[edit]

Sir, I have edited my draft recently declined by you, I have added more references for making it more reliable Draft:Samita Bangargi Rajsector3 (talk) 17:07, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Thanks[edit]

Thank you for making me a new account. Secretlady (talk) 22:28, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Please Comment on Talk:MagicMail[edit]

If you let me know how I could improve my MagicMail article enough to remove the delete notice, that would be greatly appreciated.

-Bob — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wizard robertb (talkcontribs) 19:11, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Hello Bob - There recently (4 days ago) have been a deletion discussion on the subject of your article, whether it is suitable for inclusion or not and unfortunately it was not found in accordance with Wikipedia general notability guideline and Wikipedia notability guideline for organizations (commercial or otherwise), or any of its products and services. The same issue still persists. What can you do here, is to show significant coverage of the subject in the secondary, independent and reliable sources and establish notability of the subject. I've already been made an unsuccessful attempt to find some online. Now, if you believe the Wikipedia community and me have missed something important, and the subject of your article is notable and merits an article on Wikipedia as per Wikipedia notability guideline, you may file a deletion review which will examine present contents of the article, if it is not same as it was earlier and in present shape is eligible for inclusion. Hope, it does help. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 19:30, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Regarding Talk:MagicMail - Multiple Accounts[edit]

Anupmehra,

We have multiple employees with accounts who sometimes edit our pages. Was there any issue you had in particular?

-Bob — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wizard robertb (talkcontribs) 19:53, 23 July 2014 (UTC)