User talk:Arceus fan

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Arceus fan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm sorry for vandalising and I want to contribute as a good user again

Decline reason:

Declined for now; see below. —Animum (talk) 17:40, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your request for unblocking has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
- If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas.
Click edit this page on that article and scroll down past the message informing you of your block.
Copy the source of that article and paste it to the bottom of your talk page under a new top-level heading (like this: = Article title =)
Propose some significant and well researched improvements to your article by editing your personal copy of the article.
When are you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
- If we are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{helpme|your question here}}" to your talk page. Thank you. —Animum (talk) 17:40, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try but it will take a while to find an article to edit. I'll do my best and you have my word! If you look here I made regular census contributions I also confess to using sockpuppets as any variations of "RapidRocker" accounts that vandalise then make a new account to avoid the autoblock and "master of sockpuppets"--Arceus fan (talk) 17:49, 24 December 2007 (UTC) {{helpme|Can I just contribute to talk pages as a part of census since I don't know how to fix an article?}} You appear to be willing to contribute in good faith. I will bring up your request before the administrator's noticeboard. Please hold tight. The Evil Spartan (talk) 21:36, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I support unblocking this user. Bstone (talk) 22:57, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock[edit]

I have unblocked per the consensus here. To Arceus fan; if it gets a little too much for you (wikistress, etc.) then just take a break or ask for help. Good editors are always welcome and will be helped. Cheers. LessHeard vanU (talk) 00:48, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Pokémon[edit]

The list of participants of the Pokémon WikiProject is quite sizable, however, there is no way to determine which of whom are active contributors to that project. All participants in the list have been moved to Inactive. If you consider yourself to be an active member of the Pokémon WikiProject, please go to Wikipedia:WikiProject Pokémon#Participants and move your username to the Active section. Thank you. Useight (talk) 23:09, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Great Revival: CVU Vandalism Studies Project[edit]

Hi! We're dropping you this rather unexpected message on your talk page because you signed up (either quite a while ago or rather recently) to be a member of the Vandalism Studies project. Sadly, the project fell into semi-retirement a few years ago, but as part of a new plan to fix up the Counter-Vandalism Unit, we're bringing back the Vandalism Studies project, with a new study planned for Late 2012! But we need your help. Are you still interested in working with us on this project? Then please sign up today! (even if you signed up previously, you'll still need to sign up again - we're redoing our member list in order to not harass those who are no longer active on the Wiki - sorry!) If you have any questions, please leave them on this page. Thanks, and we can't wait to bring the project back to life! -Theopolisme (talk) & Dan653 (talk), Coordinators