User talk:Avinesh

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome to my talk page

Start new topics at the bottom, Click Here

Thanks[edit]

Avinesh,

Just a word of appreciation, it appears you're doing good work clearing up some of the cruft that has accumulated in Kerala-related articles. Relata refero (talk) 19:11, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your comments. I think this is the first time I get an appreciation since I’d been editing and doing all these general cleanups. --Avinesh Jose  T  05:10, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
No problem. Could you do me a favour and have a look at T. U. Kuruvilla? And if there's anything else that's an obvious source, drop me a line? Relata refero (talk) 20:08, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

apologies[edit]

Please see my further comment at the deletion review. i was too cryptic. I think it was a perfectly reasonable nomination, and you did nothing at all wrong in nominating it, or in the way you nominated it. But see there for why I think there should be a relisting.DGG (talk) 19:11, 10 February 2008 (UTC)


The Working Man's Barnstar[edit]

Working Man's Barnstar.png The Working Man's Barnstar
For your efforts on removing various non-notable genealogical articles from wikipedia. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 11:35, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

I saw you nominated various Kerala-related non-notable genealogical articles for deletion. This is necessary, it helped to maintain wikipedia's quality standard. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 11:35, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. --Avinesh Jose  T  04:17, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Government of Kerala[edit]

I had to revert your changes to Government of Kerala. Fair-use images require a detailed fair-use rationale, as per WP:IUP, for each use. --Yamla (talk) 04:37, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

I'd to revert your changes also since the image is back with proper copyright. --Avinesh Jose  T  08:06, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Fr. Thomas Kuzhinapurath[edit]

I have the book Bhashathilakam published by the University of Kerala with me. If you are so keen to see it I will get it scanned send the pages which contain the article of Fr. Thomas Kuzhinapurath. About his work Daivajanam please try a google search for daivanam and see the website of carmel international publishing house add then 'find on this page' daivajanam. www.ciph.com/books Please try also www.omanmalankaracatholics.blogspot.com Please search in www.worldcat.or for daivajanam But the name of the author is transliterated.Simon Cheakkanal (talk) 08:04, 26 February 2008 (UTC)


Scanned Pages[edit]

Please find the scanned pages of Bhashathilakam. Simon Cheakkanal (talk) 03:50, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Daivajanam[edit]

I would suggest that you put a {{merge}} tag on this article proposing that it be merged into the article on the author. I do not have a clear opinion on whether the article on the author should be kept although I am inclined towards Deletion (and I am an inclusionist!). In any event, if Daivajanam belongs in Wikipedia, it does not merit an article unto itself. If it belongs in Wikipedia at all, it should be as part of the article on the author.

--Richard (talk) 04:58, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

The latter one ([author]) is under AfD discussion. So it is better to wait and make a decision based on the result. --Avinesh Jose  T  05:08, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi Avinesh Jose,
Please find the scanned image of the review on Daivajanam. Simon Cheakkanal (talk) 04:19, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi Richard, I've placed merge tag & requesting your comment there. --Avinesh Jose  T  06:32, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Santhosh George Kulangara and Sancharam[edit]

Hello, Can you please write about Santhosh George Kulangara and Sancharam in Malayalam Wikipedia also.Thanks in advance--Anoopan (talk) 06:34, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi, I will try when I'm free. --Avinesh Jose  T  06:51, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Courtesy notification[edit]

Just letting you know that Tinucherian has raised an incident here. Orderinchaos 07:50, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks orderinchaos. --Avinesh Jose  T  10:25, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

DYK: Chelembra Bank Robbery[edit]

Updated DYK query On 4 March, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Chelembra Bank Robbery, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
--PFHLai (talk) 22:16, 4 March 2008 (UTC)


I agree[edit]

Your wordings were more proper to the context. Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashrafmedia (talkcontribs) 10:55, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Peer review feedback[edit]

Hi, I noticed you have a request in at peer review which has not yet received any response besides the semi-automated script. Have you tried requesting a peer review from the volunteers list? Another idea you might want to try is to review someone else's request (particularly one from the list of requests without responses), then ask that they look at your request. Hope these are helpful suggestions and help to get some feedback for your request soon, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 21:49, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi, Thanks for the suggestion. Actually, I ignored watchlisting it and checked the JavaScript result now. I will make the enhancement based on it. As you’d suggested, I will try other possible options also. --Avinesh Jose  T  05:20, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
I keep track of peer review requests that have no responses yet here: Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog. I do the peer review myself if no one else does and will get to yours in several days. Keep up the good work, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 12:27, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

re to your message for removal of honda x11[edit]

I do think you were right on the suggestion made to remove the article on honda x11. The main purpose of my creating it was to prevent the title of this super bike left unanswered. In a short notice I would change the article into a more elaborate and meaningful one. Thankyou. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Realkarthik (talkcontribs) 04:48, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

To Mr Avinesh Jose[edit]

Hello, Mr. Avinesh Jose. To briefly introduce myself, my name is Sean Kim and I currently work in South Korea company related to researching and understanding India's government. I was searching for information about Kerala's government through the Internet and I have noticed that you were the last person to update information about Kerala in Wikipedia. If you can spare a little time of explaining the State Government of Kerala, I would be very pleased. I'm curious of how State Government of Kerala is organized. I would like to know who is in control of the departments (ranked position from top to bottom). So far, I understand that the governor is in charge of the state, the chief minister is the head of the Council of Ministers. What I would like to know is who is in charge of each departments. Is it the state council of ministers or the central government ministers or the secretary to departments? I am very confused of the ranked position of one particular state's government. To put this in order, first is governor, second is chief minister, third is Council of Ministers. I'm not sure after that; the lower ranked positions. If you can help me please reply to kim.hanseul@hotmail.com. Thank you for your time and consideration. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.76.164.201 (talk) 02:45, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

I'd updated Government of Kerala based on your query. Hope you get more info from here also. Thanks. --Avinesh Jose  T  08:56, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Reply[edit]

The comment was mine to begin with, and I added it as an explanation for my initial opinion. So I'm not sure why you and Harjk are telling me to stop moving other people's comments. I haven't moved anyone's comments, just mine. --vi5in[talk] 22:15, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Because, it was in my watchlist since I’d participated in the first AfD discussion. In the second AfD, I undid your edit to make it in a chronological order in order to taking the confusion out of closing admin. (because I noticed that you pushed your comments above Tomb’s comment after he commented as per recorded time & tomb wants it to be stay behind the same). Please check the time & see who edited first. Therefore, I think that my undo (tried resolving edit war?) was logical and reasonable. --Avinesh Jose  T  04:32, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
I understand that your intentions were good, but in future please don't move other people's comments. I didn't "push" my comments above Tomb's. He was complaining that I posted my vote because of JNN, so I added my comment as an explanation TO my vote. But when I did it the first time, I wrongly added it as a reply to Tomb, which wasn't what I intended. Chronological order doesn't necessarily mean "logical" ordering either. I really don't care what Tomb wants. He doesn't seem to understand edit histories well. If you look at the diff, you will see that I made the initial comment, and I moved it. Assuming you have the following ordering of comments:
  • A (time x)
  • B (time x + 1)
  • C (time x + 2)
  • D (time x + 3)
A person E can reply to any particular post above and you can end up with the following:
  • A (time x)
  • B (time x + 1)
  • E (time x + 4)
  • C (time x + 2)
  • D (time x + 3)
  • E (time x + 5)
So if you try to order everything chronologically, the thread would lose its meaning. --vi5in[talk] 15:09, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment by Tomb: Sorry User:Vivin, your logic was completely blundering and not acceptable by me or others. Let me just elaborate it:

1) A (time x) You commented this: Delete - Not notable enough... yet. --vi5in[talk] 16:29, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

2) B (time x + 1) I commented: WP:JNN, Possible bad faith comment by User:Vivin (NotableGuru per WP:JNN). He/she has a bad faith track of targetting my edit and falsely commenting. Check the contributions for more details. --Tomb of the Unknown Warrior tomb 04:28, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

3) Here the problem was. You should have commented to the B (time x + 1) instead of dragging my comment to the down (that was reverted by Avineshjose) and adding your comment. You did that because you knew that your comment was made by WP:ABF and trying to hide it.

So it is better, if you could take off some time and learn more about how to edit WP. In future, please don't move other people's comments. Hope this helps in your case. --Tomb of the Unknown Warrior tomb 05:15, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Stop asking me to "take time off". I'm more than aware of Wikipedia policies, and frankly it's quite amusing coming from someone who has barely any grasp of Wikipdia policies or the inevitable consequence of adding a line above another in a body of text (it drags it "to the down" as you so eloquently put it). I'm not going to bother with this anymore, especially with someone who can't understand something this simple. For the last time. I never moved your comment. I moved mine. Seriously... I thought I had seen everything. Avinesh, thanks for trying to help. --vi5in[talk] 15:52, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Malankara church[edit]

Hi Avinesh , You definitely have no idea about the History of Christianity in India. Malankara Church is the original church established by St. Thomas in India. It was undivided until 15th century - later it become different denominations Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church,Malankara Mar Thoma Syrian Church,Malankara Catholic Syrian Church,Syro-Malabar Catholic Church etc during the course of history. It is very clear understandable you are still continuing doing things in bad faith ...( The latest one is the merger proposal ) . Let me know what is ur problem ? -- ₮inucherian (Talk) - 09:45, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
  • No, no bad faith. I'd come across it & noticed the problem. Just see that both article looks almost same. If there are two articles created with same contents, don't you think that it should be merged. --Avinesh Jose  T  13:11, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

unblock request moved here[edit]

File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Avinesh (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblock)


Request reason:

This user created a sock to edit in ANI. This is not permitted. Out of courtesy, I am moving his complaint to an unblock request.... This is about a sock case. I have no idea about who is User:Harjk. The nominator and blocked admin seem to be confused over my connection with Harjk as a check user would have showed some ‘likely’ result. I am a business man who uses a shared ip address connected with a number of computers. In my office, everyone knows that I am a wikipedian and we use WP a lot in order to get piece of valuable information. It is possible that some of the shared techies may have tracked my contributions & trying to ‘help’ me. The same incident happened when I was previously accused of sock puppet that I clearly explained to then closing admin. Anyway, I am not going to find who did it at all as long as it is not a major issue talking about my business. About blocking, how can an admin block a well known editor without even listening from the concerned editor? The nominator and the blocked admin could have leaved a message in my talk pg or over email. It is noted that the admins decision was in hurriedly, without listening my comment. He/she should wait for a 5-6 days, before reaching to a conclusion. It was unfair and miserable from an admin who not suppose to do it, in my opinion. The nominator User:Vivin commented in the [Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Avineshjose evidence page] that, I thought it was a bit odd seeing as he had never involved himself in that particular AfD before. The statement is wrong, as I have participated in the previous nomination previous AfD, I am much interested to know the result of it. Moreover, I did not give votes anywhere where harjk had participated. Therefore, no reason for doubting me as sock. comment posted by User:avineshjose as I am blocked & unable to edit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.93.18.136 (talk) 05:08, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This request does not convince me that the block was made in error. — Sandstein (talk) 12:25, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first and then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page for as long as you are blocked.

  • You can simply decline/whatever u want since you are an admin. If you had ever worked in a shared computer nw, and more sense on ip related issues, you should not have commented in such a way. Thanks chaser on understanding the situation. --Avinesh Jose  T  10:40, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Avineshjose, please also see Wikipedia:Sock_puppetry#Roommates_and_sharing_an_IP_address. We have limited means of separating real people on the same network.--chaser - t 19:28, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Just to say hai[edit]

Labour India[edit]


  • If you don't find anything wrong with the following sentence, then leave out the business of copy editing or templating to others.

It brings out educational monthly journals in three different languages, ranging from the pre-primary level to Plus Two level and the entrance exams in every month.

Uzhuthiran (talk) 05:54, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

  • It is better if you could edit the article instead of simply talking about it/adding temps. It has been already edited by many and still you want to add the template. --Avinesh Jose  T  05:57, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Your email to me[edit]

Hi mate I'm happy for you to email me via the "email this user" link... but no I won't be responding to an email from my wikipedia registered email address without a bit more knowledge of what it's about.

To be honest I thought it was spam but your talk page has you looking legit.

Garrie 02:49, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Reply[edit]

I've replied to your reply to my (deleted) post on your talk page. --vi5in[talk] 06:23, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

For future reference. You might want to actually have evidence and not just a "suspicion" that someone is a sockpuppet. Making a sockpuppet accusation is serious so I suggest you don't frivolously hurl accusations around just because things don't go your way. --vi5in[talk] 23:25, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
  • The page itself is titled as "Suspected sock puppets". --Avinesh Jose  T  04:04, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Please tell me you can read this[edit]

Okay. For some reason, your user and user talk pages were not moved to your new username, Avinesh. I moved them, and all should be well now, I hope. As they say, let me know if you didn't get this message. :) WODUP 05:53, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Its ok. but why did you add nowwiki, seems my user pg spoiled. --Avinesh Jose  T  05:58, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
That website is on the global spam blacklist. You can't save the page with that as a link. Sorry. WODUP 06:01, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
No probs, I manually removed it. I didn't get the code (nowwiki) you added. --Avinesh Jose  T  06:09, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Re: For your fine work[edit]

Hmmm this template looks odd on your talk page. Anyway, thanks. :) -Samuel Tan 06:46, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for copyediting the article which I have started Akkamma Cherian recently. ( still keep watching my contribs, huh ? :) ). I hope you are kind enough of forgetting us crossing horns some time back. Really appreciated. Keep up the good work and have a gr8 day -- Tinu Cherian - 11:37, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

ANI[edit]

Filed at your request. --vi5in[talk] 00:09, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

replied over there. --Avinesh  T  04:42, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
ANI case regarding your alternate enforcer account here. --vi5in[talk] 05:36, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

SSP[edit]

Information.svg You have been accused of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Avineshjose (3rd). Thank you. vi5in[talk] 20:49, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Block[edit]

{{gblock|abusive sockpuppetry and edit warring|1 week}}--Tznkai (talk) 04:17, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

The issue is at unresolved ANI case. --Avinesh  T  09:42, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

ANI[edit]

The issue is at ANI now: ANI archive page and discussion with the blocking admin also. Note that the case is not yet resolved. --Avinesh  T  09:42, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Editing on behalf of banned users[edit]

Regarding this edit, it appears that the user for whom you were editing is currently indefinitely blocked. Please see Wikipedia:Banning_policy#Editing_on_behalf_of_banned_users for more information on why this is a problematic thing for you to do. Per policy, I have reverted your edit to the page. Thanks, and cheers. --slakrtalk / 11:11, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

OMG, I did not much aware of that tricky policy too. Anyway thanks for your note. However, I slightly edited my comment & restored it at the same talk page. --Avinesh  T  05:19, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Re:BARN[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Avinesh. You have new messages at Tinucherian's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

-- Tinu Cherian - 11:45, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Lucinda Southworth[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Lucinda Southworth. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucinda Southworth. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:06, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

No more WP activities. Thanks. Avinesh  T  05:29, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

K M Mathew[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Avinesh. You have new messages at Talk:K M Mathew.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Rameshng (talk) 16:21, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Invite to WikiConference India 2011[edit]

WCI banner.png

Hi Avinesh,

The First WikiConference India is being organized in Mumbai and will take place on 18-20 November 2011.
You can see our Official website, the Facebook event and our Scholarship form.

But the activities start now with the 100 day long WikiOutreach.

As you are part of WikiProject India community we invite you to be there for conference and share your experience. Thank you for your contributions.

We look forward to see you at Mumbai on 18-20 November 2011

File:Harold Son of Avineshjose.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Harold Son of Avineshjose.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:55, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

AfD Rahul Easwar[edit]

An article you have contributed is nominated for deletion. Rahul Easwar. Pls participate in the deletion discussion. Wikieditindia (talk) 11:48, 22 January 2012 (UTC)