User talk:Aushulz

To contact me, write here

---

Hello, Aushulz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users - please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Happy editing! JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 01:18, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Thank you, Jeremy. I hope I will be useful here. --Aushulz (talk) 01:32, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Utente:Aushulz

A tag has been placed on Utente:Aushulz, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a foreign language article that was copied and pasted from another Wikimedia project, or was transwikied out to another project. Please see Wikipedia:Translation to learn about requests for, and coordination of, translations from foreign-language Wikipedias into English.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Mblumber (talk) 14:34, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Welcome

Let's speak English? I will add the email address to my preferences - sorry. Anyway, it's the same as in it:wiki. Here in en there is not much to do, most of the basic work is already done (if you want to amuse yourself, log to fr:wiki : a lot of blah blah articles, nothing in chemical engineering), so there is only the specialty work to do, and that's what I personally like. Did you come here through SUL? again, welcome. --UbUb (talk) 18:22, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for your welcome. Sorry, I don't know what a SUL is. The english version of wikipedia is surely more complete with regard to chemical engineering, but I prefer to write new articles, so I'll preferably write on it:wiki, adding new information or traslating from english articles. However I'll sometimes modify some english articles. I don't know french language. I am happy to collaborate with you. --Aushulz (talk) 23:22, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Category State functions

I think that this is an excellent category! I do think that subjects like Gibbs energy, Helmholtz energy do also belong to the general thermodynamics category and the statistical physics category. Count Iblis (talk) 21:05, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:Phase change - en.svg

Hi, I added the dark lines because it isn't clear to the clueless at glance that none of the states other than gas can change to plasma and visa-versa. I'll fix them tomorrow so they are symmetrical. -- penubag  (talk) 07:00, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Okay, I fixed the diagram. Tell me if you see anything else that needs fixing. -- penubag  (talk) 07:33, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Partial Britishing of Fire Extinguisher

Thanks for correcting the spelling errors. It's considered bad form though to change some of the words to their British spelling that are otherwise spelled correctly, when the rest of the article is written using US English spellings. Gigs (talk) 18:53, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

About the image you uploaded into Deaerator

The image you uploaded (Image:Deaerator2.png) appears to be either a copyright violation or advertising spam. This is a copy of a message I have just posted to an administrator on Wikimedia Commons:

Image:Deaerator2.png was uploaded by anonymous User:BerkeleyLab and claimed to be copyrighted by him/her. I believe it is either a copyright violation or was uploaded simply to advertise a deaerator manufacturer.

• (1) There is no such user as User:BerkeleyLab either here in Commons or in the English Wikipedia. So a copy violation template cannot be posted on that user's page.

• (2) It is an exact copy of a drawing from a presentation by Stork Power Services (a company in the Netherlands) who manufactures what is known as the Storq Deaerator. See the following websites and scroll down to the see their drawing which is exactly what was uploaded here as Image:Deaerator.png:
  • Website 1
  • Website 2 (This one take a bit of time to download)

I don't know if this is the correct place to post this message. If not, could someone get the proper person to read this message and take the necessary actions to delete the image? mbeychok (talk) 22:02, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Perhaps you were not aware of the above facts or that the image had been uploiaded into Deaerator once before and deleted because of the above facts. I thought it best to notify you that I have now asked for it to be deleted from Wikimedia Coomons. mbeychok (talk) 22:02, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

About KCN ...

Nice edits on other chem pages, but please you might want to talk to someone around here about the structure of inorganic cmpds, but KCN is not a triatomic, to put it mildly. --Smokefoot (talk) 18:02, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the note and I'd be glad to go into detail. KCN is a 3-d polymer, kind of like NaCl. We dont depict it as a molecule, although your tendency is understandable. The perspective that salts are polymers is a powerful one, but disappointing to those fresh from school because the structures of inorganic things are rarely explained, probably because few teachers even know. Anyway, our joke in the US is that ChemE's only know three elements: A, B, and C. Happy New Year,--Smokefoot (talk) 00:34, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

HCN is a molecule: it's aqueous solutions do not conduct electricity, so chemists are happy depicting it as a triatomic molecule. Whether KCN is ionic or not is not important for the solid - it is crosslinked. Each K has six close neighboring N or C atoms and each N has the triple bond to C and three K+ neighbors. Etc. You are correct that in solution something happens, CN- becomes free from the K+, but the K+ is suddenly surrounded by 6 water molecules. So it would be unacceptable (to chemists) to draw it as simply separated K+ and CN-, because again the K+ is not naked. Chemists agree that it is unreasonable to even try to depict highly solvated ionic species, so we dont. For polyatomic ionic species, it is more common to draw the ionic forms because the solvation is less important. So chemists usually do not complain about the image of potassium hexafluorophosphate. Its a problem. But definitely, we dont depict these as molecules. --Smokefoot (talk) 01:55, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Your Help Desk request regarding Template:Country data Chechnya

You reported a problem with Template:Country data Chechnya, however, you didn't mention what the problem is, and, well, it's not a case of a mangled layout or something else obvious, so you might want to do that. Equendil Talk 13:10, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Jacketed Vessel - Article

Hello, you asked for help in creating Jacketed vessel. I've created it and am willing to help you with it, just leave a message in the following thread: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Chemical_and_Bio_Engineering#Jacketed_vessel Waqqasd (talk) 10:35, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

The 3 references in the article are from the same document, I think they should all be one reference, rather than 3. May I change them to point to only the first page of the webpage? Waqqasd (talk) 21:31, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Ok, change the references as you saw. --Aushulz (talk) 23:18, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

(Just keeping everything in one place.) Waqqasd (talk) 11:06, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Emulsion Polymerization picture

Nice diagram, just make sure that it isn't protected by copyright.Delmlsfan (talk) 22:16, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Re: Quarena

And it doesn't have a common or an archaic meaning as a noun or adjective, does it? - Orion 8 (talk) 20:29, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Thank you very very much for your kind help, I have summarized your results for the questioner on my discussion page where he expects the answer. Üdv! Orion 8 (talk) 13:51, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Wiktionary logo voting page

Do you think you could update the Italian translation of the Wiktionary logo vote page to reflect this change? --Yair rand (talk) 18:34, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Hi. The Wiktionary logo vote schedule has been set: first round from 2009-12-07 00:01 until 2009-12-31 23:59 and then the second round will last until 2010-01-31 23:59. Could you notify the Italian Wiktionary of the schedule and provide them with a link to the it voting page? --Yair rand (talk) 06:32, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Portals

Are you still interested in the portal templates? There has been some development at {{portal}} and {{Portal box}}. Rich Farmbrough, 01:35, 10 May 2010 (UTC).

Italiani o no?

Ciao, So che ambasciator non porta pena. volevo chiederti se ritieni giusto che i personaggi storici nati prima dell' Unità d' Italia siano definiti Italiani? Io non credo. Voglio solo farvi l' esempio di Marco Polo. In tutte le lingue è definito Veneziano tranne che in Italiano. Non voglio inventarmi distinzioni o separatismi,ma se si vuole scrivere la storia bene bisogna essere corretti. Se tra 50 anni verrà un altro stato a conquistare l' Italia e io sarò morto,io che sono nato Italiano,sulla mia pagina di wikipedia vorrei rimanesse scritto come sono nato. Sarebbe giusto secondo voi che se la Cina o la Svizzera ci conquistassero si scrivesse che io sono Cinese o Svizzero? Non sono nazionalista ma piuttosto puntiglioso e credo che la storia vada rispettata. buon lavoro —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.48.52.207 (talk) 17:51, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Secondo me il termine "italiano" viene utilizzato in questi casi nel senso di "abitante della penisola italiana". Infatti il termine "Italia" indica sia la nazione italiana sia la penisola italiana. Comunque se vuoi aprire una discussione a tal proposito non dobbiamo parlarne solo io e tu, ma devi aprire una discussione con tutti gli altri utenti, ad esempio nella pagina Wikipedia:Community portal o simile. --Aushulz (talk) 08:53, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Internal oxidation

Ciao. I thought you might want to have a look, perhaps offer review/improvements, to the new article, as in the subject line. Best regards, Stan J. Klimas (talk) 01:08, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Done. I think can be a good idea to insert a picture of this particular corrosion. I have a doubt moreover: perhaps is "internal oxidation" a synonymous of selective leaching or a particular form of it? In the first case, they have to be merged. --Aushulz (talk) 01:26, 14 February 2012 (UTC)