Hi, I'm sorry but I deleted your recent addition of a "DOS internals" section in the Disk operating system article. I felt that it didn't belong into there as the article is meant to describe "disk operating systems" in general. I know, that the term DOS today is often associated with MS-DOS-alike operating systems (like MS-DOS, PC DOS, DR-DOS, FreeDOS and many others), but originally, it covered many more operating systems which were "disk based". While the basic architecture of MS-DOS can be found also in similar systems such as DR-DOS and (to a lesser extent, FreeDOS), most of the other disk-based operating systems mentioned in the article have completely different architectures and interfaces, most of them are not even designed for x86-processors. So, it would be better if you would add that information to articles such as DOS (however, please keep in mind, that the filenames you mentioned are specific to MS-DOS and that PC DOS, DR-DOS, FreeDOS etc. use other filenames). Greetings. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 12:59, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
You have a valid point. Will add this to another page. Thanks for the guidance. :) Barkhadhamechai(talk) 14:13, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for the barnstar. Actually, I had been just providing referneces, but your are adding quality to the article. Thats great frankly! Let me know if you facing any problem while editing, I'm there :) Thank you. -- ♪Karthik♫♪Nadar♫ 14:57, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
The article still needs quite a lot of references, I'm not getting those actually. We can remove, no problem, but still the references are not that enough, because the article is quite vast. So will add few more, and I'm sure you will add to. Will remove it may be a week later, fine? -- ♪Karthik♫♪Nadar♫ 05:43, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
Yes! no problem, delete that later. I will also search for more references :) Barkhatalk 05:50, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
FINALLY! the women's clothing makes sense! Glad you took the initiative at such short notice, I can look at it and go like the pic :D Écrivain (talk) 12:58, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
Actually, the history section was super-awesome and in women's clothing the images were messed up :P and I liked your idea of making different sub-sections for dresses :D so went for it ;) Barkhatalk 14:41, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
Indian Collaboration of the Month - Red Fort
Indian Collaboration of the Month
Hi there! Thanks for being associated with the nomination cum voting process of the WikiProject Indian Collaboration of the Month under WikiProject India. As per the voting, the article selected for collaboration for the month of August 2012 is Red Fort. Let's improve this article over the course of the month. I look forward to your contributions on the article. BPositive(talk) 14:01, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Note: If you are seeing this message on someone's talk page and wish to be a part of the collaboration, add yourself in the members list.
Hi Barkha dhamechai! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative.
As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by: