User talk:Artw

Proposed deletion of Git (British slang)

The article Git (British slang) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Nothing links here, Git mentions this dictionary term

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cybercobra (talk) 21:09, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Edit warring

Four out of your last five edits on Jim B. Tucker, over the past two days, have consisted of removing the notability tag. If you continue to edit war, you may very well be blocked. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:40, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 04:53, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Artist bios at AFD

Good work on Dennis Detwiller and Mark Harrison (comic artist)! In addition to those, List of Magic: The Gathering artists has been nominated for AFD, along with the following Magic artist articles: Paul Bonner, Sue Ellen Brown, David A. Cherry, Fred Fields, David Ho (artist), Quinton Hoover, Dana Knutson, Stephan Martinière, and Terese Nielsen. If you are able to do more of the same for those, that would go a long way, I think. 24.148.0.83 (talk) 04:35, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Cheers. TBH. Mark Harrison and Dennis Detwiller are the only ones there I am really familiar with, and I'd sooner concentrate on getting those up to snuff rather than spread myself too thin, but I will certainly take a look if I get to the point where those are either totally rock solid or I can find no more references for them. Artw (talk) 04:38, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

It's cool - so far so good! 24.148.0.83 (talk) 11:52, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Saw your work on X-Mansion and Baxter Building as well; do your sources have anything for Massachusetts Academy (comics)? 24.148.0.83 (talk) 12:01, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

That one seems a little more borderline. I've removed the prod and taken it to AfD. Artw (talk) 21:19, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Just looking over the Mark Harrison article and it strikes me a good source would be the Meg 243 interview with David Bishop [1] which I don't have. Worth punting it over to the Hivemind to see what they can collectively dig up? I'm still digging though. (Emperor (talk) 17:09, 22 June 2010 (UTC))

Possibly. TBH you probably have more sway there, want to give it a go? Also I'm a little nervous doing that as I don't want people swarming in with Keep votes but nothing to back it up, so wording has to be VERY careful and explicitly warn people not to do that. Artw (talk) 17:22, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Indeed. (Emperor (talk) 00:11, 25 June 2010 (UTC))

There is also coverage in TPO. I'll have a root through that. (Emperor (talk) 00:14, 25 June 2010 (UTC))

As it seemed it was going to "no consensus" I didn't ask on the forum in case there was an influx of "keep"s, which could have been... awkward. I've asked now [2] and will see what we can do on getting this article up to spec. (Emperor (talk) 18:18, 30 June 2010 (UTC))

Some of the original batch of deletions were kept or ruled no consensus; the rest look like either clear keeps, or likely more of the no consensus variety. Sue Ellen Brown has been deleted, and Paul Bonner has no support, but many of the successful "rescues" in this case are thanks to the efforts of you and others, so I applaud you for that. Franz Vohwinkel, Nene Thomas, and Randy Post have been subsequently nominated for AFD, if you have anything that you can do for them. 24.148.0.83 (talk) 04:23, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Jclemens/Baxter Building

Feel free to come help me improve this. Jclemens (talk) 23:40, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

Cheers, will do. Artw (talk) 18:53, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

80px

Have you considered joining WikiProject Cryptozoology? We are a group of editors dedicated to improving the overall quality of Wikipedia's Cryptozoological coverage. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the list of participants. Please see our list of open tasks for ideas on where to get started. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page. We look forward to working with you in the future! ~~~~

== Nomination of Planet killer for deletion ==

A discussion has begun about whether the article Planet killer, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Planet killer 2 until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sadads (talk) 01:42, 9 December 2010 (UTC)