User talk:Ashishlohorung

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


You just knew how to greet in Lohorung. I have just cleaned my user talk page that's why it looks clean now. Soon admins will be biting my back as I am bit aggressive to try new things or articles in Wikipedia. If you want to see how they used to do that go to the archive pages which is developed by awesome ClueBot.


Ashish Lohorung (talk) 03:54, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

As mentioned[edit]

To quote what you and Mr Fisher said:

"I have researched "fearism" for many years, and there just isn't any more specific or reliable references than those already in the article." "The reason that it doesn't have good references is Fearism is not widely accepted and just in the beginning phase"

It's too early for an article about this. The book that you wrote an article about - you did not make any assertions of notability at all. The same for the man who wrote that book. Your only links were to the book's text via Google Books, and to the page on Amazon where the book can be purchased. This is absolutely not good enough, I'm sorry. And then for the article about the man, you linked some blog posts and some interviews on Youtube. Again, that's not enough. And then the article about the philosophy itself was an unsalvageable mess.

Can reasonable articles be written about this topic? I don't know. But what you produced were not reasonable articles. You're welcome to try again, though. DS (talk) 15:20, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Animal Nepal[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Animal Nepal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. JBH (talk) 20:44, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about People of Nepal (book)[edit]

Hello, Ashishlohorung,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether People of Nepal (book) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/People of Nepal (book) .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Fiachra10003 (talk) 15:49, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Embassy of Nepal, Canberra logo.jpg[edit]


Thanks for uploading File:Embassy of Nepal, Canberra logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:42, 12 April 2015 (UTC)