User talk:Arnoutf

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
  • If you post a message on my talk page, I will also answer here, in general I will not write a response on your talk page. So if you want to know the answer to a remark, please check back here.
  • Although I am Dutch myself I prefer to discuss in English as standard language and will maintain that even here. This allows every visitor to see what we are talking about.
  • For discussions on articles, in general I prefer to use the talk page of that article instead of talking through the personal talk pages; this in order to maintain centralised discussion.

Arnoutf

Sandbox for trying stuff


Nomination of Government of the Dutch Republic in exile for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Government of the Dutch Republic in exile is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Government of the Dutch Republic in exile until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

Nomination for deletion of Template:Principal cities of the Netherlands[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svgTemplate:Principal cities of the Netherlands has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.

Opinion[edit]

Hi, i would like to have your opinion about a discussion which i started here, thank.Kingroyos (talk) 22:53, 27 May 2014 (UTC)


Social Psychology[edit]

I did add the replication crisis section to the social psychology page. Please feel free to hack away at it. I haven't covered Bem's study here and a lot of your excellent suggestions. StoneProphet11 (talk) 23:07, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCIX, June 2014[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:44, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Editors Barnstar Hires.png The Editor's Barnstar
For your hard work in the project. M.Karelin (talk) 13:22, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

NOR guidance[edit]

Hello: The change I made came about during my discussion at User_talk:Kingofaces43#Primary_sources. Since my Bold change didn't work out, I hope better minds can help clarify. Thanks. – S. Rich (talk) 21:34, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

No problem.
In my view the current line "a scientific paper documenting a new experiment conducted by the author is a primary source on the outcome of that experiment." is clear enough
The problem with your edit was that while it clearly aimed to clarify the phrase "a scientific research paper (that is a primary research paper)" implies that all scientific research papers are primary research papers. Literature review and meta-analyses are however still scientific research papers, but not primary.
In the current text that difference is made by the phrase "documenting a new experiment conducted by the author" - and that distinction disappears through your addition. I have no easy solution however. Arnoutf (talk) 07:34, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

You are correct[edit]

I was going to revert my own revert but you beat me to it. I'm tired and I totally misread the sentence the first time. Good catch. My bad. --AntHerder (talk) 09:34, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

No problem. Arnoutf (talk) 09:39, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Burchard du Puiset[edit]

I see with this diff you rated the article as start, with an edit summary of "lacking inline referencing for C" - not to quibble but ... what is lacking inline referencing? THe first "paragraph" is unreferened - it's the lead. Then there is exactly 5 sentences without citations on them directly, but each of those five is referenced to the next footnote, which is the common convention. Heck, even the footnotes are cited! You might want to reconsider the rating a bit in light of Wikipedia:WikiProject Middle Ages/Assessment. Thanks. Ealdgyth - Talk 21:31, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Sorry I rated two articles as start in a row. I rerated one that was fairly similar that had been set at C by others and copied the edit summary to that one by error into this one.
Nevertheless I do think it is a start level for several reasons though as it is not close to complete, e.g. has several one sentence paragraphs etc. Also there are several mistakes (eg office is from 120something while he died before 1200). Arnoutf (talk) 21:42, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue C, July 2014[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:47, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

July 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to National day of mourning may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • ], 1 day) <ref>http://www.nu.nl/binnenland/3834822/woensdag-23-juli-dag-van-nationale-rouw.html}</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:04, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Fixed Arnoutf (talk) 17:52, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CI, August 2014[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:23, 17 August 2014 (UTC)