User talk:Arfaz

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from User talk:Arfazph)
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

B. M. Gafoor[edit]

Copyright-problem.svg

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of B. M. Gafoor, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.hindu.com/2003/11/14/stories/2003111407960400.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 09:43, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:127HoursCover.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:127HoursCover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:36, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:127HoursCover.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:127HoursCover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 08:08, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

BLPs[edit]

Regarding your edit summary [1] - for article content about living people, "sourced enough" is EVERY claim being appropriately sourced. We have no idea what content may be "controversial" for any particular living persons situation. Active Banana (bananaphone 17:57, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

January 2011[edit]

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload new images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to an article, specifically 127 Hours (soundtrack), may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free image criteria. Please note that we take very seriously our criteria on non-free image uploads and users who repeatedly upload or misuse non-free images may be blocked from editing. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. ΔT The only constant 02:30, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Kayam[edit]

Thanks for the correction. BOVINEBOY2008 05:37, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Cricket World Cup song: De Ghumaa Ke[edit]

Hi Arfazph, could you please improve this page: De Ghumaa Ke, the page for the official song of 2011 Cricket World Cup composed by Shankar-Ehsaan-Loy. It would be very helpful.--Karyasuman (talk) 05:44, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Can I have a fast reply?--Karyasuman (talk) 09:46, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
Not really, but they performed it live with the Red FM Team at Red FM studio. Here is the link: Shankar-Ehsaan-Loy live @Red FM studio Part B (De Ghuma Ke).wmv. This may help you.--Karyasuman (talk) 13:01, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Copyright in plot summaries[edit]

Hello. The plot summary you added to Samrajyam has been removed. Plot summaries cannot be copied from other sources, even official ones, but must be written in your own language. If you have copied plots into other articles, please go back and remove or rewrite them so that they comply. Thanks. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:37, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for finding references and for all the cleaning up[edit]

The Citation Barnstar The Citation Barnstar
I just wanted to say a big thank you for all the supporting references you added in Prithviraj Sukumaran — I breathed a sigh of relief just now when I saw your latest edit there — and in so many other helpful edits where you have added references or cleaned things up. It makes vandalism so much easier to spot when the existing info is sourced. Your work on various Indian film articles has been greatly appreciated. AtticusX (talk) 13:17, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Balanscreenshot.jpg[edit]

Hi Arfazph, I think {{PD-India}} is applicable for this image.--Kiran Gopi (talk) 19:23, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Johnjafferjanardhananfilm.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Johnjafferjanardhananfilm.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --MGA73 (talk) 09:36, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Putturmees.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Putturmees.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sreejith K (talk) 16:19, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Best selling music artists[edit]

If you would like to, please contribute to the discussion on Talk:List of best-selling music artists that you've helped to revive on A. R. Rahman. Thank you. Lifebonzza (talk) 23:17, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Arfaz. You have new messages at Skier Dude's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Autopatrolled[edit]

Wikipedia Autopatrolled.svg

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

  • This permission does not give you any special status or authority
  • Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
  • You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
  • If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it
If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing!HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:00, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Arfaz. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2011_January_19.
Message added 01:14, 2 February 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

My close of this image also references a comment that you made in the PUF discussion. SchuminWeb (Talk) 01:14, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Reviewer granted[edit]

Wikipedia Reviewer.svg

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Dabomb87 (talk) 15:39, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Karma (story)[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Karma (story) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no indication of notability, no sources

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Huon (talk) 14:39, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

I somehow managed not to actually tag the article for proposed deletion; I've now done so. Huon (talk) 18:14, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
Feel free to remove the proposed deletion tag from the article (unlike the tag for a full discussion at Articles for Deletion, which should not be removed). If it remains in place for a week, that counts as no one objecting to the article's deletion. I just did a Google Scholar search, and some reviews might be found there. I'm rather busy over the weekend, but if I find the time, I'll try to add some secondary sources to the article and remove the proposed deletion tag myself. Huon (talk) 12:11, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
That wasn't me adding the sources, but some anonymous editor. Google Scholar does find quite a lot of rather impressive sources, though. Huon (talk) 08:50, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Couples Retreat Cover.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Couples Retreat Cover.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 11:24, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Malayalam silent films[edit]

Can you point to an existing list or category of Malayalam/kannada silent films. I have gotten around to adding them to the south indian silent film list as you suggested.I thought i would ask you if there is already a cat/list for them.--Sodabottle (talk) 15:45, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Uttarayanam[edit]

While patrolling new pages, I found Uttarayanam; well done on the great article! Ironholds (talk) 15:59, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Cocktail.[edit]

Cocktail is very much a remake of 'Butterfly on a Wheel'. The Sify review given in referenve there clearly states - " Cocktail is a straightforward rip-off from Mike Barker's Butterfly on a wheel aka Shattered". If you see both the films, you can clearly make out that scenes and dialogues are directly lifted from the original. But it will not make Cocktail any lesser a film :-) Only a few additional scenes are added in Cocktail, like the climax scene and Innocent's part.
Anish Viswa 13:37, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Edit war warning[edit]

you appear to be edit warrring on Shreya Ghoshal. Please stop. Active Banana (bananaphone 21:08, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

An award=[edit]

The South Indian Cinema Award. Awarded to Arfaz for outstanding work on Malayalam cinema.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:54, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

You've done some amazing work on improving quality in Malayalam film articles. You definitely deserve this award. May you eventually start all of the red links in List of Malayalam films! Keep up the great work. It is nice to see anybody doing decent quality work on Indian cinema, especially to more neglected ones. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:54, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Gadhama filming.JPG[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Gadhama filming.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. feydey (talk) 09:06, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Pilots (film)[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Pilots (film), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.subs.to/movie-details/xAkr5aom.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:46, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pilots (film)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Pilots (film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Gabriele449 (talk) 21:20, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Adikkurippu[edit]

This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Adikkurippu, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.bharatmovies.com/malayalam/info/Adikkurippu.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) VWBot (talk) 11:21, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:If I Rise live.jpg[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

Thanks for uploading File:If I Rise live.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. 21:49, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Kaaryasthan screenshot.jpg[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

Thanks for uploading File:Kaaryasthan screenshot.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. 21:50, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Re: Kireedam[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Arfaz. You have new messages at Talk:Kireedam (1989 film).
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Welcome to WikiProject Film[edit]

Welcome!
Video-x-generic.svg

Hey, welcome to WikiProject Film! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of films, awards, festivals, filmmaking, and film characters. If you haven't already, please add {{User WikiProject Film}} to your user page.

A few features that you might find helpful:

  • Most of our important discussions about the project itself and its related articles take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.

There is a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

  • Want to jump right into editing? The style guidelines show things you should include.
  • Want to assist in some current backlogs within the project? Visit the Announcements template to see how you can help.
  • Want to see some great film article examples? Head on over to the spotlight department.
  • Want to know how good our articles are? Our assessment department has rated the quality of the majority of film article in Wikipedia. Check it out!

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Erik (talk | contribs) 00:18, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Date of birth[edit]

Note that I've removed the birthdate you added to Amrita Prakash - there have been a few editors changing the date previously, none of whom supplied a source, so it has been removed entirely. Please go ahead and restore it as long as you include a reference for verification. Thank you, --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 02:20, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

TN Awards[edit]

This is why I hate Wikipedia! Within seconds someone who hasn't won anything can become a winner and a winner can turn a loser! What a devastating effect! Look, it's so easy! Some years back some genius added Rahman's name as the winner for Bombay (to be precise on 15 September 2008), ever since, everybody has been looking into wikipedia and writing their articles and lists, referring to this one list. The sources you gave (the second one doesn't open at all) and any source you are going to present me, I bet they all were and would be published after this auspicious day only and they all will be based on wikipedia only and I promise, you won't be able to present a single reliable source prior to this date, which cites Rahman as the winner of this award in 1995! That book is a recent release, you said, didn't you? Of course, it is! Your sources are reliable, but anything I provide will be unreliable, eh? How do you believe will a site published in 1998 look like? Come on, you know the truth as much as I do and the fact that you are jumping, that you have to jump from one to another to another and to another "source" to portray Rahman as the winner itself is proof enough for that. I am really tired of this recurring discussions with people like you and if you are still not convinced and are so keen to add another award to Rahman's already overflowing shelf, please either discuss here or simply do add Rahman's list to the page. Rahman himself wouldn't care a bit about this! Whatever, but thanks a ton! God bless! Johannes003 (talk) 13:31, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Dreams (2000 film)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Dreams (2000 film). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Dreamz. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Dreamz - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions.
Anish Viswa 18:14, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at Dreams (2000 film)[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Dreams (2000 film), a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 18:28, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Malayalam films[edit]

HI. I created the films by Mohan (director) and Kunchacko which you may wish to expand. If you want any more films started let me know; I'd be happy to start all of the missing Malayalam films...♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:15, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Thankyou for your reply. Gadhama is excellent work of which you should be proud of. I will help you try to promote it to GA. It certainly looks good enough, although I haven't read it all yet. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:49, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Not at all. As long as it is a reliable source and not a fan site or blog. I am now generating 1960s Malayalam films and will create articles for the lot. User:Tinucherian was going to do it ages ago. I think we should have as good a coverage for Malayalam cinema as Bollywood so I think getting them at least started they can be built up over time and all those red links won't seem so daunting. Just work on articles at our own pace and don't worry about how many need work! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:59, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Problematic sources in Gadhama will be Kerals9.com, India glitz, Metromatinee, Sancinema, Now running, Yentha. The others are reliable I think.♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:22, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Rafi Stamp.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rafi Stamp.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 06:23, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

WP:FILM March 2011 Newsletter[edit]

The March 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 21:07, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

A. R. Rahman[edit]

Hi Arfaz. I'm glad you took over for Vignesh. I appreciate the fixes you have made, however, I cannot pass the article with two pressing issues. Firstly, it is conflicting with consensus on the article page I pointed to you. There is consensus that because he has little certifications he cannot possibly have those sales. Also, I find it impossible to believe that from 2003 to 2010 he has sold 150 million records. Even Mariah Carey didn't sell that much in the 90s, and thats saying a lot.--CallMeNathanTalk2Me 00:16, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Collector (film).jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Collector (film).jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 22:13, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Thampu[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Thampu, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.cinemaofmalayalam.net/thampu.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:45, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Regarding Kamal Haasan's malayalam films[edit]

Hi since u r frm Kerala I'd like to know about Kamal Haasan's malayalam films. I want to know abt the storyline of his films like Kanyakumari, yetta madanolsavam ,etc., I suggest you to expand those articles (his malayalam films). ive been searching it for years even many malayalis dont have idea about these films. so if u have idea about these two films feel free to share with me.--Thalapathi 08:09, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

ya I want some more detailed info on '"yetta". I have seen that film on internet. But hardly couldn't understand as I dnt knw malayalam. What kind of triangular love story is that. Is it an adult film. Can u elaborate a little more or try to expand the article.--Thalapathi 10:16, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Hey it seems like you yourself say except madanolsavam others are not worth to watch, even yaetta. Then i ask u why you want those films to be listed in the notable filmography. Anyway we'll have a discussion regarding this later. For now I leave it to you. Those films will not be removed till I discuss with another veteran editor.--Thalapathi 10:23, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

One more doubt is allauddinum arputha vilakkum a direct malayalam film or a dubbed one frm Tamil. I have seen it few times in Tamil. Was it really mades seperately in malayalam. If the it will be Rajini's debut film in malayalam. Also do u have any idea about Garjanai (Rajini starrer).--Thalapathi 10:33, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Dear, since am a Tamil, I dont have much idea about his malayalam films. I only came to that he has done many films in malayalam just before 3 years. Regarding Aakali Rajyam, he has won a filmfare award and is considered a classic by Telugu audience. Even Telugu legend ANR said films like Aakali Rajyam and Saagara Sangamam are a trendsetter and memorable classics in Telugu cinema. The lits isn't biased towards Telugu because his other two films like Saagara Sangamam and Swathi Muthyam are considered legendary by the critics and he has won Best actor at asian film festival (International level). For no other film even in tamil he has won such recognition at that time. Also none of his malayalam films have won national awards (for films). Ek Duje KE Liye deserves a place but when I added many didn't agree. Even Sadma (Hindi Moondram Pirai)was highly acclaimed and he got nominations for EDKL anf Sadma and even Chchi 420. He has won filmfare awards for Aakali Rajyam, SS and Indrudu Chandrudu. Indrudu Chandrudu truely deserves a place in the list since he has won Nandi awards and filmfare awards for it. It was a high grossing film in 1989. Even Subha Sankalpam deserves a place here, but am not including it. I've never seen Kamal Haasan saying special about his Malayalam films. I read an interview which was published by Daily Thanthi in which he told, I've always had a feeling that inspite of many films in malayalam i din't feel like giving a legendary film like nayagan or SS oveer there. In that aspect Mammooty and Mohanlal are ahead of me. Also He hasn't mentioned anything special about kanyakumari or any other film there. I remember him saying in an interview to Radio One in Chennai that I had to act in few malayalam film earlier since i was left with few offers in tamil at that time. He praises Malayalam films only when he is interviewed by kerala media, which have seen his speech during asianet film awards and Kerala govt. function and also one more function where he participated with Ilaiyaraaja. He said in Daily Thanthi Interview that "I did my full fledged lead role in malayalam (He didn't even mentioned the name as kanyakumari) and a film called vishnu vijayam which was shot withinh 13 days and it ran well. he didn't mentioned about his other films like vayanadan Thampan or Madanolsavam. He also said that my father wasn't happy when i got my first filmfare for malayalam film. He tld that am only 10 percent matured as an actor. If I get it for a Tamil film, I'm 50 percent matured and for a Hindi film im 80 percent matured and for a hollywood film am complete. So it was the main success behind me for getting 4 consecutive filmfare awards in tamil after that. "He speaks more like a Telugu when he speaks to Telugu media. Even Sommakdidhi Sokkakadidhi, a Telugu film deserves a place. It was his second film where he played dual role. It was a run away hit in Andhra and a big hit in Tamil Nadu as well when dubbed into Tamil. So what am saying is if we still say many films deserve a place the list will go on. Regarding Anbe Sivam, it was a highly acclaimed film but he didn't get any award. The film was a poor grosser. Vettaiyadu Vilaiyadu, I dont think it deserves a place here, I once tried removing VV but many didn't agree.--Thalapathi 05:02, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

I wont agree Yetta might be the first film which gave him a break as romantic hero, Maro Charitra (Original of EDKL) was the his first film which gave him a break as romantic hero which was considered by himself as well as Telugu audience. Also there is one film called called Uyarnthavargal (1977), where he and the heroine (Sujatha) both a deaf-dumb or something like that, a remake of Sanjeev Kumar's film. That was a great film indeed. It was a touching story. One more graet film was Ilamai Oonjaladukirathu and its Telugu remake Vayasu Pilichindi. It too gave him a break as a romantic hero. It not only showcased him as a romatic hero but also his acting skills. --Thalapathi 05:10, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Regarding Hey Ram, it was a poor grosser and controversial yet it got rave reviews. It was India's official entry to oscars. So it definitely becomes a notable film. It was also screened at International Film Festivals at Rotterdam, International Film Festival of India and at Locarno International Film Festival. Kamal Haasan also got awards from FIlmfare, Filmfans and Cinema Express. --Thalapathi 06:50, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

This debate about what movies should be selected for "notable filmography" lists sounds interesting enough that I've brought it up at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force. Please share your thoughts there. EelamStyleZ (talk) 14:02, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dreams 2000 film.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dreams 2000 film.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 06:01, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Kavikuyil[edit]

Hi. Sombody just tried to speedy this. Can you try to add something to it?♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:17, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Mohan[edit]

Well I need some details on the cast of that film atleast. Other than Ilaiyaraaja and Devaraj Mohan nothing great is mentioned there. --Thalapathi (Ping Back) 10:15, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

A debate is going on Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Film/Indian_cinema_task_force so as to ensure what films must be listed under notable filmography. Also another debate, who gets credited for a film if it gets an award (directors or producers). Do participate. --Thalapathi (Ping Back) 10:22, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

I dont have a clear idea on Uravadum Nenjam. The link you provided says, its a 1976 Tamil film starring Jaishankar and Telugu actress Chandrakala. I've never heard about this film. Also I have a doubt whether Allauddinum Arputha Vilakkum was made seperately in Malayalam and Tamil or a Tamil film dubbed into Malayalam. I have seen that film during my childhood. Watching the lip movement of the actors it was clear that it wasn't dubbed from malayalam, and its a pure tamil film. But still many sources say its a bi-lingual and others say its a mallu film dubbed into Tamil. According to rajini fans' website. It says it was Rajini's debut malayalam film released on apr 14, 1979 while the tamil version was released on jun 8, 1979. --Thalapathi (Ping Back) 10:42, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Also Devaraj Mohan refers to two persons or a single person. Am not sure abt the details of the director. Is he a mallu director who has made films in Tamil too or a both are different. --Thalapathi (Ping Back) 10:56, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Vaazhve Maayam[edit]

Are you sure vaazhve Maayam is a remake of the malayalam film with the same title. To my knowledge it's a remake of the 1981 Telugu film Premabhishekam --Thalapathi (Ping Back) 11:26, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Well that's great!! Infact vaazhvey Maayam (Malayalm version) was remade in Telugu and Tamil. Do you know who played the role of Sridevi and Sripriya role in Malayalam?? --Thalapathi (Ping Back) 13:57, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Well I'm surprised after reading the story of the Malayalam version. I'd definitely say the plot of the two movies are no where related to each other. The Tamil version is a remake of the Telugu film Premabhishekam, starring Akkineni Nageswara Rao, Sridevi and Jayasudha. It was released in 1981. The Tamil version was released in 1982. The role of 28 year old Kamal Haasan was played by the 58 year old Nageswara Rao in Telugu. Not sure about the director, music was by Gangai Amaran. The story goes like this: Kamal Haasan, a happy-go-lucky guy falls in love with sridevi, a girl from a rich family. He tries all sorts of tricks to woo her. But Sridevi not impressed by Kamal, doesn't take his seriously. Meanwhile, her brother (Jaishankar) arranges a marriage with other person. Disastrous Kamal, becomes a heavy alcoholic, and finds solace in Sripriya, a prostitute. Finally he also gets to know that he is affected by cancer. Sridevi comes to know about his true love and comes to see him at Sripriya's residence. But Kamal, rejects her love and dies on the lap of Sripriya. A tragic love story. The telugu version was a super hit, while the Tamil version wasn't much impressive as the Telugu version. --Thalapathi (Ping Back) 05:27, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

thanks for expanding Hakim (director) article[edit]

thanks for expanding Hakim (director) article —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sim tcr (talkcontribs) 19:04, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

WP:FILM April 2011 Newsletter[edit]

The April 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 22:36, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Makaramanjuaudio.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Makaramanjuaudio.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:35, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Babaaudiocover.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Babaaudiocover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 03:41, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

1970s[edit]

Hi Arfaz! can you expand Kanyakumari and Vishnu Vijayam. Also there is no clue about many of his Malayalam films released between 1975 and 1977 with the exception of few. Regards! --Thalapathi (Ping Back) 15:01, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

And thanks for cleaning up Rana. --Thalapathi (Ping Back) 15:02, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

WP:FILM May 2011 Newsletter[edit]

The May 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 01:39, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Kerala Film Critics Association Awards[edit]

If possible, please support this article.
Anish Viswa 10:06, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

A Story That Begins at the End and A Dog's Day[edit]

I like to draw your attention and seek your help on the name of these 2 articles on malayalam films. These films are Arimpara and Pattiyude Divasam respectively. These films were screened in Cannes and just for promotional purposes, English titles as above were used. But these films were never dubbed and shown in English, nor any English versions of these fims exist. I moved these films to its original titles but got reverted by another person citing WP:NCF and WP:UE ( Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film#A Dog's Day. But I strongly feel these rules will not be applicable here as these films are purely Malayalam and the english name was only for the foreign award festivals. If we continue this all our famous and prestigious films that got screened outside with alternate titles will get renamed in Wiki like Veetilekkulla Vazhi (The Way Home), Makaramanju (the Mist in Capricorn) etc. Even films like Urumi, Chithrasoothram, Naalu Pennungal, Oru Pennum Randanum (A Woman and Two Men) etc. etc. will then will get moved. In that cases our films will lose its identity in Wiki. I remeber you changing The Mother Earth back to Bhoomi Mlayalam. I request you to please check the above films also and give the proper film names to those articles and explain it there.
Anish Viswa 10:49, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Veettilekkulla Vazhi.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Veettilekkulla Vazhi.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:13, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Neelakuyil[edit]

No. You are wrong. Best Feature Film means its Swarna Kamal.. Neelakuyil won President's Silver Medal that means Rajat Kamal. So its the second best film. Best Feature Film of that year is Mirza Ghalib. So my change is correct. Thank You. User:SidhardhRamesh (talk) 21:07, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Re Filmfare Awards South[edit]

Hi! just check out Filmfare Award for Best Actor (Malayalam), someone has added that Sathyan won the award in 1963 and 1969. The source he has provided doesn't seem to work for me. Check out this [2] published by The Times of India. It clearly states that Awards for Best Actor, actress and director were given only from 1972. --Commander (Ping Me) 16:21, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Shajoon Karyal[edit]

Hi, please move the title "Shajoon Karyal" to "Shajoon Kariyal". It's his name's correct spelling as in his personal Facebook Profile. I tried but can't.
Also my heartful regards to you for your hardcore contributions in Malayalam Cinema articles. Well done.... Thank You --> User:SidhardhRamesh (talk) 9:59, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Thank You[edit]

Hi, Thank you so much for your recognition... User:SidhardhRamesh (talk) 5:29, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Marykkundoru Kunjaadu[edit]

Hello, Is there an English caption 'Mary had a little lamb' used in the film ? If so, I agree. If not, 'Marykkundoru Kunjaadu' will translate to 'Mary has a little lamb' only. You know the original nursery rhyme is written in past tense. So, there it is correct. But when it was translated to Malyalam it was written in present tense. So in Malyalam text books it is 'Marykkundoru Kunjaadu'. But 'undu' is present tense and thus cannot be translated as 'had', it can only be 'has' or 'have'. Just see, if you correctly translate 'Mary had a little lamb' to Malayalam, it will be 'Marykkundayirunnu oru Kunjaadu'.
Anish Viswa 22:52, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

'Mary had a little lamb' sounds better because that nursery rhyme is very familiar to all of us from childhood. But here it is grammatically incorrect. That's all :-)
Anish Viswa 11:07, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ratchagancover.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ratchagancover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:44, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Khaddama[edit]

Hi

I have replaced the cn's and added the reasons on the talk page. I appreciate that you thought that they were already covered, but they were not.

Please try and understand why I added them and address the issues before removing them. Thanks Chaosdruid (talk) 17:57, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

WP:FILM June 2011 Newsletter[edit]

The June 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. We are also seeking new members to assist in writing the newsletter, if interested please leave a note on the Outreach department's talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 04:30, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Re Filmfare Awards South[edit]

Hello, I think this is Chiranjeevi's 9th Filmfare award. He has seven "Best Actor", one Legendary and one Lifetime Achievement Award. Also Mammooty had previously won 10 isn't it. --Commander (Ping Me) 03:45, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Adaminte Makan Abu GAN[edit]

For future reference, an article should not be nominated for GA when it has cleanup tags. If someone were to review the Adaminte Makan Abu article right now, they would be able to quick-fail it. GAN is not a place to nominate articles that need work to bring them up to the GA standard, they should already meet the criteria. Peer review is the place to ask for feedback on how an article can be further improved. You can withdraw the GAN for Adaminte Makan Abu by removing the {{GA nominee}} template from the article talk page. If you choose to not withdraw the nomination, you should resolve the long Critical response section issue as soon as possible. Thank you. - Kollision (talk) 02:11, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

B. S. Abdur Rahman University[edit]

Can you please merge B. S. Abdur Rahman Crescent Engineering College with B. S. Abdur Rahman University. Both Pages refer to the same university. Thank you Naveed Navhus (talk) 11:16, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Copyright and close paraphrasing[edit]

Hi, I'm currently copy-editing Elektra (2011 film) as you requested at the Guild of Copy-editors. However, I am concerned that the article contains very close paraphrasing from copyrighted websites.

One specific example; from Wikipedia's article Elektra (2011 film):

"...Erakal, which tells the story of a wealthy, aristocratic, land-owning Christian family's descent into evil and the twin threads of revenge and remorse."

From the cited source:

"...‘Erakal,' which tells the story of a wealthy, aristocratic, land-owning Christian family's descent into evil and the twin threads of revenge and remorse..."

You cannot copy and paste text directly from copyrighted sources in this manner, even if you cite the website that the text comes from as a source. Please see WP:COPYVIO, Let's get serious about plagiarism, and Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing for more details.

  • Are there more sections in the Elektra article that use entire phrases from the cited source in this way?
  • Are there sections in other articles you have written or contributed to, that do so? --Demiurge1000 (talk) 10:49, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

WP:FILM July 2011 Newsletter[edit]

The July 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. We are also seeking new members to assist in writing the newsletter, if interested please leave a note on the Outreach department's talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 03:31, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Invite to WikiConference India 2011[edit]

WCI banner.png

Hi Arfaz,

The First WikiConference India is being organized in Mumbai and will take place on 18-20 November 2011.
You can see our Official website, the Facebook event and our Scholarship form.

But the activities start now with the 100 day long WikiOutreach.

As you are part of WikiProject India community we invite you to be there for conference and share your experience. Thank you for your contributions.

We look forward to see you at Mumbai on 18-20 November 2011

Email complaint to Wikipedia about your copyvio[edit]

An email complaint has been made by the owner of this blog about your use of material in the article Kuttyedathi. Upon a review of this talk page and your failure to respond to earlier complaints I am indefinitely blocking you from editing. You are of course welcome to appeal. Dougweller (talk) 17:45, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

August 2011[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted.

Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dougweller (talk) 17:46, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Film directors mentioned in the film[edit]

Hii this is regarding - cinema of India, directors like K. viswanath and K. Balachander. The statement is trying to give info about Indian film makers whose films were admired and screened at International film festivals from different regions. This statement can be completely avoided and can be included in individual articles. The statement is not trying to provide names of internationally acclaimed film directors. There is no point of vandalism in this.

Please expalin this to the other editor, who is making baseless issue on this.

(183.82.193.202 (talk) 17:46, 4 August 2011 (UTC)).

Orphaned non-free image File:Khaddama book.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Khaddama book.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:53, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Chintha Ravi.jpg[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

Thanks for uploading File:Chintha Ravi.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:03, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Ninnishtam Ennishtam 2 for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ninnishtam Ennishtam 2 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ninnishtam Ennishtam 2 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dougweller (talk) 16:00, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:C.I.D. Nazir.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:C.I.D. Nazir.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:43, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Tajmahalsoundtrack.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tajmahalsoundtrack.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 01:37, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

WP:FILM September 2011 Newsletter[edit]

The September 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —Erik (talk | contribs) 16:36, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Thelegendofbhagatsinghcover.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Thelegendofbhagatsinghcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:18, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

2011 WikiProject Film coordinator election[edit]

Voting for WikiProject Film's October 2011 project coordinator election has started. We are aiming to select five coordinators to serve for the next year; please take a moment from editing to vote here by October 29! Erik (talk | contribs) 11:56, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Desatanakkili Karayarilla Poster.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Desatanakkili Karayarilla Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:03, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Megastar Mammootty[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Megastar Mammootty, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Commander (Ping Me) 10:12, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Amma Manas Nanma Manas for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amma Manas Nanma Manas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amma Manas Nanma Manas until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.
Anish Viswa 04:35, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Kadhal Anukkal.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Kadhal Anukkal.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. —SpacemanSpiff 21:49, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Pranchiposter.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pranchiposter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:11, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Jodifilm.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jodifilm.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:49, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Ra.One nominated for Featured Article[edit]

This notice is to inform you that I have nominated the article Ra.One for a featured article promotion. The nomination can be viewed here. Any comments are welcome at the article's or my talk page. Thank you. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 13:25, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Judgement Day (2012 film)[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Judgement Day (2012 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There is no project like this.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
Anish Viswa 08:50, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Pranchistill.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Pranchistill.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Westeros91 (talk) 00:41, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Pranchi150.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pranchi150.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:49, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Platform No. 1 for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Platform No. 1 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Platform No. 1 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.
Anish Viswa 02:29, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Mannu.jpg)[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading File:Mannu.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:02, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Swadesalbumcover.jpg)[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading File:Swadesalbumcover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:07, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Hazir for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hazir is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hazir until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 04:29, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Mayyaguru.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mayyaguru.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 11:09, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:41GTZNZNXTL. SL500 AA300 .jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:41GTZNZNXTL. SL500 AA300 .jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:32, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Pranchiposter.jpg)[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading File:Pranchiposter.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:01, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Kathathudarunnu.jpg)[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading File:Kathathudarunnu.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:08, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Novemberinte Nashtam.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Novemberinte Nashtam.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Raziman T V (talk) 13:18, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Nellu (1974)2.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nellu (1974)2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Raziman T V (talk) 13:33, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Iruttinte Athmavu.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Iruttinte Athmavu.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Raziman T V (talk) 13:39, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Superpolicecover.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Superpolicecover.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:07, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Dubaifilm.jpg)[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading File:Dubaifilm.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:01, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Anupamasinger2.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Anupamasinger2.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 12:05, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Annupamaasinging.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Annupamaasinging.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 12:06, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Nayakalbumcover.jpg)[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading File:Nayakalbumcover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:25, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Palunkuposter.jpg)[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading File:Palunkuposter.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:27, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Thrillerfilmalbumcover.jpg)[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading File:Thrillerfilmalbumcover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:36, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Pranchi150.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pranchi150.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:08, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Viddikalude Swargam[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Viddikalude Swargam has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable collection. No refs. No claim of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:32, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Shankaranum Mohanum.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Shankaranum Mohanum.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sreejith K (talk) 16:45, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Irshad (actor)[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Irshad (actor) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability, no significant coverage in third-party sources, verifiability issues.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Huon (talk) 17:09, 19 October 2013 (UTC) Huon (talk) 17:09, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Critical response to Adaminte Makan Abu for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Critical response to Adaminte Makan Abu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Critical response to Adaminte Makan Abu until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –Dream out loud (talk) 19:02, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lavender film.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lavender film.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:56, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Raavancdcover.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Raavancdcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:33, 21 April 2014 (UTC)