User talk:Daniele Pugliesi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from User talk:Aushulz)
Jump to: navigation, search
Nuvola apps korn.png
Nuvola apps gaim.png
Nuvola apps kmail.png To contact me, write here


Hello, Aushulz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users - please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Happy editing! JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 01:18, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Thank you, Jeremy. I hope I will be useful here. --Aushulz (talk) 01:32, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Utente:Aushulz[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

A tag has been placed on Utente:Aushulz, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a foreign language article that was copied and pasted from another Wikimedia project, or was transwikied out to another project. Please see Wikipedia:Translation to learn about requests for, and coordination of, translations from foreign-language Wikipedias into English.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Mblumber (talk) 14:34, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Welcome[edit]

Let's speak English? I will add the email address to my preferences - sorry. Anyway, it's the same as in it:wiki. Here in en there is not much to do, most of the basic work is already done (if you want to amuse yourself, log to fr:wiki : a lot of blah blah articles, nothing in chemical engineering), so there is only the specialty work to do, and that's what I personally like. Did you come here through SUL? again, welcome. --UbUb (talk) 18:22, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for your welcome. Sorry, I don't know what a SUL is. The english version of wikipedia is surely more complete with regard to chemical engineering, but I prefer to write new articles, so I'll preferably write on it:wiki, adding new information or traslating from english articles. However I'll sometimes modify some english articles. I don't know french language. I am happy to collaborate with you. --Aushulz (talk) 23:22, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Category State functions[edit]

I think that this is an excellent category! I do think that subjects like Gibbs energy, Helmholtz energy do also belong to the general thermodynamics category and the statistical physics category. Count Iblis (talk) 21:05, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:Phase change - en.svg[edit]

Hi, I added the dark lines because it isn't clear to the clueless at glance that none of the states other than gas can change to plasma and visa-versa. I'll fix them tomorrow so they are symmetrical. -- penubag  (talk) 07:00, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Okay, I fixed the diagram. Tell me if you see anything else that needs fixing. -- penubag  (talk) 07:33, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Partial Britishing of Fire Extinguisher[edit]

Thanks for correcting the spelling errors. It's considered bad form though to change some of the words to their British spelling that are otherwise spelled correctly, when the rest of the article is written using US English spellings. Gigs (talk) 18:53, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

About the image you uploaded into Deaerator[edit]

The image you uploaded (Image:Deaerator2.png) appears to be either a copyright violation or advertising spam. This is a copy of a message I have just posted to an administrator on Wikimedia Commons:

Image:Deaerator2.png was uploaded by anonymous User:BerkeleyLab and claimed to be copyrighted by him/her. I believe it is either a copyright violation or was uploaded simply to advertise a deaerator manufacturer.

  • (1) There is no such user as User:BerkeleyLab either here in Commons or in the English Wikipedia. So a copy violation template cannot be posted on that user's page.
  • (2) It is an exact copy of a drawing from a presentation by Stork Power Services (a company in the Netherlands) who manufactures what is known as the Storq Deaerator. See the following websites and scroll down to the see their drawing which is exactly what was uploaded here as Image:Deaerator.png:
I don't know if this is the correct place to post this message. If not, could someone get the proper person to read this message and take the necessary actions to delete the image? mbeychok (talk) 22:02, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Perhaps you were not aware of the above facts or that the image had been uploiaded into Deaerator once before and deleted because of the above facts. I thought it best to notify you that I have now asked for it to be deleted from Wikimedia Coomons. mbeychok (talk) 22:02, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

About KCN ...[edit]

Nice edits on other chem pages, but please you might want to talk to someone around here about the structure of inorganic cmpds, but KCN is not a triatomic, to put it mildly. --Smokefoot (talk) 18:02, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the note and I'd be glad to go into detail. KCN is a 3-d polymer, kind of like NaCl. We dont depict it as a molecule, although your tendency is understandable. The perspective that salts are polymers is a powerful one, but disappointing to those fresh from school because the structures of inorganic things are rarely explained, probably because few teachers even know. Anyway, our joke in the US is that ChemE's only know three elements: A, B, and C. Happy New Year,--Smokefoot (talk) 00:34, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
HCN is a molecule: it's aqueous solutions do not conduct electricity, so chemists are happy depicting it as a triatomic molecule. Whether KCN is ionic or not is not important for the solid - it is crosslinked. Each K has six close neighboring N or C atoms and each N has the triple bond to C and three K+ neighbors. Etc. You are correct that in solution something happens, CN- becomes free from the K+, but the K+ is suddenly surrounded by 6 water molecules. So it would be unacceptable (to chemists) to draw it as simply separated K+ and CN-, because again the K+ is not naked. Chemists agree that it is unreasonable to even try to depict highly solvated ionic species, so we dont. For polyatomic ionic species, it is more common to draw the ionic forms because the solvation is less important. So chemists usually do not complain about the image of potassium hexafluorophosphate. Its a problem. But definitely, we dont depict these as molecules. --Smokefoot (talk) 01:55, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Your Help Desk request regarding Template:Country data Chechnya[edit]

You reported a problem with Template:Country data Chechnya, however, you didn't mention what the problem is, and, well, it's not a case of a mangled layout or something else obvious, so you might want to do that. Equendil Talk 13:10, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Jacketed Vessel - Article[edit]

Hello, you asked for help in creating Jacketed vessel. I've created it and am willing to help you with it, just leave a message in the following thread: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Chemical_and_Bio_Engineering#Jacketed_vessel Waqqasd (talk) 10:35, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

The 3 references in the article are from the same document, I think they should all be one reference, rather than 3. May I change them to point to only the first page of the webpage? Waqqasd (talk) 21:31, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Ok, change the references as you saw. --Aushulz (talk) 23:18, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
(Just keeping everything in one place.) Waqqasd (talk) 11:06, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Emulsion Polymerization picture[edit]

Nice diagram, just make sure that it isn't protected by copyright.Delmlsfan (talk) 22:16, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Re: Quarena[edit]

And it doesn't have a common or an archaic meaning as a noun or adjective, does it? - Orion 8 (talk) 20:29, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Thank you very very much for your kind help, I have summarized your results for the questioner on my discussion page where he expects the answer. Üdv! Orion 8 (talk) 13:51, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Wiktionary logo voting page[edit]

Do you think you could update the Italian translation of the Wiktionary logo vote page to reflect this change? --Yair rand (talk) 18:34, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Hi. The Wiktionary logo vote schedule has been set: first round from 2009-12-07 00:01 until 2009-12-31 23:59 and then the second round will last until 2010-01-31 23:59. Could you notify the Italian Wiktionary of the schedule and provide them with a link to the it voting page? --Yair rand (talk) 06:32, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Portals[edit]

Are you still interested in the portal templates? There has been some development at {{portal}} and {{Portal box}}. Rich Farmbrough, 01:35, 10 May 2010 (UTC).

Italiani o no?[edit]

Ciao, So che ambasciator non porta pena. volevo chiederti se ritieni giusto che i personaggi storici nati prima dell' Unità d' Italia siano definiti Italiani? Io non credo. Voglio solo farvi l' esempio di Marco Polo. In tutte le lingue è definito Veneziano tranne che in Italiano. Non voglio inventarmi distinzioni o separatismi,ma se si vuole scrivere la storia bene bisogna essere corretti. Se tra 50 anni verrà un altro stato a conquistare l' Italia e io sarò morto,io che sono nato Italiano,sulla mia pagina di wikipedia vorrei rimanesse scritto come sono nato. Sarebbe giusto secondo voi che se la Cina o la Svizzera ci conquistassero si scrivesse che io sono Cinese o Svizzero? Non sono nazionalista ma piuttosto puntiglioso e credo che la storia vada rispettata. buon lavoro —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.48.52.207 (talk) 17:51, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Secondo me il termine "italiano" viene utilizzato in questi casi nel senso di "abitante della penisola italiana". Infatti il termine "Italia" indica sia la nazione italiana sia la penisola italiana. Comunque se vuoi aprire una discussione a tal proposito non dobbiamo parlarne solo io e tu, ma devi aprire una discussione con tutti gli altri utenti, ad esempio nella pagina Wikipedia:Community portal o simile. --Aushulz (talk) 08:53, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Internal oxidation[edit]

Ciao. I thought you might want to have a look, perhaps offer review/improvements, to the new article, as in the subject line. Best regards, Stan J. Klimas (talk) 01:08, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Done. I think can be a good idea to insert a picture of this particular corrosion. I have a doubt moreover: perhaps is "internal oxidation" a synonymous of selective leaching or a particular form of it? In the first case, they have to be merged. --Aushulz (talk) 01:26, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Your HighBeam account is ready![edit]

Good news! You now have access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research. Here's what you need to know:

  • Your account activation code has been emailed to your Wikipedia email address.
    • Only 407 of 444 codes were successfully delivered; most failed because email was simply not set up (You can set it in Special:Preferences).
    • If you did not receive a code but were on the approved list, add your name to this section and we'll try again.
  • The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code.
  • To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1; 2) You’ll see the first page of a two-page registration. 3) Put in an email address and set up a password. (Use a different email address if you signed up for a free trial previously); 4) Click “Continue” to reach the second page of registration; 5) Input your basic information; 6) Input the activation code; 7) Click “Finish”. Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive.
  • If you need assistance, email "help at highbeam dot com", and include "HighBeam/Wikipedia" in the subject line. Or go to WP:HighBeam/Support, or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
  • A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate
  • HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
  • Show off your HighBeam access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}} on your userpage
  • When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi t | c 20:33, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Credo Reference Update & Survey (your opinion requested)[edit]

Credo Reference, who generously donated 400 free Credo 250 research accounts to Wikipedia editors over the past two years, has offered to expand the program to include 100 additional reference resources. Credo wants Wikipedia editors to select which resources they want most. So, we put together a quick survey to do that:

It also asks some basic questions about what you like about the Credo program and what you might want to improve.

At this time only the initial 400 editors have accounts, but even if you do not have an account, you still might want to weigh in on which resources would be most valuable for the community (for example, through WikiProject Resource Exchange).

Also, if you have an account but no longer want to use it, please leave me a note so another editor can take your spot.

If you have any other questions or comments, drop by my talk page or email me at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com. Cheers! Ocaasi t | c 17:08, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Credo Reference[edit]

I'm sorry to report that there were not enough accounts available for you to have one. I have you on our list though and if more become available we will notify you promptly.

We're continually working to bring resources like Credo to Wikipedia editors, and this will very hopefully not be your last opportunity to sign up for one. If you haven't already, please check out WP:HighBeam and WP:Questia, where accounts are still available. Cheers, Ocaasi 19:10, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Half coil vessel image[edit]

Hi, yes, the picture shows a vessel with an half coil jacket in production.

Jurecgermany — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.203.89.127 (talk) 05:31, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited OLGA (technology), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pipeline (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:10, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Science Museum images[edit]

Hi Daniele

Thanks very much for your suggestions, the museum has already the 50 images here, I'm hoping that the wide reach of these images will encourage the museum to release more, if they do agree then I'll put yours on the top of the next list, if you have any more images suggestion please feel free to put them on my talk page.

Thanks

Mrjohncummings (talk) 13:49, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter[edit]

Books and Bytes

Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013

Eurasian Eagle-Owl Maurice van Bruggen.JPG

by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...

New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian

Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.

New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??

New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges

News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY

Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions

New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration

Read the full newsletter

Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 22:03, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library Survey[edit]

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi t | c 16:00, 9 December 2013 (UTC)