User talk:Bartledan

Welcome!

Hello, Bartledan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Mizu onna sango15/水女珊瑚15 19:17, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

71.146.6.52 Wrote:

• go fuck ya self Geek! what are u in Special Ed

Yep. I'm special. Have a nice day. Bartledan (talk) 00:13, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Trump International Hotel and Tower (Chicago)

I see you recently edited Trump International Hotel and Tower (Chicago). You may be interested in commenting at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Trump International Hotel and Tower (Chicago).--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 19:44, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Userpage message

Welcome to my userpage. Feel free to vandalize it. If you're angry at me for reverting one of your edits, then please go stick your head in a pig.

Kinda WP:BITEY and bad faith-ish, don't you think? Maybe that's just my interpretation, but perhaps you should change it, lest someone get offended. I know it's intended to be humourous, but it could be taken the wrong way.

Cheers, --Mizu onna sango15/水女珊瑚15 01:40, 21 June 2008 (UTC).

• Fair enough. I'll tone it down. Bartledan (talk) 00:23, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Rollback

I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. PeterSymonds (talk) 21:57, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for all your hard work at keeping vandalism under control! All the best, PeterSymonds (talk) 21:57, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

GILF

I saw same way to cover word fuck in article MILF so I believe that it is good solution. --Vojvodaeist 11:44, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Sorry about that. It was a mistake on my part.

Wrong Message

You have sent me a message stating that i have made unconstructive edits to some page; you are most mistaken. Thank you D87 (talk) 16:42, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

I wish I knew what you are referring to. I can't find any instances in which I've edited your user talk page (at the moment the page does not even exist). Could you give me a little more info? Thanks, Bartledan (talk) 17:08, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Brad Barr

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Brad Barr. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brad Barr. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:04, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of PieFace Records for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article PieFace Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PieFace Records until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Lachlanusername (talk) 04:17, 15 August 2011 (UTC)